Rangell 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		50	0.61	49	0.00	52	0.06	51	0.06	60	0.04	58	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		12	0.77	3	0.08	10	0.25	5	0.58	11	0.55	8	0.56
Beliavsky 2004		33	0.69	28	0.00	39	0.06	50	0.06	12	0.37	38	0.15
BenOr 1989		14	0.77	30	0.00	15	0.21	11	0.54	22	0.34	19	0.43
Biret 1990		21	0.73	35	0.00	19	0.13	16	0.48	14	0.52	14	0.50
Blet 2003		44	0.66	15	0.01	45	0.05	59	0.05	29	0.15	49	0.09
Block 1995		16	0.76	24	0.00	17	0.13	19	0.43	9	0.56	15	0.49
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.55	65	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	62	0.04	62	0.04
Chiu 1999		7	0.80	10	0.02	7	0.22	12	0.53	14	0.55	9	0.54
Clidat 1994		24	0.71	25	0.00	30	0.07	30	0.16	16	0.31	30	0.22
Cohen 1997		55	0.58	19	0.01	56	0.05	56	0.05	21	0.28	43	0.12
Coop 1987		5	0.81	6	0.04	5	0.22	9	0.56	18	0.49	11	0.52
Cortot 1951		48	0.65	45	0.00	50	0.11	35	0.11	17	0.43	31	0.22
Czerny 1949		27	0.71	46	0.00	20	0.12	23	0.37	19	0.46	22	0.41
Czerny 1949b		40	0.68	50	0.00	24	0.10	28	0.24	31	0.25	28	0.24
Ezaki 2006		2	0.82	7	0.04	2	0.21	8	0.57	19	0.49	10	0.53
Falvay 1989		11	0.77	5	0.04	13	0.15	17	0.46	21	0.44	17	0.45
Ferenczy 1958		57	0.55	63	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	40	0.07	54	0.06
Fiorentino 1962		22	0.73	61	0.00	26	0.12	25	0.28	31	0.24	27	0.26
Fliere 1977		26	0.71	56	0.00	35	0.12	33	0.12	51	0.06	50	0.08
Fou 1978		13	0.77	22	0.01	14	0.16	13	0.53	16	0.50	12	0.51
Francois 1956		60	0.49	55	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	62	0.03	63	0.03
Hatto 1997		36	0.69	32	0.00	38	0.07	45	0.07	24	0.34	39	0.15
Horowitz 1971		52	0.60	33	0.00	53	0.06	54	0.06	49	0.05	60	0.05
Horowitz 1985		61	0.48	54	0.00	60	0.04	61	0.04	53	0.05	61	0.04
Indjic 2001		32	0.70	16	0.01	36	0.11	34	0.11	20	0.39	32	0.21
Kapell 1951		1	0.82	1	0.31	1	0.30	3	0.66	5	0.66	1	0.66
Kiepura 1999		42	0.67	18	0.01	49	0.07	42	0.07	32	0.16	44	0.11
Kilenyi 1937		15	0.76	47	0.00	11	0.18	14	0.51	23	0.49	13	0.50
Kissin 1993		6	0.80	2	0.20	3	0.23	2	0.71	6	0.56	2	0.63
Kitain 1937		62	0.41	52	0.00	62	0.06	55	0.06	38	0.07	56	0.06
Kushner 1990		45	0.66	41	0.00	44	0.09	37	0.09	26	0.34	37	0.17
Levy 1951		46	0.66	59	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.13	22	0.36	29	0.22
Luisada 1990		20	0.74	31	0.00	23	0.14	21	0.38	23	0.47	20	0.42
Lushtak 2004		38	0.69	34	0.00	40	0.08	39	0.08	41	0.07	52	0.07
Lympany 1968		35	0.69	27	0.00	37	0.07	49	0.07	11	0.49	33	0.19
Magaloff 1977		19	0.75	48	0.00	18	0.10	18	0.46	23	0.40	18	0.43
Magaloff 1977b		17	0.75	39	0.00	16	0.11	15	0.48	17	0.46	16	0.47
Magin 1975		8	0.79	8	0.03	9	0.21	7	0.57	23	0.57	5	0.57
Milkina 1970		37	0.69	13	0.01	46	0.07	43	0.07	31	0.14	46	0.10
Mohovich 1999		31	0.70	9	0.02	21	0.12	22	0.37	21	0.48	21	0.42
Nadelmann 1956		41	0.68	23	0.01	41	0.07	40	0.07	31	0.17	45	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.71	51	0.00	34	0.09	36	0.09	19	0.36	34	0.18
Olejniczac 1990		18	0.75	29	0.00	22	0.14	20	0.40	24	0.41	23	0.40
Olejniczak 1991		10	0.78	58	0.00	12	0.22	10	0.56	12	0.57	6	0.56
Osinska 1989		9	0.79	11	0.02	8	0.28	1	0.72	19	0.48	3	0.59
Paderewski 1912		49	0.64	40	0.00	42	0.07	44	0.07	33	0.10	51	0.08
Perahia 1994		58	0.55	14	0.01	51	0.06	53	0.06	39	0.06	55	0.06
Perlemuter 1986		54	0.59	26	0.00	54	0.07	41	0.07	44	0.06	53	0.06
Poblocka 1999		4	0.81	12	0.01	6	0.27	6	0.58	13	0.56	4	0.57
Rangell 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Risler 1920		43	0.67	53	0.00	33	0.07	48	0.07	24	0.39	35	0.17
Rosen 1989		53	0.60	44	0.00	57	0.05	58	0.05	51	0.05	59	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		59	0.54	43	0.00	55	0.06	52	0.06	54	0.04	57	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		39	0.68	36	0.00	43	0.08	38	0.08	32	0.13	48	0.10
Rubinstein 1966		47	0.66	17	0.01	47	0.07	47	0.07	24	0.21	42	0.12
Rummel 1943		51	0.60	42	0.00	48	0.07	46	0.07	18	0.31	41	0.15
Shebanova 2002		28	0.71	37	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.14	27	0.17	40	0.15
Smith 1975		25	0.71	38	0.00	27	0.13	27	0.28	34	0.10	36	0.17
Szpilman 1948		34	0.69	64	0.00	25	0.07	24	0.30	22	0.43	24	0.36
Uninsky 1971		23	0.71	21	0.01	28	0.10	26	0.28	27	0.29	26	0.28
Wasowski 1980		30	0.71	20	0.01	29	0.09	29	0.19	18	0.42	25	0.28
Weissenberg 1971		3	0.81	4	0.07	4	0.22	4	0.60	11	0.53	7	0.56
Random 1		65	-0.05	62	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	61	0.02	64	0.02
Random 2		63	0.03	57	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	27	0.27	47	0.10
Random 3		64	-0.03	60	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	51	0.03	65	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).