Luisada 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		49	0.64	43	0.00	47	0.07	48	0.07	37	0.06	53	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		5	0.77	8	0.03	10	0.11	7	0.56	24	0.40	14	0.47
Beliavsky 2004		44	0.66	50	0.00	42	0.06	49	0.06	34	0.07	51	0.06
BenOr 1989		9	0.76	16	0.01	18	0.11	15	0.51	38	0.09	29	0.21
Biret 1990		22	0.73	19	0.00	21	0.11	20	0.48	19	0.42	15	0.45
Blet 2003		32	0.70	10	0.01	33	0.11	35	0.11	19	0.29	33	0.18
Block 1995		28	0.71	37	0.00	32	0.11	30	0.22	25	0.27	26	0.24
Brailowsky 1960		55	0.63	31	0.00	54	0.05	58	0.05	40	0.08	50	0.06
Chiu 1999		23	0.73	24	0.00	22	0.13	22	0.47	24	0.41	17	0.44
Clidat 1994		38	0.69	39	0.00	43	0.08	42	0.08	37	0.07	45	0.07
Cohen 1997		58	0.55	62	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	59	0.04	63	0.04
Coop 1987		11	0.76	58	0.00	14	0.13	14	0.52	28	0.35	21	0.43
Cortot 1951		47	0.65	59	0.00	53	0.06	52	0.06	38	0.07	56	0.06
Czerny 1949		20	0.74	12	0.01	20	0.14	18	0.50	20	0.45	13	0.47
Czerny 1949b		25	0.72	20	0.00	23	0.19	19	0.50	22	0.46	11	0.48
Ezaki 2006		1	0.80	1	0.31	1	0.31	2	0.62	16	0.55	1	0.58
Falvay 1989		21	0.74	15	0.01	25	0.10	25	0.40	41	0.08	32	0.18
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.52	65	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	62	0.04	62	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		12	0.75	33	0.00	9	0.12	5	0.57	19	0.49	4	0.53
Fliere 1977		30	0.71	44	0.00	31	0.10	32	0.22	43	0.07	37	0.12
Fou 1978		8	0.76	17	0.00	11	0.11	9	0.55	20	0.43	9	0.49
Francois 1956		61	0.51	47	0.00	62	0.06	54	0.06	56	0.04	61	0.05
Hatto 1997		45	0.66	57	0.00	46	0.10	38	0.10	53	0.05	44	0.07
Horowitz 1971		54	0.63	46	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	43	0.06	60	0.05
Horowitz 1985		59	0.55	23	0.00	57	0.05	59	0.05	38	0.07	49	0.06
Indjic 2001		41	0.67	41	0.00	44	0.10	37	0.10	47	0.06	40	0.08
Kapell 1951		10	0.76	34	0.00	12	0.17	12	0.52	21	0.36	20	0.43
Kiepura 1999		31	0.71	29	0.00	39	0.09	40	0.09	23	0.41	31	0.19
Kilenyi 1937		15	0.74	9	0.02	8	0.20	10	0.54	24	0.46	8	0.50
Kissin 1993		13	0.75	52	0.00	13	0.14	11	0.52	39	0.08	30	0.20
Kitain 1937		62	0.43	27	0.00	61	0.05	60	0.05	39	0.07	55	0.06
Kushner 1990		35	0.69	11	0.01	35	0.12	34	0.12	18	0.45	27	0.23
Levy 1951		46	0.65	45	0.00	40	0.09	41	0.09	57	0.05	42	0.07
Luisada 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Lushtak 2004		33	0.70	35	0.00	37	0.08	43	0.08	47	0.06	47	0.07
Lympany 1968		48	0.64	56	0.00	49	0.08	44	0.08	35	0.07	41	0.07
Magaloff 1977		14	0.75	28	0.00	15	0.13	13	0.52	13	0.50	7	0.51
Magaloff 1977b		18	0.74	32	0.00	19	0.11	16	0.51	16	0.46	12	0.48
Magin 1975		2	0.79	2	0.19	2	0.25	3	0.60	20	0.57	2	0.58
Milkina 1970		43	0.66	26	0.00	50	0.07	46	0.07	60	0.04	58	0.05
Mohovich 1999		34	0.70	60	0.00	38	0.10	36	0.10	43	0.05	48	0.07
Nadelmann 1956		26	0.71	5	0.04	34	0.14	33	0.14	20	0.32	28	0.21
Ohlsson 1999		36	0.69	54	0.00	41	0.06	51	0.06	38	0.07	52	0.06
Olejniczac 1990		6	0.77	18	0.00	7	0.17	4	0.59	16	0.52	3	0.55
Olejniczak 1991		7	0.76	14	0.01	6	0.13	8	0.55	17	0.50	6	0.52
Osinska 1989		3	0.78	4	0.05	3	0.20	1	0.66	29	0.30	16	0.44
Paderewski 1912		50	0.63	49	0.00	45	0.08	45	0.08	38	0.07	46	0.07
Perahia 1994		57	0.56	53	0.00	58	0.06	56	0.06	62	0.04	59	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		52	0.63	48	0.00	55	0.07	47	0.07	35	0.07	43	0.07
Poblocka 1999		4	0.78	6	0.04	4	0.19	6	0.57	20	0.47	5	0.52
Rangell 2001		16	0.74	13	0.01	17	0.10	23	0.47	21	0.38	22	0.42
Risler 1920		40	0.68	25	0.00	24	0.14	24	0.41	4	0.57	10	0.48
Rosen 1989		53	0.63	51	0.00	51	0.06	55	0.06	32	0.11	39	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		56	0.57	30	0.00	56	0.06	50	0.06	59	0.04	57	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		24	0.72	3	0.16	5	0.15	21	0.47	21	0.42	18	0.44
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.68	22	0.00	36	0.09	39	0.09	26	0.18	36	0.13
Rummel 1943		51	0.63	40	0.00	48	0.06	53	0.06	42	0.06	54	0.06
Shebanova 2002		29	0.71	21	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.25	34	0.09	34	0.15
Smith 1975		27	0.71	42	0.00	28	0.14	27	0.36	31	0.19	25	0.26
Szpilman 1948		37	0.69	38	0.00	27	0.09	28	0.34	24	0.33	24	0.33
Uninsky 1971		42	0.67	36	0.00	29	0.09	31	0.22	44	0.06	38	0.11
Wasowski 1980		17	0.74	7	0.03	26	0.11	26	0.37	20	0.41	23	0.39
Weissenberg 1971		19	0.74	63	0.00	16	0.10	17	0.50	28	0.37	19	0.43
Random 1		65	-0.04	55	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	54	0.03	65	0.02
Random 2		63	0.04	64	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	5	0.47	35	0.14
Random 3		64	-0.03	61	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	35	0.05	64	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).