Chiu 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		48	0.64	49	0.00	45	0.06	47	0.06	41	0.06	51	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		13	0.75	13	0.01	17	0.13	19	0.49	19	0.46	20	0.47
Beliavsky 2004		34	0.69	36	0.00	35	0.10	37	0.10	9	0.44	35	0.21
BenOr 1989		19	0.74	9	0.02	12	0.14	5	0.62	26	0.29	24	0.42
Biret 1990		28	0.70	47	0.00	28	0.09	27	0.28	28	0.20	33	0.24
Blet 2003		36	0.68	18	0.01	38	0.11	36	0.11	25	0.23	38	0.16
Block 1995		12	0.76	35	0.00	14	0.10	17	0.53	7	0.58	10	0.55
Brailowsky 1960		55	0.56	65	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	60	0.04	62	0.04
Chiu 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Clidat 1994		26	0.70	28	0.00	29	0.09	28	0.28	14	0.35	29	0.31
Cohen 1997		56	0.56	37	0.00	61	0.05	55	0.05	46	0.05	58	0.05
Coop 1987		1	0.83	1	0.39	1	0.38	2	0.71	10	0.58	3	0.64
Cortot 1951		44	0.65	62	0.00	50	0.07	43	0.07	15	0.46	37	0.18
Czerny 1949		35	0.68	27	0.00	25	0.15	26	0.33	26	0.33	28	0.33
Czerny 1949b		38	0.67	39	0.00	27	0.10	31	0.22	27	0.30	31	0.26
Ezaki 2006		3	0.82	4	0.03	3	0.29	3	0.68	11	0.60	2	0.64
Falvay 1989		2	0.82	2	0.26	2	0.43	1	0.82	2	0.78	1	0.80
Ferenczy 1958		54	0.57	17	0.01	55	0.04	59	0.04	35	0.08	50	0.06
Fiorentino 1962		17	0.75	46	0.00	16	0.14	10	0.59	12	0.57	5	0.58
Fliere 1977		20	0.74	15	0.01	23	0.18	15	0.54	20	0.46	14	0.50
Fou 1978		16	0.75	16	0.01	20	0.12	22	0.48	26	0.36	23	0.42
Francois 1956		59	0.51	33	0.00	59	0.04	57	0.04	39	0.06	61	0.05
Hatto 1997		33	0.69	19	0.01	31	0.11	30	0.23	4	0.66	25	0.39
Horowitz 1971		53	0.59	14	0.01	53	0.06	50	0.06	51	0.04	59	0.05
Horowitz 1985		61	0.49	41	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	41	0.06	53	0.05
Indjic 2001		32	0.69	45	0.00	30	0.09	29	0.26	6	0.58	26	0.39
Kapell 1951		10	0.78	8	0.02	10	0.17	18	0.51	18	0.45	17	0.48
Kiepura 1999		31	0.70	24	0.00	33	0.14	34	0.14	3	0.62	30	0.29
Kilenyi 1937		9	0.78	11	0.01	5	0.21	6	0.61	18	0.54	6	0.57
Kissin 1993		7	0.79	6	0.02	7	0.20	8	0.60	15	0.44	13	0.51
Kitain 1937		62	0.41	34	0.00	62	0.06	52	0.06	63	0.03	64	0.04
Kushner 1990		45	0.65	53	0.00	46	0.06	49	0.06	32	0.20	42	0.11
Levy 1951		39	0.66	58	0.00	40	0.10	39	0.10	52	0.06	46	0.08
Luisada 1990		23	0.73	42	0.00	26	0.16	24	0.41	22	0.47	22	0.44
Lushtak 2004		29	0.70	32	0.00	37	0.15	33	0.15	20	0.38	32	0.24
Lympany 1968		46	0.64	64	0.00	49	0.06	46	0.06	51	0.05	52	0.05
Magaloff 1977		18	0.75	48	0.00	21	0.17	20	0.49	17	0.46	18	0.47
Magaloff 1977b		21	0.74	51	0.00	22	0.13	23	0.48	18	0.46	19	0.47
Magin 1975		8	0.79	12	0.01	8	0.32	12	0.58	24	0.55	8	0.56
Milkina 1970		41	0.65	50	0.00	48	0.09	40	0.09	39	0.07	47	0.08
Mohovich 1999		49	0.63	60	0.00	43	0.06	45	0.06	57	0.04	57	0.05
Nadelmann 1956		47	0.64	30	0.00	44	0.05	54	0.05	43	0.06	54	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.74	7	0.02	18	0.12	25	0.40	9	0.52	21	0.46
Olejniczac 1990		15	0.75	26	0.00	13	0.15	9	0.60	14	0.55	7	0.57
Olejniczak 1991		11	0.76	44	0.00	11	0.17	11	0.58	16	0.51	11	0.54
Osinska 1989		14	0.75	23	0.00	15	0.11	7	0.60	32	0.18	27	0.33
Paderewski 1912		50	0.63	40	0.00	41	0.05	53	0.05	53	0.05	55	0.05
Perahia 1994		60	0.50	38	0.00	57	0.04	58	0.04	44	0.06	56	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		52	0.61	22	0.00	47	0.08	42	0.08	26	0.26	40	0.14
Poblocka 1999		6	0.80	21	0.00	4	0.18	4	0.63	14	0.56	4	0.59
Rangell 2001		5	0.80	25	0.00	9	0.26	14	0.55	12	0.53	12	0.54
Risler 1920		37	0.67	61	0.00	34	0.10	38	0.10	20	0.42	36	0.20
Rosen 1989		43	0.65	10	0.01	51	0.08	41	0.08	21	0.31	39	0.16
Rubinstein 1939		57	0.55	31	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	62	0.03	65	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.66	43	0.00	42	0.06	51	0.06	38	0.05	60	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		51	0.62	52	0.00	52	0.06	48	0.06	37	0.06	49	0.06
Rummel 1943		58	0.55	55	0.00	54	0.05	56	0.05	49	0.04	63	0.04
Shebanova 2002		24	0.73	3	0.05	24	0.20	21	0.48	9	0.52	16	0.50
Smith 1975		30	0.70	54	0.00	32	0.10	32	0.20	35	0.09	41	0.13
Szpilman 1948		42	0.65	56	0.00	39	0.07	44	0.07	33	0.10	45	0.08
Uninsky 1971		25	0.72	29	0.00	19	0.12	16	0.53	13	0.47	15	0.50
Wasowski 1980		27	0.70	20	0.01	36	0.13	35	0.13	27	0.34	34	0.21
Weissenberg 1971		4	0.80	5	0.03	6	0.19	13	0.57	12	0.53	9	0.55
Random 1		64	0.00	63	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	8	0.41	44	0.09
Random 2		63	0.02	57	0.00	63	0.02	63	0.02	24	0.31	48	0.08
Random 3		65	-0.02	59	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	9	0.48	43	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).