Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	8	0.64	2	0.16	2	0.15	3	0.58	3	0.59	5	0.58
Anderszewski 2003	23	0.61	12	0.02	25	0.07	9	0.53	1	0.63	4	0.58
Ashkenazy 1981	18	0.62	37	0.00	22	0.08	12	0.52	12	0.53	15	0.52
Bacha 2000	45	0.53	33	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	5	0.58	44	0.24
Badura 1965	50	0.52	43	0.00	42	0.11	41	0.24	6	0.57	41	0.37
Barbosa 1983	72	0.46	58	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	70	0.04	88	0.03
Biret 1990	51	0.52	84	0.00	48	0.05	52	0.05	50	0.06	83	0.05
Blet 2003	65	0.47	83	0.00	78	0.02	87	0.02	53	0.05	89	0.03
Block 1995	73	0.46	66	0.00	54	0.05	58	0.05	32	0.20	62	0.10
Blumental 1952	43	0.54	22	0.01	19	0.06	37	0.34	3	0.49	35	0.41
Boshniakovich 1969	10	0.64	4	0.11	7	0.12	16	0.49	7	0.66	8	0.57
Brailowsky 1960	52	0.51	35	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	23	0.39	55	0.12
Bunin 1987	71	0.46	71	0.00	83	0.04	64	0.04	57	0.05	87	0.04
Bunin 1987b	74	0.46	77	0.00	82	0.03	72	0.03	53	0.05	86	0.04
Chiu 1999	79	0.43	87	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	45	0.07	81	0.05
Cohen 1997	85	0.38	73	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	26	0.27	71	0.09
Cortot 1951	63	0.48	64	0.00	63	0.04	69	0.04	28	0.27	64	0.10
Csalog 1996	75	0.45	74	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	29	0.29	67	0.09
Czerny 1949	7	0.64	5	0.04	5	0.18	2	0.59	4	0.68	1	0.63
Czerny 1990	22	0.61	54	0.00	21	0.05	22	0.44	14	0.47	30	0.45
Duchoud 2007	64	0.47	79	0.00	72	0.03	73	0.03	38	0.17	78	0.07
Ezaki 2006	5	0.64	38	0.00	29	0.07	23	0.44	11	0.50	23	0.47
Falvay 1989	40	0.54	36	0.00	49	0.05	54	0.05	35	0.21	59	0.10
Farrell 1958	58	0.49	72	0.00	64	0.04	67	0.04	41	0.13	75	0.07
Ferenczy 1958	60	0.49	49	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	28	0.27	68	0.09
Fliere 1977	2	0.66	13	0.01	6	0.18	5	0.57	13	0.57	7	0.57
Fou 1978	35	0.56	20	0.01	16	0.08	35	0.34	22	0.41	39	0.37
Francois 1956	38	0.55	63	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	24	0.43	47	0.17
Friedman 1923	84	0.38	61	0.00	74	0.02	85	0.02	28	0.28	80	0.07
Friedman 1923b	83	0.39	80	0.00	73	0.03	84	0.03	24	0.31	63	0.10
Friedman 1930	61	0.49	70	0.00	43	0.08	43	0.15	12	0.50	43	0.27
Garcia 2007	82	0.40	50	0.00	80	0.03	75	0.03	16	0.36	61	0.10
Garcia 2007b	86	0.37	78	0.00	79	0.02	86	0.02	25	0.26	79	0.07
Gierzod 1998	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Gornostaeva 1994	15	0.63	29	0.00	36	0.09	31	0.38	6	0.61	22	0.48
Groot 1988	56	0.50	19	0.01	52	0.06	49	0.06	53	0.05	84	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955	31	0.58	17	0.01	8	0.08	11	0.52	16	0.46	21	0.49
Hatto 1993	39	0.54	41	0.00	24	0.07	19	0.47	8	0.54	18	0.50
Hatto 1997	34	0.56	32	0.00	17	0.06	17	0.48	5	0.53	17	0.50
Horowitz 1949	66	0.47	82	0.00	69	0.03	83	0.03	35	0.35	60	0.10
Indjic 1988	36	0.55	40	0.00	23	0.05	20	0.47	8	0.57	14	0.52
Kapell 1951	28	0.59	57	0.00	34	0.09	29	0.39	18	0.39	37	0.39
Kissin 1993	12	0.64	1	0.19	1	0.18	6	0.55	14	0.54	11	0.54
Kushner 1989	1	0.67	14	0.01	11	0.07	8	0.54	7	0.58	9	0.56
Luisada 1991	33	0.57	27	0.00	26	0.08	33	0.36	19	0.48	34	0.42
Lushtak 2004	30	0.58	21	0.01	32	0.09	34	0.36	11	0.52	32	0.43
Malcuzynski 1961	14	0.64	24	0.01	30	0.08	14	0.50	6	0.60	10	0.55
