BenOr 1989

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   42  0.725  0.0345  0.0936  0.094  0.6337  0.24
Ashkenazy 1981   16  0.7829  0.0024  0.1016  0.428  0.5820  0.49
Beliavsky 2004   51  0.6855  0.0052  0.0459  0.0417  0.3259  0.11
BenOr 1989   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Biret 1990   23  0.7614  0.0117  0.1119  0.403  0.6917  0.53
Blet 2003   26  0.7524  0.0028  0.0925  0.303  0.7521  0.47
Block 1995   14  0.7911  0.0119  0.1218  0.411  0.7915  0.57
Brailowsky 1960   46  0.7238  0.0046  0.0937  0.091  0.7633  0.26
Chiu 1999   32  0.7445  0.0026  0.1426  0.295  0.6226  0.42
Clidat 1994   36  0.7458  0.0041  0.0653  0.0610  0.4553  0.16
Cohen 1997   60  0.6053  0.0062  0.0650  0.0617  0.3455  0.14
Coop 1987   13  0.7916  0.019  0.1811  0.5711  0.5814  0.57
Cortot 1951   55  0.6461  0.0060  0.0462  0.0434  0.0962  0.06
Czerny 1949   40  0.7356  0.0034  0.0939  0.0921  0.4246  0.19
Czerny 1949b   43  0.7262  0.0039  0.0554  0.0521  0.4754  0.15
Ezaki 2006   3  0.824  0.054  0.297  0.635  0.687  0.65
Falvay 1989   4  0.818  0.027  0.385  0.654  0.783  0.71
Ferenczy 1958   50  0.7060  0.0050  0.0746  0.072  0.7039  0.22
Fiorentino 1962   15  0.7932  0.0012  0.1413  0.536  0.7211  0.62
Fliere 1977   11  0.799  0.0113  0.1710  0.574  0.718  0.64
Fou 1978   6  0.802  0.112  0.332  0.691  0.762  0.72
Francois 1956   58  0.6217  0.0158  0.0555  0.053  0.6947  0.19
Hatto 1997   49  0.7054  0.0053  0.0651  0.0616  0.4552  0.16
Horowitz 1971   52  0.6841  0.0054  0.0649  0.066  0.5651  0.18
Horowitz 1985   61  0.5764  0.0059  0.0461  0.0418  0.3656  0.12
Indjic 2001   45  0.7242  0.0048  0.0745  0.0715  0.4850  0.18
Kapell 1951   5  0.806  0.025  0.253  0.671  0.744  0.70
Kiepura 1999   30  0.7526  0.0040  0.0652  0.062  0.6743  0.20
Kilenyi 1937   10  0.7913  0.016  0.266  0.631  0.726  0.67
Kissin 1993   18  0.7820  0.0018  0.1117  0.4116  0.4427  0.42
Kitain 1937   62  0.4947  0.0061  0.0460  0.0417  0.3758  0.12
Kushner 1990   44  0.7231  0.0042  0.0648  0.065  0.6544  0.20
Levy 1951   47  0.7239  0.0035  0.0841  0.086  0.6838  0.23
Luisada 1990   25  0.7634  0.0036  0.0938  0.0915  0.5142  0.21
Lushtak 2004   38  0.7340  0.0043  0.0842  0.089  0.5940  0.22
Lympany 1968   31  0.7518  0.0031  0.0831  0.181  0.7430  0.36
Magaloff 1977   19  0.7749  0.0021  0.0924  0.323  0.6222  0.45
Magaloff 1977b   20  0.7746  0.0022  0.0723  0.333  0.6223  0.45
Magin 1975   7  0.8044  0.0014  0.1914  0.508  0.6813  0.58
Milkina 1970   22  0.7612  0.0130  0.0830  0.203  0.7429  0.38
Mohovich 1999   17  0.7828  0.0025  0.1220  0.402  0.7816  0.56
Nadelmann 1956   37  0.7335  0.0033  0.1035  0.104  0.6336  0.25
Ohlsson 1999   41  0.7315  0.0144  0.0840  0.0815  0.4645  0.19
Olejniczac 1990   8  0.7910  0.0110  0.249  0.587  0.699  0.63
Olejniczak 1991   12  0.7936  0.0011  0.2412  0.566  0.6910  0.62
Osinska 1989   1  0.841  0.551  0.551  0.832  0.791  0.81
Paderewski 1912   54  0.6650  0.0049  0.0556  0.0522  0.2857  0.12
Perahia 1994   57  0.6430  0.0056  0.0647  0.0610  0.5249  0.18
Perlemuter 1986   48  0.7127  0.0047  0.1034  0.103  0.6834  0.26
Poblocka 1999   2  0.823  0.063  0.334  0.664  0.735  0.69
Rangell 2001   21  0.7751  0.0023  0.0822  0.3411  0.5424  0.43
Risler 1920   56  0.6463  0.0051  0.0458  0.0430  0.2660  0.10
Rosen 1989   39  0.737  0.0238  0.0744  0.073  0.7041  0.22
Rubinstein 1939   59  0.6252  0.0057  0.0457  0.0433  0.1061  0.06
Rubinstein 1952   27  0.7525  0.0020  0.0927  0.288  0.5928  0.41
Rubinstein 1966   34  0.7421  0.0032  0.0832  0.155  0.7232  0.33
Rummel 1943   53  0.6733  0.0055  0.0743  0.0710  0.4748  0.18
Shebanova 2002   24  0.7622  0.0016  0.1121  0.386  0.6519  0.50
Smith 1975   33  0.7448  0.0029  0.0929  0.259  0.5031  0.35
Szpilman 1948   35  0.7443  0.0027  0.1228  0.286  0.6325  0.42
Uninsky 1971   28  0.7519  0.0015  0.1015  0.421  0.6418  0.52
Wasowski 1980   29  0.7537  0.0037  0.1033  0.103  0.6535  0.25
Weissenberg 1971   9  0.7923  0.008  0.178  0.594  0.6412  0.61
Random 1    64  -0.0365  0.0064  0.0264  0.0238  0.0563  0.03
Random 2   63  0.0057  0.0063  0.0363  0.0362  0.0265  0.02
Random 3   65  -0.0459  0.0065  0.0265  0.0234  0.0564  0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).