Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   61  0.4556  0.0031  0.0730  0.1711  0.5829  0.31
Ax 1995   36  0.5518  0.0029  0.0928  0.2419  0.4130  0.31
Bacha 1998   34  0.5632  0.0025  0.1125  0.311  0.7822  0.49
Barbosa 1983   51  0.5257  0.0032  0.0832  0.168  0.6127  0.31
BenOr 1989   14  0.6425  0.0018  0.1617  0.5113  0.6018  0.55
Biret 1990   32  0.5727  0.0038  0.0649  0.0626  0.3047  0.13
Brailowsky 1960   55  0.4835  0.0053  0.0561  0.0547  0.0661  0.05
Chiu 1999   44  0.5360  0.0043  0.0645  0.069  0.6234  0.19
Clidat 1994   47  0.5362  0.0042  0.0644  0.0616  0.3743  0.15
Cohen 1997   63  0.3046  0.0063  0.0653  0.0639  0.0660  0.06
Cortot 1951   52  0.5163  0.0059  0.0647  0.064  0.5339  0.18
Csalog 1996   30  0.5847  0.0039  0.0643  0.0628  0.2151  0.11
Czerny 1989   22  0.6115  0.0021  0.1023  0.4310  0.6020  0.51
Ezaki 2006   29  0.5848  0.0034  0.1033  0.1029  0.2642  0.16
Falvay 1989   3  0.704  0.006  0.184  0.7713  0.626  0.69
Fiorentino 1962   11  0.655  0.0010  0.277  0.688  0.649  0.66
Fliere 1977   23  0.6033  0.0011  0.1815  0.533  0.7114  0.61
Fou 1978   12  0.6421  0.004  0.169  0.645  0.688  0.66
Francois 1956   56  0.4754  0.0058  0.0462  0.0457  0.0564  0.04
Goldenweiser 1946   53  0.4928  0.0055  0.0646  0.0626  0.1752  0.10
Gornostaeva 1994   58  0.4629  0.0054  0.0463  0.0421  0.4246  0.13
Groot 1988   25  0.5930  0.0024  0.1324  0.4217  0.4324  0.42
Hatto 1993   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Hatto 1997   2  0.952  0.072  0.962  1.002  0.992  0.99
Horszowski 1983   57  0.4738  0.0051  0.0650  0.067  0.5736  0.18
Indjic 2001   1  0.961  0.931  0.911  1.001  1.001  1.00
Katin 1996   16  0.6334  0.0022  0.1222  0.4326  0.3725  0.40
Kiepura 1999   45  0.5340  0.0041  0.0739  0.0725  0.4435  0.18
Korecka 1992   37  0.5542  0.0052  0.0558  0.0523  0.4244  0.14
Kushner 1990   40  0.5458  0.0047  0.0738  0.0731  0.1750  0.11
Lilamand 2001   59  0.4619  0.0061  0.0642  0.0638  0.0657  0.06
Luisada 1990   6  0.679  0.008  0.195  0.762  0.803  0.78
Luisada 2008   17  0.628  0.0019  0.1019  0.456  0.7116  0.57
Lushtak 2004   8  0.6626  0.009  0.248  0.654  0.707  0.67
Malcuzynski 1951   19  0.6149  0.0017  0.1321  0.437  0.6719  0.54
Malcuzynski 1961   9  0.6517  0.003  0.216  0.723  0.704  0.71
Magaloff 1977   54  0.4923  0.0057  0.0559  0.0531  0.1653  0.09
Magin 1975   28  0.5850  0.0028  0.0831  0.1642  0.0849  0.11
Meguri 1997   48  0.5324  0.0050  0.0555  0.0520  0.3945  0.14
Milkina 1970   18  0.6159  0.0026  0.1026  0.3036  0.1040  0.17
Mohovich 1999   27  0.596  0.0036  0.0652  0.0637  0.0759  0.06
Nezu 2005   5  0.683  0.005  0.1512  0.598  0.6513  0.62
Ohlsson 1999   26  0.5920  0.0027  0.0827  0.2418  0.4726  0.34
Olejniczak 1990   13  0.6416  0.0023  0.1318  0.488  0.6717  0.57
Osinska 1989   10  0.6543  0.0015  0.1210  0.6223  0.4021  0.50
Perlemuter 1992   62  0.4351  0.0062  0.0557  0.0535  0.0756  0.06
Poblocka 1999   7  0.6622  0.0012  0.1711  0.628  0.6810  0.65
Rangell 2001   41  0.5413  0.0048  0.0934  0.0914  0.6231  0.24
Richter 1960   43  0.5436  0.0049  0.0837  0.0812  0.5332  0.21
Richter 1961   46  0.5331  0.0035  0.0554  0.054  0.6738  0.18
Rosen 1989   35  0.5664  0.0045  0.0648  0.0639  0.0758  0.06
Rubinstein 1939   21  0.6112  0.0013  0.1614  0.575  0.7311  0.65
Rubinstein 1952   39  0.5552  0.0037  0.0740  0.0730  0.2648  0.13
Rubinstein 1966   31  0.5741  0.0033  0.0935  0.0939  0.0754  0.08
Rudanovskaya 2007   49  0.5244  0.0056  0.0556  0.0532  0.1355  0.08
Shebanova 2002   42  0.5437  0.0046  0.0651  0.0621  0.4641  0.17
Smith 1975   33  0.5745  0.0040  0.0936  0.0922  0.4333  0.20
Sztompka 1959   60  0.4555  0.0060  0.0560  0.0551  0.0662  0.05
Tanyel 1992   38  0.5553  0.0030  0.0729  0.1919  0.5228  0.31
Tsujii 2005   4  0.6910  0.007  0.223  0.787  0.655  0.71
Uninsky 1959   24  0.6011  0.0020  0.1120  0.4418  0.4223  0.43
Vardi 1988   15  0.6314  0.0014  0.1616  0.535  0.7312  0.62
Wasowski 1980   50  0.5239  0.0044  0.0741  0.0715  0.4537  0.18
Zimerman 1975   20  0.617  0.0016  0.1313  0.578  0.6415  0.60
Random 1   65  0.0065  0.0065  0.0265  0.0226  0.1463  0.05
Random 2   64  0.0161  0.0064  0.0264  0.0235  0.0665  0.03
Random 3   66  -0.0266  0.0066  0.0166  0.0161  0.0366  0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).