Ohlsson 1999

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   45  0.6246  0.0042  0.0742  0.0733  0.0842  0.07
Ashkenazy 1981   7  0.746  0.029  0.1310  0.5230  0.228  0.34
Beliavsky 2004   54  0.5827  0.0055  0.0362  0.0355  0.0463  0.03
BenOr 1989   10  0.737  0.0218  0.1015  0.4640  0.0821  0.19
Biret 1990   20  0.7038  0.0012  0.1316  0.4632  0.1515  0.26
Blet 2003   51  0.6035  0.0053  0.0361  0.0361  0.0464  0.03
Block 1995   14  0.7128  0.0027  0.0822  0.3323  0.339  0.33
Brailowsky 1960   58  0.5456  0.0061  0.0644  0.0649  0.0552  0.05
Chiu 1999   8  0.745  0.035  0.249  0.5225  0.406  0.46
Clidat 1994   40  0.6522  0.0039  0.0643  0.0648  0.0556  0.05
Cohen 1997   57  0.5532  0.0057  0.0457  0.0447  0.0562  0.04
Coop 1987   1  0.801  0.421  0.411  0.7714  0.522  0.63
Cortot 1951   52  0.6063  0.0056  0.0458  0.0440  0.0758  0.05
Czerny 1949   38  0.6540  0.0022  0.0629  0.2243  0.0731  0.12
Czerny 1949b   30  0.6843  0.0019  0.1021  0.3335  0.1024  0.18
Ezaki 2006   12  0.7216  0.0128  0.0923  0.3245  0.0826  0.16
Falvay 1989   16  0.7111  0.0113  0.1120  0.3630  0.2114  0.27
Ferenczy 1958   48  0.6133  0.0050  0.0553  0.0529  0.2134  0.10
Fiorentino 1962   19  0.7055  0.0014  0.1012  0.4832  0.1812  0.29
Fliere 1977   15  0.7121  0.0017  0.1314  0.4740  0.0722  0.18
Fou 1978   22  0.7010  0.0129  0.1424  0.3140  0.0827  0.16
Francois 1956   60  0.5114  0.0159  0.0555  0.0550  0.0559  0.05
Hatto 1997   32  0.6739  0.0037  0.0651  0.0631  0.1536  0.09
Horowitz 1971   46  0.6236  0.0051  0.0739  0.0747  0.0550  0.06
Horowitz 1985   61  0.5160  0.0060  0.0554  0.0555  0.0551  0.05
Indjic 2001   29  0.6849  0.0032  0.1032  0.1933  0.0832  0.12
Kapell 1951   6  0.7426  0.008  0.146  0.5532  0.1811  0.31
Kiepura 1999   39  0.6529  0.0048  0.0645  0.0642  0.0645  0.06
Kilenyi 1937   13  0.7212  0.0110  0.1511  0.5129  0.307  0.39
Kissin 1993   2  0.773  0.093  0.402  0.6925  0.334  0.48
Kitain 1937   62  0.3661  0.0062  0.0650  0.0651  0.0457  0.05
Kushner 1990   49  0.6137  0.0052  0.0648  0.0660  0.0454  0.05
Levy 1951   37  0.6625  0.0035  0.0646  0.0645  0.0646  0.06
Luisada 1990   27  0.6957  0.0038  0.0738  0.0751  0.0648  0.06
Lushtak 2004   43  0.6344  0.0044  0.0835  0.0842  0.0743  0.07
Lympany 1968   50  0.6142  0.0049  0.0456  0.0458  0.0460  0.04
Magaloff 1977   21  0.7054  0.0020  0.0825  0.2932  0.1717  0.22
Magaloff 1977b   23  0.7045  0.0021  0.0927  0.2732  0.1619  0.21
Magin 1975   3  0.772  0.212  0.293  0.6815  0.631  0.65
Milkina 1970   31  0.6823  0.0033  0.0833  0.0836  0.0838  0.08
Mohovich 1999   36  0.6650  0.0036  0.0649  0.0638  0.0649  0.06
Nadelmann 1956   44  0.6230  0.0043  0.0741  0.0739  0.0740  0.07
Ohlsson 1999   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Olejniczac 1990   17  0.7134  0.0015  0.1213  0.4834  0.1116  0.23
Olejniczak 1991   24  0.7059  0.0023  0.0918  0.3737  0.1020  0.19
Osinska 1989   9  0.7318  0.0011  0.138  0.5345  0.0818  0.21
Paderewski 1912   34  0.6619  0.0026  0.0728  0.2520  0.3113  0.28
Perahia 1994   59  0.5351  0.0045  0.0740  0.0736  0.0744  0.07
Perlemuter 1986   53  0.599  0.0147  0.0647  0.0650  0.0555  0.05
Poblocka 1999   5  0.7548  0.007  0.125  0.5633  0.1710  0.31
Rangell 2001   18  0.7152  0.0024  0.0819  0.3636  0.0925  0.18
Risler 1920   42  0.6341  0.0040  0.0834  0.0833  0.1433  0.11
Rosen 1989   47  0.6120  0.0054  0.0363  0.0343  0.0661  0.04
Rubinstein 1939   55  0.5747  0.0046  0.0552  0.0544  0.0653  0.05
Rubinstein 1952   26  0.698  0.0230  0.0930  0.2248  0.0535  0.10
Rubinstein 1966   35  0.6624  0.0041  0.0836  0.0843  0.0547  0.06
Rummel 1943   56  0.5553  0.0058  0.0360  0.0362  0.0365  0.03
Shebanova 2002   11  0.724  0.046  0.197  0.5417  0.425  0.48
Smith 1975   28  0.6913  0.0116  0.1117  0.4038  0.0823  0.18
Szpilman 1948   33  0.6631  0.0025  0.0726  0.2935  0.0828  0.15
Uninsky 1971   41  0.6458  0.0034  0.0837  0.0837  0.0641  0.07
Wasowski 1980   25  0.7015  0.0131  0.1131  0.2134  0.0930  0.14
Weissenberg 1971   4  0.7617  0.014  0.284  0.6425  0.433  0.52
Random 1    65  -0.0264  0.0064  0.0264  0.0220  0.2439  0.07
Random 2   63  0.0565  0.0063  0.0459  0.041  0.5829  0.15
Random 3   64  -0.0262  0.0065  0.0265  0.0212  0.4437  0.09

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).