Magaloff 1978	17	0.62	28	0.00	37	0.10	30	0.38	6	0.53	27	0.45
Magin 1975	32	0.58	8	0.03	15	0.06	24	0.43	11	0.50	26	0.46
Michalowski 1933	78	0.43	85	0.00	59	0.07	47	0.07	15	0.40	45	0.17
Milkina 1970	29	0.59	46	0.00	40	0.14	36	0.34	21	0.41	40	0.37
Mohovich 1999	21	0.61	26	0.00	39	0.14	32	0.38	20	0.49	33	0.43
Moravec 1969	44	0.53	47	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	18	0.39	49	0.14
Morozova 2008	41	0.54	25	0.00	41	0.10	42	0.24	18	0.33	42	0.28
Neighaus 1950	9	0.64	30	0.00	12	0.08	10	0.52	4	0.57	12	0.54
Niedzielski 1931	47	0.53	15	0.01	18	0.05	38	0.33	4	0.61	28	0.45
Ohlsson 1999	3	0.66	3	0.12	3	0.13	4	0.58	4	0.59	3	0.58
Osinska 1989	13	0.64	45	0.00	27	0.07	21	0.44	9	0.54	19	0.49
Pachmann 1927	80	0.42	60	0.00	86	0.03	71	0.03	38	0.18	77	0.07
Paderewski 1930	54	0.50	86	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	11	0.36	56	0.12
Perlemuter 1992	57	0.50	65	0.00	55	0.05	59	0.05	34	0.21	58	0.10
Pierdomenico 2008	70	0.47	42	0.00	76	0.03	70	0.03	32	0.23	73	0.08
Poblocka 1999	11	0.64	18	0.01	10	0.08	13	0.51	3	0.56	13	0.53
Rabcewiczowa 1932	49	0.52	52	0.00	45	0.05	51	0.05	21	0.36	52	0.13
Rachmaninoff 1923	77	0.44	81	0.00	57	0.05	50	0.05	48	0.06	82	0.05
Rangell 2001	55	0.50	48	0.00	62	0.04	65	0.04	35	0.20	72	0.09
Richter 1976	69	0.47	55	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	40	0.17	76	0.07
Rosen 1989	6	0.64	16	0.01	13	0.11	7	0.54	5	0.63	6	0.58
Rosenthal 1930	46	0.53	67	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	16	0.50	51	0.14
Rosenthal 1931	67	0.47	44	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	15	0.56	48	0.15
Rosenthal 1931b	68	0.47	51	0.00	67	0.03	76	0.03	12	0.56	54	0.13
Rosenthal 1931c	42	0.54	23	0.01	47	0.05	56	0.05	14	0.57	46	0.17
Rosenthal 1931d	76	0.45	76	0.00	68	0.04	62	0.04	22	0.37	57	0.12
Rossi 2007	87	0.32	53	0.00	87	0.04	61	0.04	51	0.05	85	0.04
Rubinstein 1939	81	0.42	68	0.00	85	0.03	78	0.03	37	0.16	74	0.07
Rubinstein 1952	59	0.49	59	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	40	0.17	65	0.10
Rubinstein 1966	37	0.55	31	0.00	53	0.07	45	0.07	34	0.27	50	0.14
Schilhawsky 1960	19	0.62	34	0.00	33	0.10	26	0.42	4	0.58	20	0.49
Shebanova 2002	4	0.65	6	0.04	4	0.12	1	0.60	7	0.59	2	0.59
Smith 1975	16	0.62	69	0.00	31	0.07	28	0.41	4	0.54	24	0.47
Sokolov 2002	26	0.60	9	0.03	38	0.11	39	0.32	7	0.47	36	0.39
Sztompka 1959	20	0.61	11	0.02	14	0.07	18	0.48	12	0.47	25	0.47
Tomsic 1995	48	0.52	62	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	16	0.36	53	0.13
Uninsky 1932	53	0.51	10	0.02	20	0.06	40	0.31	15	0.47	38	0.38
Uninsky 1971	25	0.60	7	0.04	9	0.08	15	0.50	8	0.52	16	0.51
Wasowski 1980	62	0.48	75	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	40	0.15	66	0.09
Zak 1937	24	0.60	56	0.00	35	0.08	27	0.41	15	0.50	29	0.45
Zak 1951	27	0.60	39	0.00	28	0.08	25	0.42	16	0.46	31	0.44
Random 1	90	-0.06	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	83	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2	89	0.00	88	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	13	0.39	69	0.09
Random 3	88	0.00	89	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	15	0.37	70	0.09

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).