Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	4	0.61	4	0.02	4	0.20	4	0.65	25	0.39	8	0.50
Anderszewski 2003	62	0.42	25	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.11	75	0.03	53	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981	59	0.43	52	0.00	42	0.06	38	0.23	62	0.04	44	0.10
Bacha 2000	67	0.41	78	0.00	70	0.04	60	0.04	53	0.06	58	0.05
Badura 1965	68	0.40	79	0.00	68	0.04	55	0.04	58	0.05	72	0.04
Barbosa 1983	46	0.47	80	0.00	48	0.06	46	0.06	45	0.09	52	0.07
Biret 1990	19	0.55	6	0.02	9	0.14	9	0.61	15	0.44	6	0.52
Blet 2003	43	0.49	48	0.00	50	0.05	48	0.05	68	0.04	68	0.04
Block 1995	73	0.38	84	0.00	84	0.02	88	0.02	86	0.02	90	0.02
Blumental 1952	79	0.35	51	0.00	51	0.04	56	0.04	71	0.04	73	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969	50	0.46	49	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	80	0.04	74	0.04
Brailowsky 1960	63	0.42	85	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	82	0.03	79	0.03
Bunin 1987	48	0.46	44	0.00	63	0.04	58	0.04	48	0.06	62	0.05
Bunin 1987b	51	0.45	76	0.00	64	0.03	72	0.03	49	0.06	65	0.04
Chiu 1999	72	0.38	73	0.00	71	0.04	57	0.04	70	0.04	64	0.04
Cohen 1997	82	0.33	11	0.01	82	0.03	86	0.03	23	0.31	45	0.10
Cortot 1951	60	0.42	81	0.00	60	0.03	71	0.03	58	0.05	77	0.04
Csalog 1996	69	0.39	63	0.00	62	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.05	67	0.04
Czerny 1949	2	0.65	2	0.08	2	0.26	2	0.74	7	0.66	1	0.70
Czerny 1990	6	0.61	53	0.00	8	0.21	6	0.63	23	0.37	11	0.48
Duchoud 2007	57	0.43	20	0.00	73	0.04	62	0.04	74	0.04	71	0.04
Ezaki 2006	13	0.56	33	0.00	20	0.08	17	0.49	37	0.23	21	0.34
Falvay 1989	17	0.55	24	0.00	21	0.09	11	0.56	22	0.43	10	0.49
Farrell 1958	38	0.50	38	0.00	32	0.08	29	0.38	20	0.38	14	0.38
Ferenczy 1958	53	0.44	21	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	49	0.05	61	0.05
Fliere 1977	23	0.54	82	0.00	36	0.08	32	0.29	83	0.03	46	0.09
Fou 1978	31	0.51	16	0.01	11	0.12	24	0.44	33	0.25	22	0.33
Francois 1956	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Friedman 1923	87	0.27	60	0.00	76	0.03	65	0.03	77	0.04	89	0.03
Friedman 1923b	88	0.27	42	0.00	75	0.03	85	0.03	66	0.05	75	0.04
Friedman 1930	70	0.39	55	0.00	65	0.04	64	0.04	44	0.10	54	0.06
Garcia 2007	86	0.28	70	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	62	0.04	86	0.03
Garcia 2007b	85	0.28	45	0.00	78	0.03	83	0.03	72	0.04	88	0.03
Gierzod 1998	22	0.55	74	0.00	27	0.09	25	0.43	47	0.07	32	0.17
Gornostaeva 1994	3	0.63	14	0.01	6	0.15	5	0.64	21	0.50	3	0.57
Groot 1988	8	0.60	5	0.02	7	0.17	7	0.62	9	0.49	4	0.55
Harasiewicz 1955	37	0.50	37	0.00	28	0.10	26	0.41	57	0.05	34	0.14
Hatto 1993	84	0.30	83	0.00	77	0.03	73	0.03	77	0.04	87	0.03
Hatto 1997	76	0.37	69	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.09	80	0.04	55	0.06
Horowitz 1949	65	0.41	64	0.00	59	0.03	68	0.03	72	0.03	83	0.03
Indjic 1988	83	0.32	91	0.00	74	0.03	82	0.03	85	0.03	85	0.03
Kapell 1951	14	0.56	46	0.00	24	0.10	30	0.37	62	0.04	37	0.12
Kissin 1993	32	0.51	59	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.25	50	0.06	38	0.12
Kushner 1989	12	0.56	75	0.00	13	0.12	19	0.49	33	0.26	18	0.36
Luisada 1991	56	0.44	62	0.00	54	0.04	52	0.04	70	0.04	63	0.04
Lushtak 2004	39	0.50	68	0.00	22	0.08	22	0.46	36	0.21	26	0.31
Malcuzynski 1961	20	0.55	36	0.00	35	0.06	37	0.24	52	0.05	39	0.11
