Random 2

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		49	-0.05	16	0.01	36	0.05	37	0.05	52	0.02	34	0.03
Bacha 1997		27	0.00	33	0.00	28	0.06	29	0.06	52	0.02	26	0.03
Barbosa 1983		46	-0.04	40	0.00	44	0.04	43	0.04	51	0.02	43	0.03
Biret 1990		26	0.00	29	0.00	41	0.06	26	0.06	52	0.02	38	0.03
Block 1995		8	0.03	27	0.00	7	0.08	8	0.39	51	0.03	7	0.11
Brailowsky 1960		6	0.04	2	0.11	2	0.18	2	0.52	50	0.04	3	0.14
Chiu 1999		16	0.01	30	0.00	21	0.07	21	0.17	50	0.03	19	0.07
Clidat 1994		45	-0.04	35	0.00	47	0.03	49	0.03	52	0.02	50	0.02
Cohen 1997		5	0.05	17	0.01	14	0.10	9	0.33	50	0.03	9	0.10
Cortot 1951		17	0.01	51	0.00	27	0.05	35	0.05	51	0.02	40	0.03
Csalog 1996		10	0.02	21	0.01	6	0.08	7	0.40	50	0.04	4	0.13
Czerny 1990		15	0.01	9	0.03	32	0.06	28	0.06	52	0.02	37	0.03
Ezaki 2006		51	-0.09	47	0.00	51	0.02	51	0.02	52	0.02	47	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		25	0.00	39	0.00	34	0.05	31	0.05	51	0.02	29	0.03
Fliere 1977		37	-0.02	44	0.00	49	0.04	46	0.04	52	0.02	28	0.03
Fou 1978		18	0.01	25	0.01	11	0.10	10	0.32	50	0.03	8	0.10
Francois 1956		3	0.08	13	0.02	15	0.10	16	0.27	50	0.03	14	0.09
Grinberg 1951		7	0.03	12	0.02	13	0.10	13	0.31	50	0.02	17	0.08
Hatto 1993		36	-0.01	48	0.00	42	0.04	45	0.04	52	0.02	39	0.03
Hatto 1997		13	0.01	36	0.00	29	0.05	36	0.05	52	0.02	27	0.03
Indjic 2001		11	0.02	42	0.00	30	0.05	33	0.05	52	0.02	32	0.03
Jonas 1947		34	-0.01	20	0.01	33	0.06	27	0.06	51	0.02	31	0.03
Kapell 1951		43	-0.03	52	0.00	50	0.04	44	0.04	52	0.02	35	0.03
Kiepura 1999		39	-0.02	49	0.00	45	0.03	47	0.03	52	0.02	48	0.02
Kushner 1989		20	0.00	28	0.00	12	0.09	14	0.29	50	0.03	11	0.09
Luisada 1991		4	0.07	15	0.01	9	0.09	12	0.32	51	0.02	15	0.08
Lushtak 2004		19	0.00	43	0.00	25	0.05	24	0.10	51	0.02	23	0.04
Magaloff 1978		35	-0.01	18	0.01	19	0.07	18	0.20	50	0.03	16	0.08
Meguri 1997		9	0.03	38	0.00	8	0.09	4	0.45	51	0.03	6	0.12
Milkina 1970		14	0.01	26	0.01	16	0.09	11	0.32	50	0.03	10	0.10
Mohovich 1999		31	0.00	8	0.03	31	0.05	39	0.05	50	0.02	33	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		2	0.09	4	0.07	3	0.21	3	0.47	50	0.03	5	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		12	0.01	7	0.03	10	0.11	6	0.42	51	0.02	13	0.09
Olejniczak 1990		41	-0.02	50	0.00	43	0.04	41	0.04	52	0.02	44	0.03
Osinska 1989		50	-0.07	37	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	52	0.02	49	0.02
Rangell 2001		21	0.00	5	0.07	5	0.11	5	0.44	52	0.02	12	0.09
Richter 1976		42	-0.03	22	0.01	48	0.03	50	0.03	51	0.02	51	0.02
Rubinstein 1938		28	0.00	32	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.05	52	0.02	41	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		24	0.00	31	0.00	38	0.06	30	0.06	50	0.02	45	0.03
Rubinstein 1961		30	0.00	14	0.01	40	0.04	42	0.04	52	0.02	42	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		23	0.00	11	0.02	39	0.04	40	0.04	52	0.02	46	0.03
Shebanova 2002		22	0.00	24	0.01	22	0.06	22	0.13	51	0.02	22	0.05
Smidowicz 1948		33	0.00	45	0.00	26	0.05	32	0.05	51	0.02	36	0.03
Smidowicz 1948b		29	0.00	46	0.00	18	0.08	19	0.20	51	0.03	18	0.08
Smith 1975		32	0.00	6	0.03	20	0.07	20	0.17	51	0.02	21	0.06
Sofronitsky 1949		38	-0.02	19	0.01	35	0.05	34	0.05	51	0.02	30	0.03
Sztompka 1959		48	-0.05	23	0.01	24	0.05	25	0.10	52	0.02	25	0.04
Tomsic 1995		40	-0.02	34	0.00	17	0.08	15	0.27	51	0.02	20	0.07
Uninsky 1971		47	-0.05	41	0.00	46	0.03	48	0.03	51	0.02	52	0.02
Wasowski 1980		1	0.10	1	0.30	1	0.29	1	0.60	49	0.04	2	0.15
Random 1		52	-0.19	10	0.02	23	0.05	23	0.10	52	0.02	24	0.04
Random 2		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 3		44	-0.03	3	0.11	4	0.10	17	0.23	15	0.22	1	0.22

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).