Ferenczy 1958

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		14	0.63	12	0.01	14	0.09	28	0.20	63	0.04	31	0.09
Ashkenazy 1981		47	0.58	62	0.00	49	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.04	63	0.04
Beliavsky 2004		55	0.54	20	0.01	59	0.05	55	0.05	40	0.06	48	0.05
BenOr 1989		2	0.70	4	0.02	2	0.33	3	0.69	47	0.07	5	0.22
Biret 1990		43	0.58	50	0.00	44	0.06	45	0.06	60	0.05	57	0.05
Blet 2003		10	0.64	32	0.00	11	0.07	9	0.53	45	0.06	7	0.18
Block 1995		18	0.62	28	0.00	35	0.06	43	0.06	51	0.05	53	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		9	0.64	10	0.01	7	0.15	7	0.55	13	0.51	2	0.53
Chiu 1999		50	0.57	6	0.01	40	0.08	35	0.08	60	0.04	35	0.06
Clidat 1994		34	0.60	45	0.00	39	0.10	33	0.10	59	0.04	39	0.06
Cohen 1997		59	0.52	18	0.01	63	0.06	50	0.06	62	0.04	56	0.05
Coop 1987		3	0.66	3	0.04	3	0.38	2	0.70	46	0.07	4	0.22
Cortot 1951		56	0.54	58	0.00	61	0.04	61	0.04	47	0.06	58	0.05
Czerny 1949		32	0.60	24	0.00	25	0.11	24	0.31	41	0.08	16	0.16
Czerny 1949b		42	0.58	52	0.00	42	0.06	48	0.06	61	0.05	46	0.05
Ezaki 2006		8	0.64	23	0.00	8	0.09	5	0.58	47	0.08	3	0.22
Falvay 1989		24	0.61	22	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.17	62	0.04	32	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fiorentino 1962		28	0.61	48	0.00	18	0.08	15	0.47	50	0.06	12	0.17
Fliere 1977		15	0.63	9	0.01	13	0.07	18	0.42	58	0.04	19	0.13
Fou 1978		39	0.59	55	0.00	24	0.10	20	0.35	57	0.05	22	0.13
Francois 1956		57	0.53	25	0.00	58	0.05	51	0.05	33	0.07	41	0.06
Hatto 1997		46	0.58	41	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	43	0.06	51	0.05
Horowitz 1971		30	0.60	11	0.01	27	0.11	25	0.29	37	0.06	25	0.13
Horowitz 1985		61	0.49	15	0.01	54	0.04	58	0.04	43	0.06	43	0.05
Indjic 2001		37	0.59	59	0.00	53	0.06	49	0.06	59	0.05	55	0.05
Kapell 1951		33	0.60	56	0.00	30	0.07	29	0.19	52	0.06	27	0.11
Kiepura 1999		35	0.59	34	0.00	52	0.06	47	0.06	58	0.04	42	0.05
Kilenyi 1937		25	0.61	46	0.00	16	0.07	16	0.46	57	0.05	18	0.15
Kissin 1993		20	0.62	42	0.00	28	0.10	26	0.27	50	0.06	23	0.13
Kitain 1937		63	0.37	49	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	50	0.04	64	0.04
Kushner 1990		41	0.58	14	0.01	20	0.09	27	0.25	48	0.05	28	0.11
Levy 1951		29	0.60	17	0.01	29	0.08	32	0.15	40	0.06	30	0.09
Luisada 1990		60	0.52	66	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	64	0.04	60	0.04
Lushtak 2004		23	0.62	27	0.00	34	0.06	42	0.06	60	0.04	52	0.05
Lympany 1968		22	0.62	57	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.07	41	0.06	34	0.06
Magaloff 1977		36	0.59	39	0.00	45	0.07	39	0.07	58	0.05	38	0.06
Magaloff 1977b		45	0.58	47	0.00	51	0.05	53	0.05	59	0.04	62	0.04
Magin 1975		38	0.59	31	0.00	47	0.07	37	0.07	57	0.05	36	0.06
Milkina 1970		13	0.64	54	0.00	33	0.06	46	0.06	62	0.04	47	0.05
Mohovich 1999		16	0.63	38	0.00	26	0.11	23	0.31	51	0.05	26	0.12
Nadelmann 1956		40	0.59	44	0.00	36	0.06	44	0.06	59	0.04	50	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		26	0.61	8	0.01	32	0.10	30	0.19	54	0.05	29	0.10
Olejniczac 1990		27	0.61	35	0.00	17	0.07	14	0.48	52	0.06	11	0.17
Olejniczak 1991		21	0.62	5	0.02	19	0.09	13	0.50	55	0.05	14	0.16
Osinska 1989		4	0.65	43	0.00	12	0.09	8	0.54	63	0.03	20	0.13
Paderewski 1912		48	0.58	13	0.01	9	0.11	21	0.34	52	0.05	24	0.13
Perahia 1994		49	0.57	26	0.00	48	0.05	52	0.05	49	0.05	54	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		53	0.55	33	0.00	41	0.07	36	0.07	60	0.04	49	0.05
Poblocka 1999		6	0.65	19	0.01	6	0.16	6	0.56	46	0.06	6	0.18
Rangell 2001		54	0.55	53	0.00	56	0.07	40	0.07	58	0.05	40	0.06
Risler 1920		62	0.48	63	0.00	57	0.05	56	0.05	54	0.05	44	0.05
Rosen 1989		7	0.65	2	0.04	4	0.24	4	0.59	12	0.54	1	0.56
Rubinstein 1939		52	0.56	60	0.00	46	0.06	41	0.06	56	0.04	45	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		17	0.62	16	0.01	22	0.10	19	0.42	34	0.07	13	0.17
Rubinstein 1966		11	0.64	37	0.00	21	0.11	12	0.50	34	0.06	9	0.17
Rummel 1943		58	0.52	40	0.00	50	0.05	57	0.05	61	0.03	61	0.04
Shebanova 2002		12	0.64	21	0.00	15	0.08	11	0.51	49	0.06	10	0.17
Smith 1975		19	0.62	30	0.00	10	0.12	17	0.43	61	0.04	21	0.13
Szpilman 1948		44	0.58	36	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.33	38	0.07	17	0.15
Uninsky 1971		51	0.56	51	0.00	43	0.05	54	0.05	55	0.04	59	0.04
Wasowski 1980		31	0.60	29	0.00	38	0.09	34	0.09	58	0.05	33	0.07
Weissenberg 1971		5	0.65	7	0.01	5	0.14	10	0.53	56	0.05	15	0.16
Average		1	0.73	1	0.71	1	0.70	1	0.85	62	0.04	8	0.18
Random 1		65	-0.02	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	21	0.19	37	0.06
Random 2		64	-0.01	61	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	58	0.02	65	0.02
Random 3		66	-0.07	65	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	63	0.02	66	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).