Magaloff 1978	16	0.55	30	0.00	26	0.09	23	0.45	28	0.27	19	0.35
Magin 1975	64	0.42	32	0.00	43	0.08	40	0.18	48	0.06	43	0.10
Michalowski 1933	74	0.38	47	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	54	0.06	66	0.04
Milkina 1970	9	0.58	22	0.00	18	0.09	15	0.52	38	0.24	20	0.35
Mohovich 1999	10	0.56	28	0.00	15	0.12	13	0.54	31	0.34	12	0.43
Moravec 1969	28	0.53	66	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	31	0.23	36	0.12
Morozova 2008	54	0.44	71	0.00	38	0.05	36	0.25	53	0.05	41	0.11
Neighaus 1950	5	0.61	13	0.01	3	0.22	3	0.69	15	0.48	2	0.58
Niedzielski 1931	45	0.47	27	0.00	55	0.03	70	0.03	49	0.04	82	0.03
Ohlsson 1999	26	0.54	29	0.00	33	0.08	31	0.36	42	0.13	31	0.22
Osinska 1989	7	0.61	15	0.01	10	0.16	8	0.61	28	0.40	9	0.49
Pachmann 1927	66	0.41	86	0.00	81	0.03	84	0.03	47	0.07	59	0.05
Paderewski 1930	34	0.51	19	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.18	5	0.47	27	0.29
Perlemuter 1992	18	0.55	8	0.02	14	0.13	12	0.54	10	0.47	7	0.50
Pierdomenico 2008	47	0.46	34	0.00	31	0.07	34	0.28	9	0.50	16	0.37
Poblocka 1999	44	0.48	67	0.00	56	0.04	53	0.04	86	0.03	80	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932	11	0.56	3	0.02	5	0.15	10	0.57	6	0.52	5	0.54
Rachmaninoff 1923	30	0.52	17	0.01	29	0.10	28	0.38	37	0.13	30	0.22
Rangell 2001	61	0.42	87	0.00	69	0.03	76	0.03	65	0.05	76	0.04
Richter 1976	80	0.34	72	0.00	88	0.04	61	0.04	82	0.03	84	0.03
Rosen 1989	25	0.54	10	0.01	12	0.15	21	0.48	25	0.35	13	0.41
Rosenthal 1930	49	0.46	88	0.00	67	0.03	69	0.03	43	0.13	57	0.06
Rosenthal 1931	78	0.35	90	0.00	83	0.03	87	0.03	40	0.21	50	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b	77	0.36	40	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	30	0.30	48	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c	55	0.44	61	0.00	66	0.03	66	0.03	28	0.37	42	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d	71	0.39	43	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	31	0.24	51	0.08
Rossi 2007	75	0.37	7	0.02	52	0.04	54	0.04	16	0.42	35	0.13
Rubinstein 1939	81	0.34	54	0.00	87	0.03	67	0.03	76	0.04	81	0.03
Rubinstein 1952	29	0.52	26	0.00	30	0.08	33	0.29	27	0.35	25	0.32
Rubinstein 1966	35	0.51	39	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.16	56	0.07	40	0.11
Schilhawsky 1960	41	0.49	41	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	52	0.06	60	0.05
Shebanova 2002	42	0.49	77	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	86	0.03	70	0.04
Smith 1975	15	0.56	31	0.00	19	0.08	20	0.48	27	0.29	15	0.37
Sokolov 2002	24	0.54	12	0.01	25	0.07	18	0.49	32	0.26	17	0.36
Sztompka 1959	21	0.55	65	0.00	23	0.08	16	0.50	40	0.13	29	0.25
Tomsic 1995	36	0.51	23	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.23	25	0.30	28	0.26
Uninsky 1932	58	0.43	57	0.00	57	0.03	75	0.03	59	0.06	69	0.04
Uninsky 1971	40	0.50	50	0.00	34	0.05	43	0.13	65	0.05	49	0.08
Wasowski 1980	52	0.45	35	0.00	58	0.03	74	0.03	65	0.04	78	0.03
Zak 1937	33	0.51	18	0.01	17	0.11	27	0.39	62	0.05	33	0.14
Zak 1951	27	0.53	9	0.01	16	0.14	14	0.52	42	0.20	23	0.32
Average	1	0.69	1	0.64	1	0.63	1	0.83	45	0.12	24	0.32
Random 1	91	-0.09	89	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	80	0.02	91	0.01
Random 2	89	-0.02	56	0.00	90	0.02	89	0.02	38	0.17	56	0.06
Random 3	90	-0.02	58	0.00	89	0.02	90	0.02	11	0.42	47	0.09

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).