Ashkenazy 1981

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		35	0.72	3	0.01	36	0.09	33	0.09	5	0.61	33	0.23
Ashkenazy 1981		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Beliavsky 2004		51	0.66	22	0.00	51	0.07	45	0.07	31	0.15	52	0.10
BenOr 1989		6	0.78	41	0.00	4	0.12	10	0.56	19	0.39	19	0.47
Biret 1990		14	0.77	5	0.01	13	0.14	9	0.57	5	0.68	7	0.62
Blet 2003		38	0.71	6	0.01	20	0.10	32	0.18	13	0.45	32	0.28
Block 1995		31	0.73	55	0.00	37	0.09	34	0.09	21	0.43	36	0.20
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.62	44	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	38	0.09	60	0.06
Chiu 1999		19	0.75	10	0.00	17	0.14	19	0.46	20	0.49	18	0.47
Clidat 1994		43	0.70	34	0.00	43	0.07	48	0.07	30	0.09	57	0.08
Cohen 1997		57	0.61	40	0.00	59	0.05	58	0.05	8	0.53	44	0.16
Coop 1987		16	0.77	39	0.00	14	0.11	15	0.50	24	0.42	21	0.46
Cortot 1951		50	0.66	53	0.00	55	0.06	56	0.06	13	0.44	45	0.16
Czerny 1949		36	0.72	61	0.00	35	0.09	36	0.09	27	0.32	40	0.17
Czerny 1949b		25	0.75	50	0.00	16	0.12	17	0.47	7	0.68	11	0.57
Ezaki 2006		4	0.79	19	0.00	10	0.16	11	0.55	17	0.55	13	0.55
Falvay 1989		21	0.75	13	0.00	29	0.09	29	0.25	23	0.42	30	0.32
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.58	60	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	59	0.04	64	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		32	0.72	46	0.00	34	0.08	38	0.08	34	0.12	54	0.10
Fliere 1977		8	0.78	15	0.00	12	0.16	8	0.60	8	0.61	8	0.60
Fou 1978		5	0.79	7	0.01	7	0.18	3	0.68	4	0.68	3	0.68
Francois 1956		61	0.57	23	0.00	62	0.05	59	0.05	23	0.29	50	0.12
Hatto 1997		24	0.75	24	0.00	26	0.13	23	0.43	3	0.80	9	0.59
Horowitz 1971		54	0.64	58	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	40	0.06	63	0.05
Horowitz 1985		62	0.56	57	0.00	60	0.03	64	0.03	31	0.17	59	0.07
Indjic 2001		20	0.75	14	0.00	19	0.10	14	0.52	3	0.79	6	0.64
Kapell 1951		13	0.77	49	0.00	11	0.15	13	0.53	15	0.51	14	0.52
Kiepura 1999		41	0.70	25	0.00	46	0.06	49	0.06	22	0.45	42	0.16
Kilenyi 1937		15	0.77	30	0.00	9	0.18	5	0.63	17	0.55	10	0.59
Kissin 1993		7	0.78	47	0.00	8	0.13	6	0.63	21	0.40	15	0.50
Kitain 1937		63	0.49	43	0.00	63	0.06	54	0.06	15	0.39	47	0.15
Kushner 1990		48	0.68	31	0.00	50	0.07	47	0.07	29	0.21	49	0.12
Levy 1951		45	0.68	21	0.00	38	0.08	37	0.08	20	0.40	38	0.18
Luisada 1990		10	0.77	37	0.00	23	0.11	25	0.39	8	0.55	22	0.46
Lushtak 2004		26	0.74	9	0.00	31	0.10	27	0.29	8	0.63	25	0.43
Lympany 1968		49	0.67	29	0.00	48	0.08	42	0.08	22	0.40	37	0.18
Magaloff 1977		18	0.76	48	0.00	22	0.10	20	0.45	9	0.51	17	0.48
Magaloff 1977b		17	0.76	26	0.00	18	0.11	18	0.46	7	0.53	16	0.49
Magin 1975		3	0.80	8	0.01	5	0.15	4	0.67	4	0.70	2	0.68
Milkina 1970		40	0.71	36	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	26	0.26	48	0.13
Mohovich 1999		44	0.69	35	0.00	47	0.07	44	0.07	42	0.06	62	0.06
Nadelmann 1956		42	0.70	28	0.00	40	0.08	39	0.08	24	0.27	46	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.74	54	0.00	32	0.11	31	0.21	11	0.52	29	0.33
Olejniczac 1990		30	0.74	42	0.00	27	0.11	26	0.34	28	0.35	28	0.34
Olejniczak 1991		22	0.75	51	0.00	21	0.10	24	0.42	21	0.48	24	0.45
Osinska 1989		2	0.82	2	0.02	2	0.55	2	0.79	4	0.71	1	0.75
Paderewski 1912		47	0.68	64	0.00	44	0.08	40	0.08	16	0.38	41	0.17
Perahia 1994		59	0.59	20	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	28	0.20	53	0.10
Perlemuter 1986		46	0.68	27	0.00	49	0.06	51	0.06	17	0.43	43	0.16
Poblocka 1999		9	0.78	56	0.00	15	0.17	16	0.48	20	0.44	20	0.46
Rangell 2001		12	0.77	33	0.00	3	0.17	12	0.55	6	0.58	12	0.56
Risler 1920		58	0.60	63	0.00	56	0.06	50	0.06	34	0.13	55	0.09
Rosen 1989		53	0.64	32	0.00	57	0.06	55	0.06	48	0.06	61	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		52	0.65	38	0.00	42	0.08	41	0.08	12	0.51	35	0.20
Rubinstein 1952		11	0.77	4	0.01	6	0.15	7	0.63	4	0.73	4	0.68
Rubinstein 1966		37	0.71	11	0.00	41	0.08	43	0.08	10	0.54	34	0.21
Rummel 1943		55	0.62	45	0.00	53	0.06	52	0.06	30	0.20	51	0.11
Shebanova 2002		33	0.72	18	0.00	39	0.09	35	0.09	33	0.09	56	0.09
Smith 1975		27	0.74	12	0.00	24	0.10	21	0.44	11	0.46	23	0.45
Szpilman 1948		39	0.71	52	0.00	33	0.06	53	0.06	21	0.46	39	0.17
Uninsky 1971		34	0.72	59	0.00	30	0.09	28	0.25	20	0.41	31	0.32
Wasowski 1980		23	0.75	17	0.00	28	0.10	30	0.25	7	0.59	26	0.38
Weissenberg 1971		28	0.74	16	0.00	25	0.11	22	0.43	26	0.31	27	0.37
Average		1	0.88	1	0.87	1	0.85	1	0.92	16	0.48	5	0.66
Random 1		66	-0.07	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	65	0.02	66	0.01
Random 2		64	0.02	65	0.00	64	0.03	63	0.03	36	0.06	65	0.04
Random 3		65	-0.01	62	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	16	0.33	58	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).