Average

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		4	0.86	12	0.01	7	0.13	4	0.62	1	0.77	4	0.69
Anderszewski 2003		39	0.77	32	0.00	45	0.05	42	0.10	1	0.59	47	0.24
Ashkenazy 1981		18	0.81	31	0.00	8	0.11	10	0.51	1	0.75	12	0.62
Bacha 2000		59	0.70	66	0.00	61	0.04	71	0.04	1	0.69	54	0.17
Badura 1965		57	0.70	52	0.00	55	0.04	55	0.04	2	0.61	63	0.16
Barbosa 1983		72	0.64	51	0.00	62	0.04	57	0.04	2	0.69	56	0.17
Biret 1990		13	0.82	55	0.00	22	0.08	24	0.35	1	0.78	21	0.52
Blet 2003		27	0.80	72	0.00	46	0.06	51	0.06	1	0.70	51	0.20
Block 1995		68	0.66	76	0.00	63	0.05	53	0.05	1	0.62	52	0.18
Blumental 1952		73	0.64	73	0.00	58	0.04	66	0.04	4	0.43	78	0.13
Boshniakovich 1969		34	0.79	64	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.15	1	0.69	39	0.32
Brailowsky 1960		43	0.76	56	0.00	64	0.04	67	0.04	1	0.64	57	0.16
Bunin 1987		62	0.69	77	0.00	70	0.04	70	0.04	5	0.54	71	0.15
Bunin 1987b		63	0.68	81	0.00	69	0.04	69	0.04	6	0.54	66	0.15
Chiu 1999		60	0.69	65	0.00	54	0.04	60	0.04	1	0.69	55	0.17
Cohen 1997		88	0.46	39	0.00	88	0.04	61	0.04	14	0.33	88	0.11
Cortot 1951		42	0.76	84	0.00	56	0.05	54	0.05	3	0.68	53	0.18
Csalog 1996		83	0.56	82	0.00	82	0.03	87	0.03	14	0.42	87	0.11
Czerny 1949		26	0.80	27	0.01	27	0.06	16	0.41	1	0.75	16	0.55
Czerny 1990		3	0.88	13	0.01	5	0.12	5	0.59	1	0.77	6	0.67
Duchoud 2007		48	0.74	49	0.00	52	0.04	64	0.04	3	0.62	62	0.16
Ezaki 2006		2	0.89	3	0.04	3	0.16	3	0.63	1	0.83	2	0.72
Falvay 1989		53	0.73	38	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.11	9	0.56	42	0.25
Farrell 1958		35	0.78	43	0.00	47	0.07	50	0.07	1	0.67	49	0.22
Ferenczy 1958		54	0.72	24	0.01	59	0.05	52	0.05	6	0.49	60	0.16
Fliere 1977		1	0.92	1	0.46	1	0.45	1	0.75	1	0.87	1	0.81
Fou 1978		36	0.78	16	0.01	30	0.08	29	0.31	1	0.66	29	0.45
Francois 1956		38	0.77	54	0.00	38	0.05	35	0.20	2	0.68	35	0.37
Friedman 1923		87	0.51	90	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	12	0.49	83	0.12
Friedman 1923b		85	0.51	61	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	11	0.49	82	0.12
Friedman 1930		76	0.63	58	0.00	72	0.04	73	0.04	3	0.59	69	0.15
Garcia 2007		69	0.66	87	0.00	68	0.04	76	0.04	3	0.57	70	0.15
Garcia 2007b		84	0.54	85	0.00	77	0.04	75	0.04	2	0.55	74	0.15
Gierzod 1998		7	0.85	9	0.02	10	0.12	9	0.53	1	0.77	9	0.64
Gornostaeva 1994		23	0.80	41	0.00	39	0.06	37	0.17	1	0.78	37	0.36
Groot 1988		32	0.79	22	0.01	29	0.07	30	0.30	1	0.72	28	0.46
Harasiewicz 1955		41	0.76	2	0.09	4	0.14	6	0.59	1	0.75	7	0.67
Hatto 1993		70	0.66	21	0.01	50	0.09	46	0.09	3	0.67	45	0.25
Hatto 1997		56	0.71	29	0.00	33	0.07	36	0.19	3	0.69	36	0.36
Horowitz 1949		51	0.73	67	0.00	66	0.04	56	0.04	5	0.62	59	0.16
Indjic 1988		65	0.68	34	0.00	49	0.08	48	0.08	3	0.71	46	0.24
Kapell 1951		20	0.81	11	0.01	13	0.11	14	0.47	1	0.72	14	0.58
Kissin 1993		16	0.82	50	0.00	32	0.07	26	0.34	3	0.71	24	0.49
Kushner 1989		5	0.86	14	0.01	11	0.11	15	0.43	1	0.79	13	0.58
Luisada 1991		22	0.81	8	0.02	15	0.09	17	0.38	1	0.73	18	0.53
Lushtak 2004		24	0.80	40	0.00	12	0.09	11	0.51	1	0.76	11	0.62
Malcuzynski 1961		37	0.78	42	0.00	44	0.04	45	0.09	1	0.71	44	0.25
Magaloff 1978		29	0.79	4	0.04	17	0.08	32	0.25	1	0.73	32	0.43
Magin 1975		47	0.75	69	0.00	48	0.09	47	0.09	1	0.61	48	0.23
Michalowski 1933		79	0.62	78	0.00	65	0.04	74	0.04	4	0.53	68	0.15
