Coop 1987

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		50	0.66	10	0.00	43	0.06	49	0.06	19	0.36	47	0.15
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.77	53	0.00	23	0.09	24	0.42	15	0.50	25	0.46
Beliavsky 2004		43	0.69	34	0.00	44	0.06	48	0.06	14	0.35	48	0.14
BenOr 1989		16	0.79	27	0.00	16	0.13	12	0.58	12	0.54	18	0.56
Biret 1990		29	0.74	42	0.00	31	0.12	28	0.33	10	0.58	27	0.44
Blet 2003		47	0.67	37	0.00	49	0.07	45	0.07	32	0.11	51	0.09
Block 1995		15	0.79	13	0.00	18	0.13	23	0.43	3	0.63	19	0.52
Brailowsky 1960		55	0.60	46	0.00	58	0.05	59	0.05	39	0.08	54	0.06
Chiu 1999		8	0.83	8	0.01	10	0.35	11	0.58	3	0.71	11	0.64
Clidat 1994		27	0.74	28	0.00	35	0.11	35	0.11	5	0.60	35	0.26
Cohen 1997		59	0.57	21	0.00	60	0.04	62	0.04	30	0.17	53	0.08
Coop 1987		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cortot 1951		51	0.66	35	0.00	57	0.06	50	0.06	14	0.44	46	0.16
Czerny 1949		28	0.74	33	0.00	19	0.13	22	0.43	11	0.60	22	0.51
Czerny 1949b		37	0.71	51	0.00	29	0.08	32	0.20	14	0.56	31	0.33
Ezaki 2006		3	0.87	7	0.01	3	0.48	3	0.75	4	0.78	2	0.76
Falvay 1989		5	0.84	6	0.01	6	0.14	4	0.71	2	0.81	3	0.76
Ferenczy 1958		49	0.66	20	0.00	47	0.07	46	0.07	2	0.70	39	0.22
Fiorentino 1962		19	0.77	43	0.00	20	0.13	15	0.51	9	0.66	14	0.58
Fliere 1977		23	0.76	47	0.00	25	0.10	21	0.43	11	0.57	23	0.50
Fou 1978		18	0.78	45	0.00	21	0.18	20	0.48	12	0.55	21	0.51
Francois 1956		61	0.51	36	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	38	0.07	57	0.06
Hatto 1997		40	0.70	16	0.00	40	0.12	34	0.12	9	0.58	34	0.26
Horowitz 1971		56	0.58	30	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	51	0.05	62	0.05
Horowitz 1985		62	0.49	62	0.00	62	0.06	47	0.06	61	0.04	58	0.05
Indjic 2001		39	0.70	48	0.00	39	0.09	38	0.09	12	0.52	40	0.22
Kapell 1951		6	0.84	24	0.00	9	0.21	10	0.66	4	0.69	10	0.67
Kiepura 1999		41	0.70	44	0.00	45	0.07	44	0.07	16	0.52	44	0.19
Kilenyi 1937		9	0.82	49	0.00	5	0.20	8	0.68	3	0.70	8	0.69
Kissin 1993		7	0.84	26	0.00	7	0.17	7	0.69	2	0.69	7	0.69
Kitain 1937		63	0.41	50	0.00	63	0.06	51	0.06	62	0.03	64	0.04
Kushner 1990		42	0.69	22	0.00	42	0.10	36	0.10	14	0.47	38	0.22
Levy 1951		35	0.72	23	0.00	34	0.08	42	0.08	8	0.66	36	0.23
Luisada 1990		26	0.76	54	0.00	32	0.16	29	0.30	15	0.51	30	0.39
Lushtak 2004		31	0.73	15	0.00	36	0.15	33	0.15	6	0.66	33	0.31
Lympany 1968		45	0.69	57	0.00	46	0.09	37	0.09	10	0.50	41	0.21
Magaloff 1977		21	0.76	61	0.00	24	0.09	25	0.41	11	0.48	26	0.44
Magaloff 1977b		25	0.76	58	0.00	26	0.10	26	0.39	12	0.48	28	0.43
Magin 1975		14	0.80	52	0.00	13	0.23	14	0.52	17	0.62	15	0.57
Milkina 1970		44	0.69	40	0.00	48	0.05	58	0.05	41	0.07	56	0.06
Mohovich 1999		36	0.71	32	0.00	33	0.09	41	0.09	21	0.50	42	0.21
Nadelmann 1956		53	0.63	59	0.00	50	0.05	57	0.05	54	0.05	59	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		13	0.80	3	0.02	14	0.15	18	0.48	2	0.77	12	0.61
Olejniczac 1990		17	0.78	60	0.00	15	0.13	13	0.54	9	0.67	13	0.60
Olejniczak 1991		11	0.81	14	0.00	8	0.18	9	0.68	6	0.73	6	0.70
Osinska 1989		10	0.81	18	0.00	11	0.24	6	0.70	5	0.65	9	0.67
Paderewski 1912		46	0.67	56	0.00	41	0.08	43	0.08	14	0.42	45	0.18
Perahia 1994		60	0.54	11	0.00	53	0.06	54	0.06	30	0.14	52	0.09
Perlemuter 1986		54	0.62	41	0.00	52	0.06	55	0.06	29	0.20	50	0.11
Poblocka 1999		4	0.85	5	0.01	4	0.36	5	0.71	3	0.74	5	0.72
Rangell 2001		12	0.81	38	0.00	12	0.19	19	0.48	10	0.56	20	0.52
Risler 1920		34	0.73	29	0.00	28	0.11	27	0.35	3	0.68	24	0.49
Rosen 1989		48	0.67	9	0.00	54	0.05	56	0.05	18	0.41	49	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		57	0.58	19	0.00	55	0.06	53	0.06	38	0.07	55	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		38	0.71	39	0.00	38	0.09	39	0.09	18	0.44	43	0.20
Rubinstein 1966		52	0.65	31	0.00	51	0.06	52	0.06	62	0.04	60	0.05
Rummel 1943		58	0.58	64	0.00	56	0.04	63	0.04	38	0.06	61	0.05
Shebanova 2002		24	0.76	17	0.00	22	0.13	17	0.49	5	0.67	16	0.57
Smith 1975		22	0.76	12	0.00	17	0.14	16	0.49	4	0.63	17	0.56
Szpilman 1948		32	0.73	55	0.00	30	0.09	30	0.27	8	0.62	29	0.41
Uninsky 1971		33	0.73	25	0.00	27	0.10	31	0.23	13	0.48	32	0.33
Wasowski 1980		30	0.74	4	0.01	37	0.09	40	0.09	9	0.52	37	0.22
Weissenberg 1971		2	0.87	2	0.21	2	0.63	2	0.75	2	0.78	4	0.76
Average		1	0.89	1	0.66	1	0.65	1	0.91	4	0.66	1	0.77
Random 1		65	-0.03	63	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	38	0.05	65	0.03
Random 2		64	0.02	65	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	37	0.05	63	0.04
Random 3		66	-0.05	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	56	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).