Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	29	0.57	79	0.00	35	0.05	27	0.33	21	0.46	28	0.39
Anderszewski 2003	14	0.61	6	0.05	4	0.10	11	0.49	4	0.57	16	0.53
Ashkenazy 1981	28	0.57	28	0.00	24	0.09	24	0.40	13	0.52	26	0.46
Bacha 2000	81	0.37	72	0.00	75	0.02	83	0.02	39	0.17	82	0.06
Badura 1965	31	0.56	26	0.01	47	0.06	48	0.06	15	0.43	49	0.16
Barbosa 1983	42	0.53	65	0.00	54	0.07	47	0.07	23	0.37	48	0.16
Biret 1990	58	0.48	53	0.00	50	0.07	46	0.07	19	0.36	50	0.16
Blet 2003	51	0.51	43	0.00	57	0.05	59	0.05	21	0.32	58	0.13
Block 1995	25	0.58	21	0.01	26	0.08	26	0.34	2	0.67	25	0.48
Blumental 1952	69	0.44	75	0.00	67	0.04	69	0.04	37	0.14	79	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969	11	0.61	7	0.04	6	0.09	9	0.52	2	0.69	6	0.60
Brailowsky 1960	44	0.52	54	0.00	60	0.05	61	0.05	11	0.57	46	0.17
Bunin 1987	56	0.50	88	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.15	10	0.49	40	0.27
Bunin 1987b	57	0.50	83	0.00	43	0.08	42	0.15	11	0.49	39	0.27
Chiu 1999	38	0.55	51	0.00	65	0.05	57	0.05	33	0.27	60	0.12
Cohen 1997	85	0.34	41	0.00	87	0.04	66	0.04	71	0.04	87	0.04
Cortot 1951	65	0.46	59	0.00	69	0.03	71	0.03	13	0.47	64	0.12
Csalog 1996	87	0.31	87	0.00	86	0.04	70	0.04	50	0.06	84	0.05
Czerny 1949	7	0.62	17	0.01	9	0.08	8	0.52	7	0.64	7	0.58
Czerny 1990	9	0.62	25	0.01	19	0.11	10	0.50	11	0.61	11	0.55
Duchoud 2007	76	0.41	86	0.00	68	0.03	73	0.03	33	0.21	74	0.08
Ezaki 2006	1	0.66	5	0.05	7	0.10	12	0.48	6	0.60	12	0.54
Falvay 1989	41	0.53	29	0.00	56	0.05	62	0.05	31	0.30	61	0.12
Farrell 1958	66	0.46	78	0.00	70	0.04	63	0.04	29	0.25	70	0.10
Ferenczy 1958	64	0.46	52	0.00	72	0.03	77	0.03	22	0.35	71	0.10
Fliere 1977	2	0.64	8	0.04	8	0.11	5	0.53	10	0.57	9	0.55
Fou 1978	12	0.61	12	0.02	13	0.08	6	0.53	6	0.58	10	0.55
Francois 1956	53	0.50	71	0.00	52	0.05	56	0.05	25	0.41	57	0.14
Friedman 1923	74	0.42	84	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	29	0.22	81	0.07
Friedman 1923b	72	0.43	47	0.00	81	0.03	78	0.03	28	0.24	75	0.08
Friedman 1930	49	0.51	31	0.00	61	0.04	67	0.04	20	0.42	59	0.13
Garcia 2007	70	0.44	64	0.00	66	0.04	68	0.04	9	0.56	53	0.15
Garcia 2007b	78	0.41	67	0.00	80	0.02	82	0.02	24	0.27	80	0.07
Gierzod 1998	26	0.58	40	0.00	22	0.10	16	0.46	11	0.52	23	0.49
Gornostaeva 1994	30	0.57	48	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.27	16	0.54	29	0.38
Groot 1988	46	0.51	73	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.19	25	0.38	41	0.27
Harasiewicz 1955	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1993	50	0.51	66	0.00	29	0.05	33	0.24	11	0.48	33	0.34
Hatto 1997	54	0.50	62	0.00	25	0.08	30	0.27	11	0.45	32	0.35
Horowitz 1949	40	0.53	33	0.00	48	0.06	52	0.06	5	0.63	45	0.19
Indjic 1988	55	0.50	46	0.00	30	0.09	35	0.23	12	0.42	37	0.31
Kapell 1951	35	0.55	11	0.03	11	0.08	14	0.47	5	0.53	21	0.50
Kissin 1993	8	0.62	13	0.02	12	0.08	17	0.46	11	0.60	15	0.53
Kushner 1989	32	0.56	9	0.03	41	0.10	34	0.24	21	0.40	36	0.31
Luisada 1991	33	0.56	58	0.00	53	0.07	45	0.07	32	0.31	51	0.15
Lushtak 2004	16	0.60	70	0.00	39	0.08	32	0.26	9	0.54	30	0.37
Malcuzynski 1961	10	0.61	1	0.18	1	0.18	1	0.62	2	0.70	1	0.66
Magaloff 1978	48	0.51	45	0.00	49	0.06	53	0.06	23	0.33	55	0.14
