Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   63  0.2718  0.0041  0.0749  0.0761  0.0457  0.05
Ax 1995   21  0.517  0.018  0.167  0.6153  0.0713  0.21
Bacha 1998   40  0.4624  0.0039  0.1333  0.1338  0.0834  0.10
Barbosa 1983   36  0.473  0.117  0.1522  0.4125  0.286  0.34
BenOr 1989   25  0.5027  0.0016  0.0914  0.4950  0.0523  0.16
Biret 1990   29  0.4939  0.0018  0.0928  0.3752  0.0629  0.15
Brailowsky 1960   1  0.612  0.192  0.492  0.753  0.701  0.72
Chiu 1999   47  0.4242  0.0046  0.0650  0.0660  0.0451  0.05
Clidat 1994   50  0.4153  0.0042  0.0842  0.0860  0.0445  0.06
Cohen 1997   62  0.2866  0.0062  0.0463  0.0453  0.0463  0.04
Cortot 1951   49  0.4237  0.0053  0.0460  0.0460  0.0464  0.04
Csalog 1996   13  0.548  0.0123  0.0716  0.4737  0.0620  0.17
Czerny 1989   23  0.5112  0.0024  0.0725  0.3952  0.0626  0.15
Ezaki 2006   31  0.4923  0.0033  0.0939  0.0952  0.0536  0.07
Falvay 1989   3  0.604  0.074  0.334  0.7238  0.089  0.24
Fiorentino 1962   18  0.5238  0.0027  0.0923  0.4046  0.0721  0.17
Fliere 1977   37  0.4643  0.0038  0.1334  0.1360  0.0437  0.07
Fou 1978   5  0.5713  0.0011  0.1412  0.5244  0.0716  0.19
Francois 1956   39  0.4636  0.0032  0.1432  0.2643  0.0731  0.13
Goldenweiser 1946   26  0.5014  0.0015  0.0926  0.3819  0.247  0.30
Gornostaeva 1994   52  0.3832  0.0050  0.0748  0.0756  0.0549  0.06
Groot 1988   27  0.5057  0.0031  0.1430  0.3458  0.0432  0.12
Hatto 1993   42  0.4560  0.0044  0.0651  0.0660  0.0559  0.05
Hatto 1997   43  0.4551  0.0045  0.0653  0.0648  0.0642  0.06
Horszowski 1983   59  0.3364  0.0057  0.0554  0.0559  0.0460  0.04
Indjic 2001   41  0.4565  0.0047  0.0747  0.0762  0.0456  0.05
Katin 1996   15  0.5350  0.0029  0.1324  0.4045  0.0627  0.15
Kiepura 1999   33  0.4829  0.0017  0.0921  0.4229  0.275  0.34
Korecka 1992   12  0.5421  0.0012  0.159  0.5710  0.614  0.59
Kushner 1990   10  0.5411  0.0028  0.1019  0.4442  0.0718  0.18
Lilamand 2001   54  0.3726  0.0051  0.0938  0.0944  0.0538  0.07
Luisada 1990   38  0.4652  0.0037  0.1036  0.1054  0.0539  0.07
Luisada 2008   48  0.4219  0.0040  0.0744  0.0753  0.0543  0.06
Lushtak 2004   34  0.4756  0.0036  0.0840  0.0851  0.0546  0.06
Malcuzynski 1951   19  0.5215  0.0026  0.0920  0.4456  0.0624  0.16
Malcuzynski 1961   7  0.5628  0.009  0.188  0.6039  0.0715  0.20
Magaloff 1977   53  0.3725  0.0056  0.0652  0.0640  0.0644  0.06
Magin 1975   2  0.601  0.441  0.433  0.727  0.612  0.66
Meguri 1997   58  0.3559  0.0061  0.0462  0.0451  0.0562  0.04
Milkina 1970   6  0.566  0.046  0.226  0.6334  0.118  0.26
Mohovich 1999   24  0.5130  0.0014  0.0911  0.5350  0.0522  0.16
Nezu 2005   28  0.4940  0.0034  0.0745  0.0751  0.0740  0.07
Ohlsson 1999   17  0.5234  0.0019  0.0915  0.4835  0.0912  0.21
Olejniczak 1990   16  0.5347  0.0030  0.1329  0.3747  0.0630  0.15
Osinska 1989   8  0.5617  0.0021  0.0818  0.4455  0.0525  0.15
Perlemuter 1992   51  0.3954  0.0054  0.0559  0.0538  0.0650  0.05
Poblocka 1999   4  0.605  0.063  0.291  0.7817  0.493  0.62
Rangell 2001   57  0.3646  0.0060  0.0556  0.0555  0.0558  0.05
Richter 1960   61  0.2945  0.0063  0.0558  0.0555  0.0552  0.05
Richter 1961   60  0.3344  0.0058  0.0461  0.0463  0.0461  0.04
Rosen 1989   45  0.4455  0.0043  0.0841  0.0858  0.0448  0.06
Rubinstein 1939   14  0.5320  0.0013  0.1310  0.5535  0.1010  0.23
Rubinstein 1952   20  0.5235  0.0010  0.1413  0.5241  0.0717  0.19
Rubinstein 1966   9  0.559  0.015  0.185  0.6638  0.0811  0.23
Rudanovskaya 2007   46  0.4433  0.0052  0.0746  0.0754  0.0454  0.05
Shebanova 2002   56  0.3663  0.0059  0.0555  0.0550  0.0553  0.05
Smith 1975   22  0.5149  0.0020  0.0927  0.3840  0.0819  0.17
Sztompka 1959   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Tanyel 1992   55  0.3741  0.0055  0.0557  0.0550  0.0655  0.05
Tsujii 2005   35  0.4748  0.0048  0.0937  0.0963  0.0447  0.06
Uninsky 1959   11  0.5410  0.0122  0.0817  0.4533  0.0914  0.20
Vardi 1988   30  0.4922  0.0035  0.1035  0.1045  0.0735  0.08
Wasowski 1980   44  0.4431  0.0049  0.0743  0.0754  0.0641  0.06
Zimerman 1975   32  0.4816  0.0025  0.0731  0.2940  0.0828  0.15
Random 1   64  0.0361  0.0064  0.0364  0.036  0.4133  0.11
Random 2   65  0.0162  0.0066  0.0166  0.0153  0.0466  0.02
Random 3   66  -0.0158  0.0065  0.0265  0.0236  0.0565  0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).