Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	27	0.56	51	0.00	41	0.08	43	0.15	52	0.05	56	0.09
Anderszewski 2003	47	0.53	15	0.01	38	0.07	35	0.25	32	0.22	37	0.23
Ashkenazy 1981	37	0.55	12	0.01	30	0.06	33	0.27	45	0.14	39	0.19
Bacha 2000	74	0.42	83	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	56	0.05	71	0.04
Badura 1965	38	0.55	37	0.00	22	0.08	21	0.39	8	0.56	16	0.47
Barbosa 1983	72	0.43	23	0.00	61	0.05	56	0.05	79	0.04	76	0.04
Biret 1990	49	0.51	26	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	54	0.06	69	0.05
Blet 2003	45	0.53	59	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	33	0.19	53	0.10
Block 1995	20	0.58	7	0.02	12	0.18	12	0.54	5	0.63	7	0.58
Blumental 1952	58	0.48	19	0.00	51	0.06	51	0.06	42	0.09	64	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Brailowsky 1960	52	0.50	69	0.00	68	0.04	76	0.04	38	0.23	51	0.10
Bunin 1987	50	0.51	63	0.00	58	0.05	58	0.05	33	0.23	50	0.11
Bunin 1987b	51	0.50	81	0.00	59	0.05	65	0.05	33	0.24	47	0.11
Chiu 1999	71	0.43	64	0.00	69	0.04	70	0.04	67	0.04	72	0.04
Cohen 1997	88	0.29	76	0.00	80	0.03	85	0.03	71	0.04	86	0.03
Cortot 1951	64	0.45	71	0.00	74	0.05	59	0.05	43	0.13	60	0.08
Csalog 1996	81	0.38	27	0.00	79	0.04	69	0.04	58	0.05	78	0.04
Czerny 1949	46	0.53	77	0.00	49	0.07	48	0.07	47	0.08	63	0.07
Czerny 1990	29	0.56	66	0.00	54	0.05	60	0.05	57	0.05	68	0.05
Duchoud 2007	68	0.43	29	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	69	0.04	79	0.04
Ezaki 2006	40	0.54	84	0.00	52	0.04	67	0.04	59	0.05	70	0.04
Falvay 1989	61	0.46	88	0.00	78	0.04	74	0.04	69	0.05	74	0.04
Farrell 1958	62	0.46	75	0.00	64	0.04	72	0.04	52	0.06	66	0.05
Ferenczy 1958	79	0.39	87	0.00	83	0.03	88	0.03	78	0.02	88	0.02
Fliere 1977	2	0.70	2	0.17	2	0.46	2	0.73	5	0.65	1	0.69
Fou 1978	16	0.59	28	0.00	10	0.17	11	0.55	12	0.48	13	0.51
Francois 1956	63	0.46	52	0.00	72	0.04	80	0.04	63	0.04	83	0.04
Friedman 1923	82	0.38	72	0.00	65	0.05	64	0.05	19	0.39	43	0.14
Friedman 1923b	80	0.38	79	0.00	63	0.05	61	0.05	19	0.40	41	0.14
Friedman 1930	65	0.45	48	0.00	62	0.05	54	0.05	37	0.18	55	0.09
Garcia 2007	56	0.49	25	0.00	31	0.06	37	0.23	4	0.71	24	0.40
Garcia 2007b	67	0.43	41	0.00	56	0.05	66	0.05	16	0.40	42	0.14
Gierzod 1998	6	0.64	11	0.01	9	0.21	8	0.66	17	0.49	8	0.57
Gornostaeva 1994	7	0.64	31	0.00	14	0.13	14	0.50	20	0.50	15	0.50
Groot 1988	44	0.54	50	0.00	47	0.07	46	0.07	37	0.23	45	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955	11	0.61	40	0.00	3	0.16	3	0.69	10	0.52	6	0.60
Hatto 1993	70	0.43	73	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.18	46	0.08	46	0.12
Hatto 1997	75	0.42	16	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	50	0.06	59	0.08
Horowitz 1949	32	0.55	13	0.01	29	0.06	32	0.28	9	0.61	21	0.41
Indjic 1988	69	0.43	74	0.00	43	0.07	42	0.16	49	0.07	49	0.11
Kapell 1951	54	0.50	67	0.00	66	0.05	57	0.05	57	0.05	67	0.05
Kissin 1993	5	0.65	8	0.01	8	0.18	10	0.60	17	0.51	9	0.55
Kushner 1989	8	0.64	9	0.01	11	0.18	9	0.61	17	0.46	11	0.53
Luisada 1991	25	0.57	35	0.00	37	0.06	29	0.29	37	0.26	33	0.27
Lushtak 2004	33	0.55	42	0.00	27	0.09	30	0.28	34	0.24	36	0.26
Malcuzynski 1961	4	0.67	4	0.04	7	0.20	6	0.67	9	0.55	5	0.61
Magaloff 1978	21	0.58	57	0.00	23	0.07	26	0.31	23	0.34	28	0.32
