Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	38	-0.02	19	0.01	15	0.07	14	0.39	88	0.02	15	0.09
Anderszewski 2003	61	-0.05	42	0.00	66	0.03	65	0.03	90	0.01	63	0.02
Ashkenazy 1981	50	-0.04	82	0.00	62	0.04	61	0.04	89	0.01	68	0.02
Bacha 2000	42	-0.02	63	0.00	36	0.05	39	0.14	88	0.02	31	0.05
Badura 1965	47	-0.04	64	0.00	43	0.06	40	0.12	90	0.01	51	0.03
Barbosa 1983	14	0.00	12	0.03	12	0.08	26	0.27	88	0.01	34	0.05
Biret 1990	13	0.01	25	0.00	21	0.07	20	0.33	87	0.02	23	0.08
Blet 2003	87	-0.09	87	0.00	86	0.02	76	0.02	90	0.01	82	0.01
Block 1995	84	-0.08	52	0.00	84	0.02	80	0.02	90	0.01	85	0.01
Blumental 1952	24	0.00	59	0.00	35	0.07	36	0.19	88	0.02	29	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969	79	-0.08	46	0.00	73	0.03	69	0.03	90	0.01	66	0.02
Brailowsky 1960	49	-0.04	13	0.03	16	0.07	30	0.23	89	0.02	24	0.07
Bunin 1987	37	-0.02	18	0.01	32	0.07	29	0.24	88	0.01	36	0.05
Bunin 1987b	34	-0.01	67	0.00	31	0.05	28	0.26	88	0.02	27	0.07
Chiu 1999	48	-0.04	73	0.00	58	0.05	48	0.05	89	0.01	56	0.02
Cohen 1997	7	0.02	23	0.01	30	0.05	27	0.26	89	0.01	35	0.05
Cortot 1951	15	0.00	27	0.00	34	0.06	33	0.21	90	0.01	37	0.05
Csalog 1996	86	-0.09	66	0.00	80	0.02	83	0.02	90	0.01	81	0.01
Czerny 1949	12	0.01	11	0.03	7	0.09	8	0.44	88	0.02	14	0.09
Czerny 1990	32	-0.01	43	0.00	51	0.04	55	0.04	88	0.02	53	0.03
Duchoud 2007	53	-0.04	14	0.02	39	0.06	38	0.16	89	0.01	40	0.04
Ezaki 2006	30	-0.01	24	0.01	24	0.07	19	0.33	89	0.02	18	0.08
Falvay 1989	70	-0.07	71	0.00	70	0.02	74	0.02	88	0.01	74	0.01
Farrell 1958	9	0.01	16	0.01	13	0.11	21	0.33	88	0.02	21	0.08
Ferenczy 1958	83	-0.08	80	0.00	61	0.03	64	0.03	89	0.01	64	0.02
Fliere 1977	82	-0.08	70	0.00	85	0.02	82	0.02	89	0.01	72	0.01
Fou 1978	73	-0.07	81	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	90	0.01	77	0.01
Francois 1956	36	-0.02	36	0.00	37	0.06	37	0.16	88	0.02	30	0.06
Friedman 1923	68	-0.06	83	0.00	76	0.02	79	0.02	89	0.01	90	0.01
Friedman 1923b	66	-0.06	88	0.00	77	0.02	77	0.02	89	0.01	86	0.01
Friedman 1930	39	-0.02	49	0.00	50	0.05	46	0.05	88	0.02	50	0.03
Garcia 2007	76	-0.07	58	0.00	81	0.02	78	0.02	89	0.01	84	0.01
Garcia 2007b	64	-0.06	33	0.00	60	0.03	62	0.03	90	0.01	70	0.02
Gierzod 1998	17	0.00	44	0.00	27	0.07	13	0.39	89	0.02	16	0.09
Gornostaeva 1994	71	-0.07	26	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	90	0.01	69	0.02
Groot 1988	77	-0.07	77	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	90	0.01	87	0.01
Harasiewicz 1955	67	-0.06	61	0.00	68	0.02	72	0.02	89	0.01	89	0.01
Hatto 1993	1	0.03	53	0.00	9	0.13	6	0.47	87	0.03	5	0.12
Hatto 1997	2	0.03	1	0.17	1	0.17	1	0.56	88	0.03	3	0.13
Horowitz 1949	11	0.01	35	0.00	19	0.07	17	0.34	86	0.03	8	0.10
Indjic 1988	3	0.03	50	0.00	8	0.08	5	0.47	88	0.03	4	0.12
Kapell 1951	56	-0.04	31	0.00	59	0.05	52	0.05	90	0.01	58	0.02
Kissin 1993	59	-0.05	56	0.00	48	0.05	45	0.05	89	0.02	48	0.03
Kushner 1989	69	-0.07	65	0.00	75	0.02	81	0.02	90	0.01	78	0.01
Luisada 1991	46	-0.04	51	0.00	45	0.04	57	0.04	88	0.02	42	0.03
Lushtak 2004	52	-0.04	20	0.01	53	0.04	53	0.04	88	0.02	52	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961	63	-0.05	47	0.00	74	0.03	66	0.03	90	0.01	59	0.02