Magin 1975	21	0.59	39	0.00	18	0.10	22	0.43	7	0.57	20	0.50
Michalowski 1933	61	0.48	77	0.00	64	0.05	55	0.05	16	0.40	56	0.14
Milkina 1970	24	0.58	14	0.02	10	0.08	4	0.55	3	0.66	5	0.60
Mohovich 1999	27	0.58	20	0.01	21	0.11	18	0.45	6	0.65	14	0.54
Moravec 1969	68	0.45	32	0.00	59	0.04	65	0.04	28	0.28	65	0.11
Morozova 2008	22	0.58	49	0.00	46	0.06	49	0.06	28	0.25	63	0.12
Neighaus 1950	18	0.60	44	0.00	14	0.08	15	0.47	5	0.57	17	0.52
Niedzielski 1931	79	0.39	36	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	36	0.16	78	0.07
Ohlsson 1999	43	0.52	24	0.01	44	0.07	43	0.14	33	0.30	44	0.20
Osinska 1989	5	0.62	4	0.05	20	0.12	13	0.47	6	0.62	13	0.54
Pachmann 1927	71	0.44	50	0.00	76	0.03	79	0.03	22	0.38	68	0.11
Paderewski 1930	73	0.42	56	0.00	78	0.02	87	0.02	36	0.17	83	0.06
Perlemuter 1992	15	0.61	61	0.00	33	0.06	28	0.33	2	0.62	27	0.45
Pierdomenico 2008	59	0.48	60	0.00	63	0.05	60	0.05	12	0.45	52	0.15
Poblocka 1999	45	0.52	76	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.21	19	0.41	38	0.29
Rabcewiczowa 1932	63	0.47	37	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	26	0.26	67	0.11
Rachmaninoff 1923	34	0.55	80	0.00	32	0.05	38	0.21	13	0.47	35	0.31
Rangell 2001	67	0.45	15	0.01	45	0.06	50	0.06	6	0.49	47	0.17
Richter 1976	6	0.62	10	0.03	15	0.08	20	0.44	5	0.59	19	0.51
Rosen 1989	36	0.55	30	0.00	40	0.08	40	0.16	22	0.40	42	0.25
Rosenthal 1930	77	0.41	89	0.00	71	0.03	72	0.03	21	0.36	72	0.10
Rosenthal 1931	80	0.37	82	0.00	84	0.03	80	0.03	24	0.45	62	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b	83	0.35	63	0.00	85	0.03	74	0.03	21	0.43	69	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c	82	0.36	42	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	34	0.29	77	0.08
Rosenthal 1931d	86	0.34	85	0.00	77	0.02	84	0.02	23	0.36	76	0.08
Rossi 2007	60	0.48	34	0.00	79	0.03	81	0.03	17	0.40	66	0.11
Rubinstein 1939	84	0.35	55	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	54	0.05	85	0.04
Rubinstein 1952	75	0.41	27	0.00	58	0.05	58	0.05	37	0.18	73	0.09
Rubinstein 1966	62	0.48	35	0.00	27	0.08	44	0.14	27	0.36	43	0.22
Schilhawsky 1960	4	0.62	19	0.01	28	0.07	25	0.40	7	0.58	24	0.48
Shebanova 2002	52	0.51	69	0.00	62	0.04	64	0.04	76	0.04	86	0.04
Smith 1975	3	0.64	23	0.01	23	0.10	23	0.42	3	0.61	18	0.51
Sokolov 2002	37	0.55	68	0.00	17	0.10	21	0.44	2	0.55	22	0.49
Sztompka 1959	23	0.58	57	0.00	36	0.06	29	0.28	16	0.40	34	0.33
Tomsic 1995	39	0.54	38	0.00	34	0.06	36	0.22	11	0.55	31	0.35
Uninsky 1932	17	0.60	22	0.01	16	0.09	19	0.45	3	0.69	8	0.56
Uninsky 1971	19	0.59	2	0.14	3	0.19	3	0.55	2	0.67	3	0.61
Wasowski 1980	47	0.51	18	0.01	51	0.06	51	0.06	20	0.32	54	0.14
Zak 1937	20	0.59	16	0.01	5	0.10	7	0.53	3	0.67	4	0.60
Zak 1951	13	0.61	3	0.14	2	0.18	2	0.60	2	0.67	2	0.63
Random 1	89	-0.07	81	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	63	0.03	88	0.02
Random 2	88	-0.06	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	72	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3	90	-0.07	74	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	65	0.03	89	0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).