Paderewski 1912

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   45  0.6027  0.0046  0.0645  0.0631  0.1040  0.08
Ashkenazy 1981   10  0.6817  0.0112  0.0915  0.3840  0.0820  0.17
Beliavsky 2004   31  0.6533  0.0031  0.0731  0.1713  0.3714  0.25
BenOr 1989   20  0.6650  0.0022  0.0922  0.2856  0.0534  0.12
Biret 1990   30  0.6528  0.0032  0.0832  0.1640  0.0836  0.11
Blet 2003   56  0.5741  0.0056  0.0739  0.0749  0.0550  0.06
Block 1995   41  0.6230  0.0039  0.0649  0.0658  0.0458  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   57  0.5653  0.0057  0.0459  0.0456  0.0560  0.04
Chiu 1999   40  0.6337  0.0040  0.0553  0.0553  0.0555  0.05
Clidat 1994   37  0.6324  0.0019  0.0824  0.2654  0.0438  0.10
Cohen 1997   62  0.4660  0.0062  0.0648  0.0640  0.0652  0.06
Coop 1987   15  0.6732  0.0011  0.1013  0.4242  0.0817  0.18
Cortot 1951   51  0.5934  0.0050  0.0460  0.0425  0.3237  0.11
Czerny 1949   5  0.706  0.043  0.382  0.6117  0.492  0.55
Czerny 1949b   12  0.6816  0.019  0.098  0.4626  0.315  0.38
Ezaki 2006   32  0.6465  0.0041  0.0735  0.0749  0.0743  0.07
Falvay 1989   44  0.6144  0.0047  0.0736  0.0747  0.0744  0.07
Ferenczy 1958   53  0.5820  0.0135  0.0651  0.0621  0.3528  0.14
Fiorentino 1962   19  0.6638  0.0026  0.0725  0.2541  0.0829  0.14
Fliere 1977   17  0.6757  0.0014  0.1314  0.3942  0.0718  0.17
Fou 1978   7  0.695  0.055  0.175  0.5233  0.1015  0.23
Francois 1956   60  0.5219  0.0161  0.0554  0.0551  0.0559  0.05
Hatto 1997   52  0.5963  0.0053  0.0555  0.0547  0.0656  0.05
Horowitz 1971   35  0.6412  0.0136  0.0643  0.0617  0.4025  0.15
Horowitz 1985   58  0.5429  0.0058  0.0363  0.0333  0.1148  0.06
Indjic 2001   43  0.6161  0.0042  0.0834  0.0856  0.0551  0.06
Kapell 1951   23  0.6625  0.0023  0.0819  0.3148  0.0627  0.14
Kiepura 1999   42  0.6158  0.0048  0.0646  0.0651  0.0553  0.05
Kilenyi 1937   14  0.6747  0.0013  0.0912  0.4339  0.1016  0.21
Kissin 1993   2  0.712  0.222  0.314  0.5930  0.169  0.31
Kitain 1937   61  0.4648  0.0060  0.0556  0.0511  0.4624  0.15
Kushner 1990   55  0.5745  0.0054  0.0557  0.0556  0.0461  0.04
Levy 1951   24  0.6535  0.0028  0.0927  0.2324  0.3213  0.27
Luisada 1990   36  0.6355  0.0043  0.0738  0.0745  0.0846  0.07
Lushtak 2004   47  0.6043  0.0051  0.0458  0.0458  0.0462  0.04
Lympany 1968   46  0.6040  0.0049  0.0647  0.0647  0.0554  0.05
Magaloff 1977   4  0.7023  0.006  0.137  0.4628  0.316  0.38
Magaloff 1977b   6  0.7021  0.017  0.1110  0.4428  0.317  0.37
Magin 1975   39  0.6342  0.0045  0.0740  0.0744  0.0845  0.07
Milkina 1970   16  0.6710  0.0215  0.079  0.4418  0.434  0.43
Mohovich 1999   25  0.6522  0.0030  0.0729  0.2135  0.0733  0.12
Nadelmann 1956   50  0.5913  0.0144  0.0737  0.0749  0.0649  0.06
Ohlsson 1999   21  0.667  0.0321  0.0920  0.3128  0.2511  0.28
Olejniczac 1990   18  0.6726  0.0020  0.0921  0.2848  0.0632  0.13
Olejniczak 1991   27  0.6539  0.0027  0.0826  0.2439  0.0922  0.15
Osinska 1989   8  0.6949  0.008  0.126  0.4852  0.0619  0.17
Paderewski 1912   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Perahia 1994   59  0.5346  0.0059  0.0461  0.0449  0.0563  0.04
Perlemuter 1986   38  0.6318  0.0138  0.0644  0.0629  0.2235  0.11
Poblocka 1999   13  0.6854  0.0016  0.0817  0.3652  0.0531  0.13
Rangell 2001   33  0.6451  0.0033  0.1033  0.1044  0.0742  0.08
Risler 1920   54  0.5852  0.0055  0.0650  0.0636  0.1139  0.08
Rosen 1989   48  0.6031  0.0052  0.0552  0.0531  0.1441  0.08
Rubinstein 1939   49  0.5911  0.0137  0.0742  0.0722  0.3423  0.15
Rubinstein 1952   11  0.688  0.0218  0.0818  0.3435  0.0726  0.15
Rubinstein 1966   26  0.659  0.0224  0.0823  0.2719  0.3410  0.30
Rummel 1943   29  0.6514  0.0129  0.0830  0.212  0.598  0.35
Shebanova 2002   34  0.6436  0.0034  0.0741  0.0761  0.0457  0.05
Smith 1975   1  0.721  0.321  0.321  0.675  0.541  0.60
Szpilman 1948   3  0.703  0.094  0.173  0.6023  0.423  0.50
Uninsky 1971   9  0.6815  0.0110  0.1011  0.4330  0.1812  0.28
Wasowski 1980   22  0.664  0.0525  0.0728  0.2136  0.0830  0.13
Weissenberg 1971   28  0.6556  0.0017  0.0916  0.3843  0.0721  0.16
Random 1    65  -0.0664  0.0065  0.0265  0.0260  0.0265  0.02
Random 2   63  0.0062  0.0063  0.0362  0.0348  0.0364  0.03
Random 3   64  -0.0259  0.0064  0.0264  0.0222  0.2447  0.07

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).