Magaloff 1978	23	0.00	17	0.01	29	0.06	31	0.22	88	0.02	25	0.07
Magin 1975	62	-0.05	90	0.00	56	0.04	54	0.04	89	0.01	57	0.02
Michalowski 1933	31	-0.01	68	0.00	41	0.04	42	0.12	88	0.01	47	0.03
Milkina 1970	19	0.00	40	0.00	33	0.05	24	0.28	88	0.02	26	0.07
Mohovich 1999	60	-0.05	55	0.00	69	0.03	70	0.03	88	0.02	67	0.02
Moravec 1969	16	0.00	4	0.06	4	0.08	3	0.50	88	0.02	7	0.10
Morozova 2008	21	0.00	29	0.00	23	0.07	12	0.40	88	0.02	12	0.09
Neighaus 1950	81	-0.08	89	0.00	87	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.01
Niedzielski 1931	45	-0.03	54	0.00	49	0.04	56	0.04	88	0.02	45	0.03
Ohlsson 1999	51	-0.04	79	0.00	63	0.04	59	0.04	89	0.01	62	0.02
Osinska 1989	43	-0.03	28	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.12	88	0.02	32	0.05
Pachmann 1927	58	-0.05	21	0.01	28	0.06	32	0.22	88	0.01	33	0.05
Paderewski 1930	33	-0.01	8	0.05	17	0.07	23	0.29	88	0.02	22	0.08
Perlemuter 1992	90	-0.11	41	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	90	0.01	73	0.01
Pierdomenico 2008	78	-0.08	62	0.00	72	0.02	75	0.02	89	0.01	76	0.01
Poblocka 1999	54	-0.04	57	0.00	52	0.05	51	0.05	88	0.02	43	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932	4	0.02	7	0.05	14	0.07	18	0.33	88	0.02	20	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923	20	0.00	39	0.00	25	0.07	22	0.30	88	0.02	19	0.08
Rangell 2001	25	0.00	6	0.05	26	0.06	35	0.19	89	0.01	41	0.04
Richter 1976	75	-0.07	74	0.00	54	0.05	49	0.05	90	0.01	60	0.02
Rosen 1989	65	-0.06	84	0.00	64	0.03	63	0.03	89	0.01	65	0.02
Rosenthal 1930	8	0.01	5	0.06	5	0.08	10	0.42	88	0.02	17	0.09
Rosenthal 1931	22	0.00	45	0.00	18	0.07	7	0.45	86	0.02	11	0.09
Rosenthal 1931b	18	0.00	15	0.02	11	0.11	4	0.48	80	0.02	10	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c	29	-0.01	78	0.00	40	0.05	41	0.12	88	0.02	38	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d	6	0.02	9	0.04	3	0.09	2	0.55	86	0.02	9	0.10
Rossi 2007	89	-0.10	60	0.00	65	0.03	68	0.03	90	0.01	55	0.02
Rubinstein 1939	41	-0.02	38	0.00	57	0.04	58	0.04	89	0.02	44	0.03
Rubinstein 1952	35	-0.01	76	0.00	46	0.05	47	0.05	88	0.02	54	0.03
Rubinstein 1966	40	-0.02	48	0.00	47	0.05	50	0.05	88	0.02	49	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960	27	-0.01	34	0.00	20	0.07	15	0.39	87	0.03	6	0.11
Shebanova 2002	57	-0.05	72	0.00	71	0.02	73	0.02	90	0.01	83	0.01
Smith 1975	88	-0.09	69	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	90	0.01	75	0.01
Sokolov 2002	10	0.01	32	0.00	22	0.07	16	0.38	89	0.01	28	0.06
Sztompka 1959	55	-0.04	85	0.00	67	0.03	67	0.03	90	0.01	61	0.02
Tomsic 1995	74	-0.07	22	0.01	44	0.05	44	0.09	90	0.01	46	0.03
Uninsky 1932	28	-0.01	3	0.06	10	0.08	11	0.41	88	0.02	13	0.09
Uninsky 1971	44	-0.03	37	0.00	38	0.05	34	0.19	88	0.01	39	0.04
Wasowski 1980	85	-0.08	30	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	71	0.01
Zak 1937	80	-0.08	86	0.00	78	0.02	85	0.02	88	0.01	79	0.01
Zak 1951	72	-0.07	75	0.00	79	0.02	71	0.02	88	0.01	80	0.01
Random 1	26	-0.01	10	0.03	6	0.09	25	0.27	9	0.39	2	0.32
Random 2	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 3	5	0.02	2	0.10	2	0.10	9	0.44	8	0.44	1	0.44

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).