Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   56  0.4740  0.0029  0.0531  0.1359  0.0533  0.08
Ax 1995   26  0.5822  0.0021  0.1018  0.3453  0.0616  0.14
Bacha 1998   61  0.4464  0.0060  0.0460  0.0461  0.0461  0.04
Barbosa 1983   58  0.4632  0.0038  0.0741  0.0758  0.0538  0.06
BenOr 1989   41  0.5354  0.0031  0.0726  0.2055  0.0527  0.10
Biret 1990   25  0.5816  0.0115  0.0912  0.4064  0.0417  0.13
Brailowsky 1960   51  0.4926  0.0048  0.0650  0.0660  0.0544  0.05
Chiu 1999   57  0.4639  0.0059  0.0464  0.0447  0.0646  0.05
Clidat 1994   55  0.4844  0.0058  0.0461  0.0448  0.0652  0.05
Cohen 1997   64  0.3262  0.0064  0.0553  0.0551  0.0553  0.05
Cortot 1951   59  0.4645  0.0054  0.0646  0.0638  0.0642  0.06
Csalog 1996   6  0.6231  0.007  0.185  0.5656  0.058  0.17
Czerny 1989   5  0.646  0.049  0.127  0.5453  0.059  0.16
Ezaki 2006   35  0.5558  0.0045  0.0555  0.0549  0.0643  0.05
Falvay 1989   8  0.628  0.0412  0.0914  0.3761  0.0418  0.12
Fiorentino 1962   47  0.5142  0.0052  0.0554  0.0559  0.0654  0.05
Fliere 1977   44  0.5235  0.0044  0.0647  0.0664  0.0359  0.04
Fou 1978   37  0.5423  0.0022  0.1017  0.3461  0.0419  0.12
Francois 1956   53  0.4914  0.0143  0.0643  0.0661  0.0456  0.05
Goldenweiser 1946   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Gornostaeva 1994   62  0.4338  0.0057  0.0651  0.0662  0.0455  0.05
Groot 1988   4  0.6413  0.013  0.182  0.7158  0.056  0.19
Hatto 1993   16  0.5963  0.0028  0.0632  0.1360  0.0534  0.08
Hatto 1997   15  0.6052  0.0027  0.0923  0.2364  0.0426  0.10
Horszowski 1983   30  0.5725  0.0033  0.0633  0.1333  0.1023  0.11
Indjic 2001   12  0.6010  0.0326  0.0625  0.2156  0.0625  0.11
Katin 1996   45  0.5148  0.0051  0.0552  0.0548  0.0648  0.05
Kiepura 1999   60  0.4533  0.0056  0.0557  0.0560  0.0457  0.04
Korecka 1992   31  0.5655  0.0041  0.0739  0.0758  0.0447  0.05
Kushner 1990   48  0.5061  0.0032  0.0729  0.1756  0.0432  0.08
Lilamand 2001   23  0.5834  0.0020  0.1122  0.2719  0.352  0.31
Luisada 1990   29  0.5743  0.0013  0.0915  0.3759  0.0515  0.14
Luisada 2008   39  0.5449  0.0039  0.0837  0.0856  0.0439  0.06
Lushtak 2004   33  0.5660  0.0023  0.0920  0.3063  0.0424  0.11
Malcuzynski 1951   19  0.592  0.172  0.224  0.5744  0.067  0.18
Malcuzynski 1961   32  0.564  0.064  0.168  0.5160  0.0511  0.16
Magaloff 1977   43  0.5221  0.0024  0.0930  0.1763  0.0528  0.09
Magin 1975   10  0.615  0.0410  0.1111  0.4258  0.0514  0.14
Meguri 1997   11  0.613  0.0811  0.1021  0.2729  0.163  0.21
Milkina 1970   34  0.5653  0.0034  0.0836  0.0853  0.0636  0.07
Mohovich 1999   22  0.5819  0.0018  0.0924  0.2264  0.0430  0.09
Nezu 2005   40  0.5347  0.0042  0.0935  0.0964  0.0440  0.06
Ohlsson 1999   27  0.5824  0.0037  0.0740  0.0763  0.0449  0.05
Olejniczak 1990   14  0.6037  0.0017  0.1013  0.3743  0.0712  0.16
Osinska 1989   7  0.6246  0.0016  0.1110  0.4758  0.0513  0.15
Perlemuter 1992   28  0.5736  0.0049  0.0462  0.0449  0.0560  0.04
Poblocka 1999   24  0.5850  0.0035  0.1034  0.1059  0.0535  0.07
Rangell 2001   36  0.5529  0.0047  0.0556  0.0558  0.0465  0.04
Richter 1960   50  0.4928  0.0062  0.0742  0.0763  0.0450  0.05
Richter 1961   63  0.4220  0.0063  0.0648  0.0647  0.0545  0.05
Rosen 1989   21  0.5918  0.0119  0.0916  0.3557  0.0421  0.12
Rubinstein 1939   42  0.5341  0.0040  0.0738  0.0758  0.0537  0.06
Rubinstein 1952   38  0.5427  0.0030  0.0627  0.1963  0.0431  0.09
Rubinstein 1966   49  0.5051  0.0050  0.0459  0.0464  0.0463  0.04
Rudanovskaya 2007   13  0.609  0.0346  0.0558  0.0558  0.0464  0.04
Shebanova 2002   20  0.5915  0.0136  0.0644  0.0658  0.0551  0.05
Smith 1975   18  0.597  0.048  0.159  0.4941  0.075  0.19
Sztompka 1959   2  0.6512  0.025  0.166  0.5622  0.391  0.47
Tanyel 1992   17  0.5911  0.0214  0.0919  0.3053  0.0520  0.12
Tsujii 2005   9  0.6157  0.0025  0.0728  0.1860  0.0529  0.09
Uninsky 1959   3  0.6517  0.016  0.163  0.6360  0.0410  0.16
Vardi 1988   46  0.5130  0.0053  0.0649  0.0664  0.0362  0.04
Wasowski 1980   52  0.4966  0.0055  0.0463  0.0464  0.0458  0.04
Zimerman 1975   54  0.4867  0.0061  0.0645  0.0654  0.0641  0.06
Average   1  0.671  0.341  0.341  0.7761  0.054  0.20
Random 1   67  -0.0656  0.0066  0.0266  0.0256  0.0366  0.02
Random 2   66  -0.0565  0.0067  0.0167  0.0167  0.0167  0.01
Random 3   65  0.0159  0.0065  0.0465  0.0411  0.3822  0.12

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).