Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   33  0.6259  0.0032  0.1030  0.2253  0.0637  0.11
Ax 1995   36  0.6153  0.0027  0.0827  0.2433  0.1228  0.17
Bacha 1998   45  0.5923  0.0043  0.0547  0.0531  0.1642  0.09
Barbosa 1983   30  0.6331  0.0033  0.1032  0.1929  0.2916  0.23
BenOr 1989   3  0.702  0.104  0.258  0.5612  0.602  0.58
Biret 1990   7  0.6848  0.0010  0.2010  0.5533  0.248  0.36
Brailowsky 1960   16  0.6515  0.0014  0.0921  0.3818  0.535  0.45
Chiu 1999   58  0.5457  0.0052  0.0452  0.0444  0.0657  0.05
Clidat 1994   37  0.6156  0.0034  0.1136  0.1132  0.2330  0.16
Cohen 1997   63  0.4940  0.0064  0.0641  0.0624  0.2436  0.12
Cortot 1951   54  0.5561  0.0063  0.0455  0.0420  0.2143  0.09
Csalog 1996   38  0.6162  0.0041  0.0544  0.0551  0.0558  0.05
Czerny 1989   51  0.5737  0.0040  0.0739  0.0739  0.0651  0.06
Ezaki 2006   40  0.6018  0.0049  0.0542  0.0555  0.0555  0.05
Falvay 1989   12  0.668  0.017  0.193  0.6931  0.1511  0.32
Fiorentino 1962   35  0.6232  0.0038  0.0738  0.0758  0.0652  0.06
Fliere 1977   47  0.5949  0.0042  0.0450  0.0455  0.0563  0.04
Fou 1978   31  0.6338  0.0028  0.1128  0.2349  0.0734  0.13
Francois 1956   59  0.5325  0.0053  0.0461  0.0436  0.0854  0.06
Goldenweiser 1946   62  0.5065  0.0057  0.0456  0.0429  0.1744  0.08
Gornostaeva 1994   52  0.5624  0.0051  0.0458  0.0446  0.0662  0.05
Groot 1988   19  0.6519  0.0020  0.0816  0.4034  0.0923  0.19
Hatto 1993   27  0.6355  0.0026  0.0924  0.3553  0.0633  0.14
Hatto 1997   23  0.6439  0.0023  0.0915  0.4145  0.0726  0.17
Horszowski 1983   53  0.5654  0.0046  0.0451  0.0423  0.2438  0.10
Indjic 2001   24  0.6444  0.0024  0.1119  0.3953  0.0631  0.15
Katin 1996   14  0.6613  0.0017  0.0812  0.4330  0.2610  0.33
Kiepura 1999   41  0.6060  0.0055  0.0363  0.0339  0.0756  0.05
Korecka 1992   43  0.6063  0.0056  0.0457  0.0435  0.0950  0.06
Kushner 1990   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Lilamand 2001   55  0.5529  0.0058  0.0545  0.0532  0.1939  0.10
Luisada 1990   26  0.6426  0.0021  0.0918  0.4030  0.309  0.35
Luisada 2008   32  0.6230  0.0030  0.0833  0.1829  0.2917  0.23
Lushtak 2004   18  0.659  0.0122  0.1117  0.4034  0.1020  0.20
Malcuzynski 1951   21  0.6411  0.0136  0.1434  0.1460  0.0546  0.08
Malcuzynski 1961   4  0.6928  0.006  0.186  0.6035  0.0915  0.23
Magaloff 1977   48  0.5942  0.0045  0.0453  0.0447  0.0760  0.05
Magin 1975   15  0.6522  0.0035  0.1335  0.1348  0.0641  0.09
Meguri 1997   57  0.5458  0.0054  0.0454  0.0461  0.0465  0.04
Milkina 1970   5  0.693  0.032  0.384  0.6611  0.591  0.62
Mohovich 1999   39  0.614  0.0311  0.1025  0.2935  0.1322  0.19
Nezu 2005   10  0.667  0.0215  0.0822  0.3840  0.0827  0.17
Ohlsson 1999   28  0.6312  0.0131  0.0929  0.2331  0.1621  0.19
Olejniczak 1990   17  0.6517  0.0016  0.1023  0.3636  0.0829  0.17
Osinska 1989   2  0.7116  0.003  0.242  0.7329  0.293  0.46
Perlemuter 1992   56  0.5450  0.0061  0.0460  0.0433  0.0948  0.06
Poblocka 1999   8  0.6827  0.0012  0.0713  0.4345  0.0725  0.17
Rangell 2001   46  0.5934  0.0048  0.0546  0.0529  0.1940  0.10
Richter 1960   60  0.5246  0.0059  0.0543  0.0554  0.0559  0.05
Richter 1961   64  0.4551  0.0062  0.0365  0.0344  0.0664  0.04
Rosen 1989   49  0.5852  0.0044  0.0548  0.0552  0.0561  0.05
Rubinstein 1939   25  0.6410  0.0118  0.0714  0.4134  0.1118  0.21
Rubinstein 1952   9  0.6714  0.008  0.227  0.5924  0.346  0.45
Rubinstein 1966   20  0.6436  0.0013  0.0811  0.4736  0.0724  0.18
Rudanovskaya 2007   61  0.5241  0.0060  0.0362  0.0321  0.2045  0.08
Shebanova 2002   29  0.6333  0.0019  0.0820  0.3927  0.2512  0.31
Smith 1975   50  0.5843  0.0047  0.0459  0.0435  0.0949  0.06
Sztompka 1959   44  0.5921  0.0050  0.0549  0.0537  0.0947  0.07
Tanyel 1992   22  0.6420  0.0025  0.0826  0.2727  0.2314  0.25
Tsujii 2005   6  0.6945  0.005  0.165  0.6545  0.0719  0.21
Uninsky 1959   11  0.6635  0.009  0.219  0.5624  0.374  0.46
Vardi 1988   34  0.625  0.0237  0.0937  0.0930  0.2232  0.14
Wasowski 1980   13  0.666  0.0229  0.0831  0.2119  0.4013  0.29
Zimerman 1975   42  0.6047  0.0039  0.0740  0.0747  0.0653  0.06
Average   1  0.761  0.691  0.681  0.8933  0.187  0.40
Random 1   67  -0.0266  0.0066  0.0266  0.0234  0.0566  0.03
Random 2   66  -0.0167  0.0067  0.0167  0.0142  0.0567  0.02
Random 3   65  0.0564  0.0065  0.0364  0.031  0.5735  0.13

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).