Milkina 1970		14	0.82	19	0.01	31	0.08	23	0.35	1	0.75	22	0.51
Mohovich 1999		8	0.85	17	0.01	14	0.11	12	0.50	1	0.79	10	0.63
Moravec 1969		64	0.68	48	0.00	78	0.03	77	0.03	4	0.57	77	0.13
Morozova 2008		31	0.79	30	0.00	24	0.07	18	0.38	1	0.73	20	0.53
Neighaus 1950		6	0.85	5	0.04	2	0.14	2	0.64	1	0.80	3	0.72
Niedzielski 1931		61	0.69	23	0.01	57	0.04	63	0.04	4	0.58	65	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		11	0.83	25	0.01	19	0.07	22	0.35	1	0.64	27	0.47
Osinska 1989		9	0.84	37	0.00	21	0.08	20	0.37	1	0.77	19	0.53
Pachmann 1927		74	0.64	74	0.00	85	0.03	80	0.03	8	0.49	81	0.12
Paderewski 1930		45	0.75	68	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	1	0.60	67	0.15
Perlemuter 1992		28	0.80	59	0.00	26	0.08	27	0.32	1	0.72	26	0.48
Pierdomenico 2008		71	0.65	75	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	3	0.52	79	0.12
Poblocka 1999		25	0.80	45	0.00	18	0.07	28	0.31	1	0.63	31	0.44
Rabcewiczowa 1932		46	0.75	57	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.10	2	0.64	43	0.25
Rachmaninoff 1923		40	0.77	46	0.00	28	0.07	25	0.34	1	0.70	23	0.49
Rangell 2001		75	0.63	26	0.01	67	0.04	68	0.04	1	0.56	72	0.15
Richter 1976		67	0.67	44	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	9	0.48	80	0.12
Rosen 1989		19	0.81	6	0.03	23	0.09	19	0.38	1	0.77	17	0.54
Rosenthal 1930		58	0.70	86	0.00	71	0.03	78	0.03	5	0.68	75	0.14
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.61	47	0.00	79	0.02	88	0.02	6	0.63	86	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.61	88	0.00	81	0.04	58	0.04	6	0.59	73	0.15
Rosenthal 1931c		66	0.67	62	0.00	75	0.04	72	0.04	6	0.67	64	0.16
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.62	70	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	6	0.63	76	0.14
Rossi 2007		86	0.51	80	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	12	0.40	84	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		82	0.56	53	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	12	0.38	85	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		78	0.62	10	0.02	41	0.05	40	0.14	15	0.52	40	0.27
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.74	15	0.01	34	0.06	38	0.16	4	0.67	38	0.33
Schilhawsky 1960		30	0.79	36	0.00	25	0.08	21	0.36	1	0.66	25	0.49
Shebanova 2002		17	0.82	28	0.01	36	0.08	33	0.21	1	0.71	33	0.39
Smith 1975		10	0.83	7	0.02	9	0.10	8	0.54	1	0.82	5	0.67
Sokolov 2002		33	0.79	60	0.00	35	0.06	34	0.20	1	0.74	34	0.38
Sztompka 1959		12	0.82	20	0.01	20	0.07	31	0.28	1	0.72	30	0.45
Tomsic 1995		55	0.72	79	0.00	73	0.04	62	0.04	6	0.62	58	0.16
Uninsky 1932		52	0.73	71	0.00	53	0.04	65	0.04	3	0.65	61	0.16
Uninsky 1971		50	0.74	63	0.00	51	0.07	49	0.07	2	0.62	50	0.21
Wasowski 1980		44	0.76	35	0.00	40	0.05	43	0.10	1	0.67	41	0.26
Zak 1937		15	0.82	33	0.00	16	0.10	13	0.48	2	0.69	15	0.58
Zak 1951		21	0.81	18	0.01	6	0.11	7	0.56	2	0.76	8	0.65
Average		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 1		91	-0.18	91	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	76	0.02	91	0.01
Random 2		90	-0.11	83	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	75	0.03	90	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.06	89	0.00	90	0.02	90	0.02	68	0.04	89	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).