Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	5	0.66	2	0.11	6	0.22	3	0.56	5	0.58	4	0.57
Anderszewski 2003	43	0.52	57	0.00	36	0.05	38	0.13	22	0.39	37	0.23
Ashkenazy 1981	7	0.65	7	0.03	9	0.16	4	0.56	11	0.54	8	0.55
Bacha 2000	77	0.39	85	0.00	78	0.05	66	0.05	82	0.03	75	0.04
Badura 1965	47	0.51	45	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	18	0.40	46	0.15
Barbosa 1983	73	0.45	27	0.00	60	0.06	56	0.06	59	0.05	73	0.05
Biret 1990	46	0.51	67	0.00	59	0.07	48	0.07	59	0.05	66	0.06
Blet 2003	34	0.56	19	0.01	40	0.06	35	0.16	8	0.49	33	0.28
Block 1995	61	0.49	17	0.01	29	0.07	33	0.17	19	0.37	34	0.25
Blumental 1952	50	0.51	9	0.03	11	0.11	30	0.26	6	0.44	25	0.34
Boshniakovich 1969	30	0.56	87	0.00	45	0.04	74	0.04	40	0.17	59	0.08
Brailowsky 1960	80	0.37	66	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	72	0.04	81	0.03
Bunin 1987	54	0.50	43	0.00	57	0.07	47	0.07	23	0.34	47	0.15
Bunin 1987b	58	0.50	70	0.00	58	0.07	49	0.07	26	0.32	45	0.15
Chiu 1999	76	0.44	53	0.00	73	0.04	79	0.04	59	0.04	76	0.04
Cohen 1997	86	0.29	49	0.00	86	0.03	81	0.03	77	0.04	86	0.03
Cortot 1951	16	0.60	50	0.00	10	0.12	13	0.45	2	0.73	5	0.57
Csalog 1996	83	0.33	73	0.00	81	0.03	84	0.03	86	0.03	85	0.03
Czerny 1949	6	0.66	12	0.02	5	0.16	5	0.55	10	0.60	3	0.57
Czerny 1990	1	0.72	1	0.34	1	0.33	1	0.74	3	0.74	1	0.74
Duchoud 2007	49	0.51	69	0.00	51	0.05	62	0.05	21	0.40	49	0.14
Ezaki 2006	24	0.58	56	0.00	43	0.05	41	0.11	54	0.06	56	0.08
Falvay 1989	74	0.45	26	0.00	77	0.05	69	0.05	65	0.05	68	0.05
Farrell 1958	35	0.56	48	0.00	42	0.05	36	0.15	5	0.51	31	0.28
Ferenczy 1958	45	0.52	55	0.00	35	0.05	42	0.10	9	0.46	40	0.21
Fliere 1977	3	0.67	22	0.01	12	0.12	11	0.49	31	0.39	15	0.44
Fou 1978	40	0.53	37	0.00	50	0.05	70	0.05	60	0.05	69	0.05
Francois 1956	36	0.55	51	0.00	39	0.05	39	0.13	15	0.50	35	0.25
Friedman 1923	59	0.50	88	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.14	6	0.59	30	0.29
Friedman 1923b	57	0.50	34	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.19	6	0.61	26	0.34
Friedman 1930	39	0.53	30	0.00	30	0.06	29	0.26	8	0.53	23	0.37
Garcia 2007	72	0.46	76	0.00	53	0.06	53	0.06	6	0.61	41	0.19
Garcia 2007b	71	0.46	89	0.00	41	0.05	44	0.09	6	0.56	38	0.22
Gierzod 1998	14	0.61	61	0.00	13	0.10	12	0.47	18	0.48	14	0.47
Gornostaeva 1994	31	0.56	38	0.00	34	0.06	40	0.13	37	0.18	48	0.15
Groot 1988	42	0.52	5	0.03	33	0.06	34	0.17	48	0.06	53	0.10
Harasiewicz 1955	25	0.58	52	0.00	17	0.08	16	0.40	29	0.28	28	0.33
Hatto 1993	70	0.46	62	0.00	56	0.09	45	0.09	58	0.06	62	0.07
Hatto 1997	64	0.48	81	0.00	54	0.05	61	0.05	36	0.16	55	0.09
Horowitz 1949	68	0.47	40	0.00	74	0.05	68	0.05	46	0.06	71	0.05
Indjic 1988	66	0.47	82	0.00	55	0.06	55	0.06	67	0.05	72	0.05
Kapell 1951	9	0.64	4	0.08	3	0.21	8	0.53	4	0.54	10	0.53
Kissin 1993	19	0.60	10	0.02	25	0.08	25	0.28	34	0.20	36	0.24
Kushner 1989	10	0.63	15	0.01	21	0.09	20	0.37	18	0.44	20	0.40
Luisada 1991	44	0.52	78	0.00	61	0.05	67	0.05	57	0.05	67	0.05
Lushtak 2004	38	0.54	68	0.00	46	0.05	63	0.05	45	0.07	64	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961	21	0.59	8	0.03	27	0.09	26	0.28	23	0.32	29	0.30
Magaloff 1978	52	0.51	28	0.00	66	0.04	75	0.04	71	0.04	77	0.04