Magin 1975	13	0.60	17	0.00	26	0.09	31	0.28	30	0.26	34	0.27
Michalowski 1933	55	0.49	30	0.00	55	0.06	49	0.06	35	0.27	44	0.13
Milkina 1970	39	0.54	44	0.00	32	0.06	27	0.31	35	0.29	31	0.30
Mohovich 1999	22	0.58	53	0.00	28	0.08	22	0.39	30	0.35	26	0.37
Moravec 1969	83	0.37	47	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	86	0.03	84	0.03
Morozova 2008	23	0.58	22	0.00	19	0.10	20	0.41	23	0.29	27	0.34
Neighaus 1950	3	0.67	14	0.01	4	0.21	5	0.68	2	0.66	3	0.67
Niedzielski 1931	59	0.47	54	0.00	67	0.05	63	0.05	42	0.12	57	0.08
Ohlsson 1999	28	0.56	34	0.00	35	0.05	38	0.18	47	0.07	48	0.11
Osinska 1989	9	0.62	39	0.00	17	0.08	15	0.48	27	0.41	17	0.44
Pachmann 1927	43	0.54	24	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.11	6	0.63	35	0.26
Paderewski 1930	18	0.59	33	0.00	25	0.07	28	0.31	2	0.59	18	0.43
Perlemuter 1992	36	0.55	43	0.00	34	0.06	36	0.24	21	0.40	29	0.31
Pierdomenico 2008	57	0.48	56	0.00	53	0.04	71	0.04	27	0.27	52	0.10
Poblocka 1999	17	0.59	61	0.00	20	0.08	24	0.35	33	0.25	30	0.30
Rabcewiczowa 1932	66	0.45	60	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	86	0.03	85	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923	73	0.42	58	0.00	70	0.04	68	0.04	74	0.04	73	0.04
Rangell 2001	34	0.55	18	0.00	13	0.12	13	0.51	2	0.60	10	0.55
Richter 1976	19	0.58	10	0.01	21	0.09	17	0.46	7	0.58	12	0.52
Rosen 1989	14	0.60	49	0.00	18	0.09	19	0.42	17	0.43	20	0.42
Rosenthal 1930	78	0.39	65	0.00	84	0.04	78	0.04	67	0.05	80	0.04
Rosenthal 1931	87	0.31	85	0.00	88	0.04	77	0.04	57	0.04	77	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b	85	0.34	86	0.00	85	0.04	75	0.04	55	0.05	81	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c	77	0.41	89	0.00	82	0.04	79	0.04	49	0.05	82	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d	84	0.35	80	0.00	87	0.03	87	0.03	61	0.04	87	0.03
Rossi 2007	76	0.41	91	0.00	81	0.03	84	0.03	40	0.15	61	0.07
Rubinstein 1939	86	0.34	68	0.00	75	0.03	82	0.03	48	0.06	75	0.04
Rubinstein 1952	60	0.46	46	0.00	71	0.06	50	0.06	39	0.17	54	0.10
Rubinstein 1966	53	0.50	45	0.00	46	0.07	47	0.07	34	0.27	40	0.14
Schilhawsky 1960	30	0.56	21	0.00	24	0.07	23	0.36	24	0.46	22	0.41
Shebanova 2002	10	0.62	55	0.00	16	0.12	16	0.47	28	0.39	19	0.43
Smith 1975	31	0.56	62	0.00	36	0.06	39	0.18	37	0.20	38	0.19
Sokolov 2002	42	0.54	20	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	59	0.05	65	0.05
Sztompka 1959	26	0.56	78	0.00	40	0.07	41	0.17	75	0.04	58	0.08
Tomsic 1995	48	0.53	36	0.00	60	0.05	62	0.05	43	0.11	62	0.07
Uninsky 1932	41	0.54	32	0.00	39	0.07	34	0.26	26	0.35	32	0.30
Uninsky 1971	24	0.57	6	0.02	15	0.13	18	0.45	25	0.35	23	0.40
Wasowski 1980	35	0.55	38	0.00	33	0.05	25	0.32	14	0.44	25	0.38
Zak 1937	12	0.61	3	0.05	5	0.16	4	0.69	5	0.65	2	0.67
Zak 1951	15	0.60	5	0.03	6	0.24	7	0.67	6	0.58	4	0.62
Average	1	0.75	1	0.52	1	0.52	1	0.85	37	0.31	14	0.51
Random 1	90	-0.05	82	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	57	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2	91	-0.08	70	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	68	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3	89	-0.03	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	56	0.04	91	0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).