Biret 1990

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   39  0.6841  0.0050  0.0741  0.0749  0.0558  0.06
Ashkenazy 1981   3  0.7710  0.017  0.174  0.689  0.572  0.62
Beliavsky 2004   50  0.6415  0.0143  0.0839  0.0823  0.2646  0.14
BenOr 1989   6  0.768  0.029  0.143  0.6919  0.409  0.53
Biret 1990   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Blet 2003   38  0.6834  0.0048  0.0836  0.0833  0.1152  0.09
Block 1995   18  0.7223  0.0035  0.0743  0.0719  0.4436  0.18
Brailowsky 1960   52  0.6444  0.0057  0.0653  0.0628  0.3642  0.15
Chiu 1999   32  0.7054  0.0030  0.0928  0.2027  0.2830  0.24
Clidat 1994   25  0.7119  0.0036  0.0934  0.0919  0.2841  0.16
Cohen 1997   57  0.6049  0.0060  0.0558  0.0520  0.2849  0.12
Coop 1987   12  0.7439  0.0013  0.149  0.5927  0.3616  0.46
Cortot 1951   47  0.6661  0.0054  0.0562  0.0513  0.4744  0.15
Czerny 1949   43  0.6752  0.0028  0.0829  0.1932  0.2232  0.20
Czerny 1949b   51  0.6456  0.0038  0.0557  0.0534  0.1154  0.07
Ezaki 2006   4  0.773  0.076  0.1910  0.5821  0.4412  0.51
Falvay 1989   35  0.6963  0.0041  0.0646  0.0644  0.0755  0.06
Ferenczy 1958   59  0.5858  0.0059  0.0559  0.0545  0.0662  0.05
Fiorentino 1962   11  0.7413  0.0114  0.128  0.6014  0.557  0.57
Fliere 1977   22  0.7220  0.0029  0.0827  0.2035  0.0847  0.13
Fou 1978   26  0.7116  0.0124  0.1318  0.4325  0.3722  0.40
Francois 1956   61  0.4645  0.0062  0.0654  0.0649  0.0563  0.05
Hatto 1997   46  0.6664  0.0053  0.0647  0.0640  0.0657  0.06
Horowitz 1971   40  0.6821  0.0044  0.0650  0.065  0.5638  0.18
Horowitz 1985   55  0.6217  0.0151  0.0656  0.064  0.6133  0.19
Indjic 2001   41  0.6860  0.0049  0.0837  0.0834  0.0853  0.08
Kapell 1951   10  0.756  0.044  0.1411  0.5715  0.528  0.54
Kiepura 1999   45  0.6732  0.0052  0.0655  0.0629  0.2648  0.12
Kilenyi 1937   23  0.7128  0.0011  0.1215  0.4925  0.4615  0.47
Kissin 1993   2  0.774  0.052  0.222  0.7113  0.455  0.57
Kitain 1937   62  0.4659  0.0061  0.0648  0.0630  0.2350  0.12
Kushner 1990   34  0.6937  0.0042  0.0835  0.0813  0.4831  0.20
Levy 1951   42  0.6818  0.0025  0.0926  0.2218  0.4725  0.32
Luisada 1990   14  0.7343  0.0023  0.0819  0.4220  0.4818  0.45
Lushtak 2004   33  0.7048  0.0039  0.0649  0.0618  0.4043  0.15
Lympany 1968   37  0.6926  0.0045  0.0745  0.0716  0.4434  0.18
Magaloff 1977   21  0.7235  0.0026  0.1221  0.3919  0.4620  0.42
Magaloff 1977b   20  0.7247  0.0027  0.1722  0.3820  0.4421  0.41
Magin 1975   15  0.7340  0.0021  0.0920  0.4129  0.4619  0.43
Milkina 1970   17  0.735  0.0417  0.1524  0.3116  0.4623  0.38
Mohovich 1999   31  0.7025  0.0033  0.0838  0.0825  0.4137  0.18
Nadelmann 1956   27  0.7133  0.0031  0.0830  0.1815  0.3829  0.26
Ohlsson 1999   30  0.7051  0.0032  0.0832  0.1516  0.4628  0.26
Olejniczac 1990   9  0.759  0.0112  0.135  0.6219  0.526  0.57
Olejniczak 1991   5  0.7629  0.005  0.197  0.6114  0.564  0.58
Osinska 1989   1  0.791  0.461  0.451  0.8210  0.551  0.67
Paderewski 1912   49  0.6531  0.0046  0.0840  0.0832  0.1651  0.11
Perahia 1994   58  0.6030  0.0047  0.0744  0.0716  0.3940  0.17
Perlemuter 1986   56  0.6222  0.0055  0.0561  0.0534  0.0756  0.06
Poblocka 1999   7  0.7627  0.008  0.1212  0.5719  0.4810  0.52
Rangell 2001   16  0.7357  0.0019  0.1614  0.5216  0.4813  0.50
Risler 1920   48  0.6536  0.0040  0.0742  0.0719  0.4435  0.18
Rosen 1989   54  0.6250  0.0058  0.0651  0.0645  0.0660  0.06
Rubinstein 1939   53  0.647  0.0322  0.0931  0.1616  0.4327  0.26
Rubinstein 1952   13  0.732  0.143  0.2013  0.565  0.633  0.59
Rubinstein 1966   24  0.7114  0.0116  0.0923  0.379  0.5617  0.46
Rummel 1943   60  0.5738  0.0056  0.0560  0.0535  0.0759  0.06
Shebanova 2002   29  0.7042  0.0034  0.1033  0.1023  0.2939  0.17
Smith 1975   28  0.7155  0.0018  0.1716  0.4725  0.2924  0.37
Szpilman 1948   19  0.7211  0.0120  0.1117  0.4416  0.5014  0.47
Uninsky 1971   44  0.6712  0.0115  0.1125  0.2826  0.3026  0.29
Wasowski 1980   36  0.6946  0.0037  0.0652  0.0628  0.3445  0.14
Weissenberg 1971   8  0.7524  0.0010  0.146  0.6223  0.4411  0.52
Random 1    64  -0.0353  0.0064  0.0264  0.0228  0.1361  0.05
Random 2   63  0.0262  0.0063  0.0363  0.0355  0.0364  0.03
Random 3   65  -0.0465  0.0065  0.0265  0.0258  0.0365  0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).