Magin 1975	55	0.50	42	0.00	65	0.04	78	0.04	62	0.04	78	0.04
Michalowski 1933	27	0.57	63	0.00	14	0.14	14	0.45	2	0.63	11	0.53
Milkina 1970	51	0.51	44	0.00	63	0.05	71	0.05	55	0.06	70	0.05
Mohovich 1999	41	0.53	18	0.01	52	0.06	58	0.06	48	0.07	65	0.06
Moravec 1969	60	0.49	36	0.00	62	0.05	64	0.05	32	0.21	52	0.10
Morozova 2008	15	0.61	6	0.03	16	0.09	15	0.43	11	0.44	16	0.43
Neighaus 1950	4	0.67	11	0.02	8	0.18	6	0.54	3	0.59	6	0.56
Niedzielski 1931	56	0.50	16	0.01	49	0.05	65	0.05	12	0.49	43	0.16
Ohlsson 1999	17	0.60	13	0.02	26	0.09	27	0.27	30	0.30	32	0.28
Osinska 1989	26	0.58	83	0.00	37	0.05	31	0.20	36	0.22	39	0.21
Pachmann 1927	81	0.36	32	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	65	0.04	83	0.03
Paderewski 1930	29	0.57	25	0.00	19	0.08	24	0.31	2	0.57	17	0.42
Perlemuter 1992	20	0.60	46	0.00	23	0.08	18	0.38	5	0.58	13	0.47
Pierdomenico 2008	69	0.46	60	0.00	72	0.04	77	0.04	38	0.17	57	0.08
Poblocka 1999	2	0.67	65	0.00	4	0.14	7	0.53	4	0.53	9	0.53
Rabcewiczowa 1932	13	0.61	21	0.01	15	0.16	9	0.53	3	0.58	7	0.55
Rachmaninoff 1923	37	0.54	29	0.00	28	0.09	21	0.31	17	0.44	22	0.37
Rangell 2001	67	0.47	41	0.00	71	0.04	76	0.04	39	0.14	61	0.07
Richter 1976	33	0.56	33	0.00	48	0.06	54	0.06	19	0.41	44	0.16
Rosen 1989	28	0.57	72	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.09	41	0.13	51	0.11
Rosenthal 1930	63	0.48	54	0.00	69	0.06	52	0.06	19	0.47	42	0.17
Rosenthal 1931	84	0.31	84	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	63	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b	85	0.29	80	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	81	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c	75	0.44	74	0.00	75	0.06	50	0.06	40	0.18	54	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d	87	0.28	79	0.00	87	0.04	80	0.04	78	0.03	87	0.03
Rossi 2007	79	0.38	58	0.00	76	0.06	59	0.06	25	0.27	50	0.13
Rubinstein 1939	82	0.34	31	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	73	0.04	82	0.03
Rubinstein 1952	78	0.39	35	0.00	79	0.06	57	0.06	76	0.04	74	0.05
Rubinstein 1966	48	0.51	64	0.00	68	0.06	60	0.06	51	0.08	60	0.07
Schilhawsky 1960	32	0.56	59	0.00	31	0.07	28	0.26	27	0.41	27	0.33
Shebanova 2002	12	0.62	23	0.01	18	0.07	17	0.39	28	0.38	21	0.38
Smith 1975	22	0.59	75	0.00	22	0.10	19	0.37	13	0.46	18	0.41
Sokolov 2002	18	0.60	14	0.01	24	0.09	22	0.31	17	0.42	24	0.36
Sztompka 1959	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Tomsic 1995	53	0.50	24	0.00	67	0.05	72	0.05	41	0.12	58	0.08
Uninsky 1932	8	0.65	3	0.10	2	0.19	2	0.58	2	0.69	2	0.63
Uninsky 1971	11	0.62	47	0.00	7	0.22	10	0.51	7	0.53	12	0.52
Wasowski 1980	23	0.59	20	0.01	20	0.09	23	0.31	5	0.52	19	0.40
Zak 1937	62	0.48	39	0.00	64	0.04	73	0.04	73	0.04	79	0.04
Zak 1951	65	0.47	71	0.00	70	0.08	46	0.08	69	0.04	63	0.06
Random 1	90	-0.06	77	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	34	0.16	80	0.04
Random 2	89	-0.04	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	67	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3	88	-0.02	86	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	51	0.04	89	0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).