Rangell 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		32	0.69	32	0.00	37	0.05	48	0.05	14	0.39	31	0.14
Bacha 1997		25	0.71	27	0.00	30	0.09	27	0.09	17	0.34	25	0.17
Barbosa 1983		31	0.70	40	0.00	36	0.06	39	0.06	25	0.13	41	0.09
Biret 1990		45	0.65	18	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.06	27	0.10	43	0.08
Block 1995		42	0.66	6	0.02	10	0.15	22	0.26	2	0.66	11	0.41
Brailowsky 1960		38	0.68	28	0.00	43	0.04	50	0.04	32	0.07	52	0.05
Chiu 1999		41	0.66	51	0.00	46	0.05	43	0.05	46	0.05	53	0.05
Clidat 1994		15	0.75	5	0.02	14	0.10	14	0.35	19	0.23	19	0.28
Cohen 1997		33	0.69	24	0.00	35	0.06	40	0.06	25	0.16	35	0.10
Cortot 1951		39	0.67	20	0.00	33	0.06	37	0.06	7	0.51	27	0.17
Csalog 1996		5	0.80	34	0.00	4	0.18	4	0.57	11	0.44	7	0.50
Czerny 1990		24	0.71	42	0.00	31	0.08	29	0.08	39	0.05	49	0.06
Ezaki 2006		11	0.77	15	0.01	8	0.13	7	0.52	15	0.42	8	0.47
Ferenczy 1958		26	0.71	38	0.00	19	0.09	15	0.34	33	0.07	28	0.15
Fliere 1977		30	0.70	44	0.00	26	0.06	26	0.12	38	0.07	37	0.09
Fou 1978		8	0.77	10	0.01	15	0.10	19	0.30	24	0.31	17	0.30
Francois 1956		50	0.46	52	0.00	50	0.06	35	0.06	26	0.10	45	0.08
Grinberg 1951		29	0.70	39	0.00	20	0.09	24	0.19	10	0.47	16	0.30
Hatto 1993		19	0.74	53	0.00	22	0.09	20	0.30	24	0.28	18	0.29
Hatto 1997		16	0.75	47	0.00	17	0.09	13	0.38	27	0.13	22	0.22
Indjic 2001		18	0.74	46	0.00	23	0.12	18	0.30	24	0.19	21	0.24
Jonas 1947		34	0.69	26	0.00	42	0.05	49	0.05	14	0.28	33	0.12
Kapell 1951		13	0.76	17	0.00	13	0.10	9	0.43	28	0.08	24	0.19
Kiepura 1999		49	0.54	29	0.00	47	0.05	46	0.05	35	0.07	48	0.06
Kushner 1989		6	0.78	9	0.01	6	0.23	6	0.56	12	0.47	5	0.51
Luisada 1991		48	0.59	45	0.00	38	0.06	41	0.06	19	0.30	32	0.13
Lushtak 2004		4	0.80	11	0.01	5	0.24	5	0.57	6	0.57	2	0.57
Magaloff 1978		35	0.68	14	0.01	29	0.06	33	0.06	28	0.08	46	0.07
Meguri 1997		2	0.83	2	0.16	2	0.47	2	0.79	3	0.61	1	0.69
Milkina 1970		14	0.76	43	0.00	12	0.10	12	0.39	25	0.16	20	0.25
Mohovich 1999		20	0.73	48	0.00	25	0.06	25	0.14	39	0.06	40	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		46	0.64	36	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.06	32	0.09	47	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		3	0.81	19	0.00	3	0.30	3	0.62	12	0.49	4	0.55
Olejniczak 1990		17	0.75	49	0.00	18	0.10	16	0.34	12	0.40	12	0.37
Osinska 1989		37	0.68	4	0.02	27	0.06	34	0.06	10	0.46	26	0.17
Rangell 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Richter 1976		44	0.65	25	0.00	44	0.05	47	0.05	36	0.07	50	0.06
Rubinstein 1938		21	0.73	7	0.02	24	0.12	23	0.23	7	0.55	14	0.36
Rubinstein 1952		28	0.70	8	0.01	28	0.06	36	0.06	14	0.39	29	0.15
Rubinstein 1961		47	0.64	13	0.01	49	0.08	28	0.08	28	0.08	44	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		43	0.65	35	0.00	48	0.07	30	0.07	26	0.14	36	0.10
Shebanova 2002		7	0.78	3	0.04	7	0.13	10	0.42	4	0.60	6	0.50
Smidowicz 1948		9	0.77	21	0.00	11	0.10	11	0.41	8	0.51	9	0.46
Smidowicz 1948b		12	0.76	22	0.00	16	0.10	17	0.30	11	0.43	13	0.36
Smith 1975		36	0.68	33	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.06	27	0.10	42	0.08
Sofronitsky 1949		40	0.67	37	0.00	45	0.05	44	0.05	14	0.39	30	0.14
Sztompka 1959		22	0.72	23	0.00	34	0.05	45	0.05	1	0.77	23	0.20
Tomsic 1995		23	0.72	12	0.01	21	0.09	21	0.27	15	0.43	15	0.34
Uninsky 1971		27	0.71	16	0.00	40	0.07	31	0.07	44	0.05	51	0.06
Wasowski 1980		10	0.77	31	0.00	9	0.15	8	0.43	12	0.48	10	0.45
Average Tempo		1	0.86	1	0.59	1	0.58	1	0.84	17	0.36	3	0.55
Random 1		52	0.05	41	0.00	52	0.02	51	0.02	8	0.40	39	0.09
Random 2		53	0.00	50	0.00	53	0.02	53	0.02	5	0.44	38	0.09
Random 3		51	0.07	30	0.00	51	0.02	52	0.02	1	0.58	34	0.11

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).