Ashkenazy 1981

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		34	0.72	5	0.03	35	0.10	33	0.10	3	0.63	32	0.25
Ashkenazy 1981		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Beliavsky 2004		50	0.66	27	0.00	50	0.07	45	0.07	30	0.18	52	0.11
BenOr 1989		5	0.78	7	0.02	3	0.12	8	0.58	16	0.42	16	0.49
Biret 1990		13	0.77	9	0.02	12	0.15	9	0.57	4	0.68	7	0.62
Blet 2003		37	0.71	8	0.02	19	0.10	31	0.18	14	0.45	31	0.28
Block 1995		30	0.73	56	0.00	36	0.10	34	0.10	20	0.44	35	0.21
Brailowsky 1960		55	0.62	47	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	37	0.09	59	0.06
Chiu 1999		18	0.75	11	0.01	16	0.14	19	0.46	19	0.49	19	0.47
Clidat 1994		42	0.70	36	0.00	42	0.07	48	0.07	30	0.09	57	0.08
Cohen 1997		56	0.61	43	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	7	0.53	44	0.16
Coop 1987		15	0.77	42	0.00	13	0.11	14	0.50	21	0.45	20	0.47
Cortot 1951		49	0.66	55	0.00	54	0.06	55	0.06	12	0.47	41	0.17
Czerny 1949		35	0.72	60	0.00	34	0.09	36	0.09	25	0.35	39	0.18
Czerny 1949b		24	0.75	50	0.00	15	0.12	15	0.49	6	0.68	10	0.58
Ezaki 2006		3	0.79	6	0.02	9	0.16	10	0.55	15	0.56	12	0.55
Falvay 1989		20	0.75	20	0.00	28	0.09	28	0.27	23	0.43	28	0.34
Ferenczy 1958		59	0.58	59	0.00	60	0.05	59	0.05	58	0.04	63	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		31	0.72	52	0.00	33	0.08	38	0.08	30	0.24	48	0.14
Fliere 1977		7	0.78	12	0.01	11	0.17	7	0.60	7	0.64	6	0.62
Fou 1978		4	0.79	10	0.02	6	0.18	2	0.68	3	0.68	3	0.68
Francois 1956		60	0.57	24	0.00	61	0.05	58	0.05	22	0.31	51	0.12
Hatto 1997		23	0.75	21	0.00	25	0.13	21	0.44	2	0.80	8	0.59
Horowitz 1971		53	0.64	58	0.00	53	0.05	60	0.05	39	0.06	62	0.05
Horowitz 1985		61	0.56	57	0.00	59	0.03	63	0.03	30	0.21	56	0.08
Indjic 2001		19	0.75	18	0.00	18	0.11	12	0.53	2	0.80	5	0.65
Kapell 1951		12	0.77	45	0.00	10	0.16	13	0.53	14	0.52	13	0.52
Kiepura 1999		40	0.70	31	0.00	45	0.06	49	0.06	21	0.45	42	0.16
Kilenyi 1937		14	0.77	30	0.00	8	0.18	5	0.63	16	0.55	9	0.59
Kissin 1993		6	0.78	13	0.01	7	0.13	6	0.63	18	0.43	14	0.52
Kitain 1937		62	0.49	46	0.00	62	0.06	53	0.06	14	0.42	45	0.16
Kushner 1990		47	0.68	39	0.00	49	0.07	47	0.07	27	0.25	49	0.13
Levy 1951		44	0.68	25	0.00	37	0.08	37	0.08	19	0.41	38	0.18
Luisada 1990		9	0.77	41	0.00	22	0.11	24	0.40	7	0.56	21	0.47
Lushtak 2004		25	0.74	16	0.01	30	0.10	26	0.31	7	0.65	24	0.45
Lympany 1968		48	0.67	37	0.00	47	0.08	42	0.08	20	0.41	37	0.18
Magaloff 1977		17	0.76	51	0.00	21	0.10	20	0.45	9	0.52	17	0.48
Magaloff 1977b		16	0.76	33	0.00	17	0.11	17	0.46	7	0.54	15	0.50
Magin 1975		2	0.80	4	0.03	4	0.15	3	0.67	4	0.70	2	0.68
Milkina 1970		39	0.71	28	0.00	44	0.07	46	0.07	25	0.29	47	0.14
Mohovich 1999		43	0.69	34	0.00	46	0.07	44	0.07	41	0.06	61	0.06
Nadelmann 1956		41	0.70	23	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.08	24	0.27	46	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.74	48	0.00	31	0.11	30	0.22	10	0.52	29	0.34
Olejniczac 1990		29	0.74	44	0.00	26	0.11	25	0.35	29	0.38	27	0.36
Olejniczak 1991		21	0.75	53	0.00	20	0.10	22	0.44	21	0.48	23	0.46
Osinska 1989		1	0.82	1	0.57	1	0.56	1	0.79	3	0.71	1	0.75
Paderewski 1912		46	0.68	62	0.00	43	0.08	40	0.08	15	0.38	40	0.17
Perahia 1994		58	0.59	29	0.00	51	0.05	56	0.05	26	0.22	53	0.10
Perlemuter 1986		45	0.68	35	0.00	48	0.06	51	0.06	16	0.44	43	0.16
Poblocka 1999		8	0.78	38	0.00	14	0.18	16	0.48	22	0.46	18	0.47
Rangell 2001		11	0.77	3	0.06	2	0.18	11	0.55	5	0.58	11	0.56
Risler 1920		57	0.60	63	0.00	55	0.06	50	0.06	34	0.13	54	0.09
Rosen 1989		52	0.64	32	0.00	56	0.06	54	0.06	48	0.06	60	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		51	0.65	40	0.00	41	0.08	41	0.08	11	0.51	36	0.20
Rubinstein 1952		10	0.77	2	0.08	5	0.15	4	0.63	3	0.73	4	0.68
Rubinstein 1966		36	0.71	19	0.00	40	0.08	43	0.08	11	0.55	34	0.21
Rummel 1943		54	0.62	49	0.00	52	0.06	52	0.06	29	0.23	50	0.12
Shebanova 2002		32	0.72	26	0.00	38	0.09	35	0.09	33	0.09	55	0.09
Smith 1975		26	0.74	15	0.01	23	0.10	18	0.46	14	0.47	22	0.46
Szpilman 1948		38	0.71	54	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.12	20	0.46	33	0.23
Uninsky 1971		33	0.72	22	0.00	29	0.09	27	0.28	19	0.42	30	0.34
Wasowski 1980		22	0.75	14	0.01	27	0.10	29	0.27	6	0.60	26	0.40
Weissenberg 1971		27	0.74	17	0.01	24	0.11	23	0.43	24	0.43	25	0.43
Random 1		65	-0.07	65	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	64	0.02	65	0.02
Random 2		63	0.02	64	0.00	63	0.03	62	0.03	35	0.06	64	0.04
Random 3		64	-0.01	61	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	16	0.33	58	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).