Niedzielski 1931

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		47	0.50	10	0.01	39	0.04	49	0.04	34	0.08	43	0.06
Bacha 1997		11	0.68	22	0.00	16	0.11	16	0.27	14	0.38	8	0.32
Barbosa 1983		44	0.50	23	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.05	32	0.08	45	0.06
Biret 1990		18	0.65	9	0.01	31	0.09	29	0.09	20	0.20	21	0.13
Block 1995		38	0.55	25	0.00	36	0.05	43	0.05	10	0.48	19	0.15
Brailowsky 1960		31	0.61	33	0.00	34	0.07	35	0.07	45	0.05	40	0.06
Chiu 1999		25	0.63	20	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.08	42	0.05	41	0.06
Clidat 1994		40	0.55	43	0.00	42	0.05	40	0.05	47	0.05	46	0.05
Cohen 1997		4	0.73	21	0.00	10	0.12	10	0.38	10	0.43	5	0.40
Cortot 1951		7	0.72	7	0.03	17	0.13	15	0.27	4	0.53	6	0.38
Csalog 1996		16	0.66	5	0.03	11	0.09	13	0.31	35	0.07	20	0.15
Czerny 1990		5	0.72	41	0.00	8	0.11	9	0.41	22	0.16	11	0.26
Ezaki 2006		23	0.63	39	0.00	22	0.06	21	0.15	45	0.05	26	0.09
Ferenczy 1958		32	0.60	13	0.01	12	0.08	14	0.29	28	0.08	18	0.15
Fliere 1977		24	0.63	27	0.00	6	0.09	12	0.34	32	0.08	17	0.16
Fou 1978		14	0.67	4	0.06	5	0.14	6	0.52	25	0.26	7	0.37
Francois 1956		46	0.50	28	0.00	49	0.07	34	0.07	38	0.07	39	0.07
Grinberg 1951		45	0.50	29	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.05	30	0.08	42	0.06
Hatto 1993		26	0.62	44	0.00	26	0.10	27	0.10	34	0.06	32	0.08
Hatto 1997		27	0.62	51	0.00	24	0.06	20	0.16	38	0.06	24	0.10
Indjic 2001		22	0.63	47	0.00	25	0.09	19	0.17	46	0.05	28	0.09
Jonas 1947		8	0.71	14	0.01	7	0.09	7	0.50	4	0.60	4	0.55
Kapell 1951		21	0.64	26	0.00	30	0.12	24	0.12	37	0.07	29	0.09
Kiepura 1999		39	0.55	49	0.00	40	0.05	41	0.05	29	0.09	34	0.07
Kushner 1989		19	0.65	19	0.00	21	0.07	26	0.11	42	0.06	31	0.08
Luisada 1991		33	0.60	31	0.00	41	0.05	46	0.05	22	0.18	27	0.09
Lushtak 2004		10	0.69	38	0.00	14	0.13	11	0.37	24	0.14	12	0.23
Magaloff 1978		49	0.48	17	0.01	27	0.10	28	0.10	48	0.05	35	0.07
Meguri 1997		6	0.72	6	0.03	4	0.19	4	0.61	31	0.07	14	0.21
Milkina 1970		12	0.68	8	0.02	15	0.15	8	0.43	33	0.07	16	0.17
Mohovich 1999		13	0.67	12	0.01	9	0.13	5	0.53	25	0.16	9	0.29
Niedzielski 1931		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ohlsson 1999		30	0.61	45	0.00	23	0.07	22	0.15	37	0.07	25	0.10
Olejniczak 1990		28	0.62	42	0.00	33	0.07	33	0.07	37	0.07	37	0.07
Osinska 1989		9	0.69	11	0.01	20	0.06	25	0.11	16	0.35	15	0.20
Rangell 2001		20	0.64	50	0.00	28	0.09	31	0.09	37	0.06	36	0.07
Richter 1976		43	0.51	24	0.00	37	0.05	47	0.05	37	0.07	44	0.06
Rubinstein 1938		35	0.59	40	0.00	44	0.05	39	0.05	43	0.05	49	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.59	18	0.01	45	0.04	48	0.04	35	0.06	51	0.05
Rubinstein 1961		29	0.61	34	0.00	46	0.06	36	0.06	26	0.10	33	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		34	0.60	30	0.00	47	0.05	45	0.05	27	0.09	38	0.07
Shebanova 2002		15	0.67	32	0.00	29	0.09	30	0.09	34	0.07	30	0.08
Smidowicz 1948		2	0.77	3	0.17	3	0.51	2	0.75	3	0.72	2	0.73
Smidowicz 1948b		1	0.79	2	0.21	2	0.31	1	0.77	2	0.73	1	0.75
Smith 1975		42	0.52	15	0.01	18	0.12	17	0.23	37	0.06	23	0.12
Sofronitsky 1949		48	0.50	36	0.00	48	0.05	38	0.05	45	0.06	47	0.05
Sztompka 1959		17	0.66	16	0.01	19	0.07	23	0.14	9	0.54	10	0.27
Tomsic 1995		41	0.53	35	0.00	13	0.09	18	0.23	23	0.20	13	0.21
Uninsky 1971		37	0.58	37	0.00	35	0.05	42	0.05	35	0.06	50	0.05
Wasowski 1980		3	0.76	1	0.31	1	0.31	3	0.70	1	0.64	3	0.67
Random 1		51	0.04	46	0.00	51	0.03	51	0.03	26	0.08	48	0.05
Random 2		50	0.09	48	0.00	50	0.03	50	0.03	3	0.47	22	0.12
Random 3		52	-0.05	52	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	41	0.05	52	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).