Czerny 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		40	0.66	46	0.00	37	0.05	39	0.05	11	0.40	31	0.14
Bacha 1997		15	0.74	8	0.02	9	0.10	10	0.40	9	0.56	5	0.47
Barbosa 1983		37	0.67	39	0.00	23	0.07	23	0.14	18	0.38	20	0.23
Biret 1990		18	0.73	10	0.02	16	0.10	15	0.34	5	0.52	9	0.42
Block 1995		48	0.57	7	0.02	43	0.05	44	0.05	8	0.48	29	0.15
Brailowsky 1960		36	0.67	47	0.00	40	0.05	48	0.05	26	0.09	40	0.07
Chiu 1999		30	0.70	6	0.03	34	0.05	42	0.05	26	0.08	44	0.06
Clidat 1994		26	0.71	20	0.01	31	0.07	29	0.07	46	0.05	45	0.06
Cohen 1997		38	0.67	52	0.00	45	0.07	26	0.07	30	0.09	38	0.08
Cortot 1951		39	0.67	28	0.01	33	0.06	34	0.06	8	0.49	26	0.17
Csalog 1996		25	0.71	42	0.00	32	0.06	37	0.06	36	0.06	49	0.06
Czerny 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ezaki 2006		16	0.74	30	0.00	6	0.09	9	0.41	18	0.29	16	0.34
Ferenczy 1958		20	0.73	24	0.01	15	0.10	11	0.40	29	0.08	24	0.18
Fliere 1977		32	0.69	14	0.01	13	0.11	20	0.22	21	0.22	21	0.22
Fou 1978		14	0.74	9	0.02	18	0.09	17	0.31	26	0.16	22	0.22
Francois 1956		49	0.46	49	0.00	49	0.06	31	0.06	24	0.13	36	0.09
Grinberg 1951		47	0.58	32	0.00	47	0.05	47	0.05	47	0.05	51	0.05
Hatto 1993		3	0.78	1	0.39	1	0.39	1	0.62	10	0.62	1	0.62
Hatto 1997		9	0.76	34	0.00	4	0.19	4	0.54	12	0.50	3	0.52
Indjic 2001		4	0.78	4	0.05	2	0.35	2	0.62	12	0.59	2	0.60
Jonas 1947		17	0.74	40	0.00	20	0.10	18	0.29	5	0.58	11	0.41
Kapell 1951		6	0.77	26	0.01	8	0.10	7	0.49	18	0.36	8	0.42
Kiepura 1999		45	0.61	13	0.01	41	0.05	41	0.05	22	0.22	34	0.10
Kushner 1989		29	0.70	16	0.01	25	0.06	25	0.11	40	0.06	37	0.08
Luisada 1991		42	0.63	12	0.01	36	0.05	45	0.05	8	0.44	28	0.15
Lushtak 2004		19	0.73	35	0.00	24	0.06	24	0.12	25	0.13	32	0.12
Magaloff 1978		43	0.62	41	0.00	44	0.06	36	0.06	49	0.05	50	0.05
Meguri 1997		1	0.79	2	0.10	3	0.29	3	0.59	9	0.41	4	0.49
Milkina 1970		13	0.74	36	0.00	27	0.07	27	0.07	40	0.06	48	0.06
Mohovich 1999		7	0.76	3	0.09	5	0.17	6	0.49	14	0.43	6	0.46
Niedzielski 1931		21	0.72	22	0.01	22	0.08	22	0.16	9	0.41	18	0.26
Ohlsson 1999		8	0.76	23	0.01	7	0.12	5	0.49	21	0.24	17	0.34
Olejniczak 1990		11	0.76	21	0.01	12	0.12	12	0.36	6	0.48	10	0.42
Osinska 1989		27	0.71	18	0.01	28	0.07	30	0.07	7	0.49	23	0.19
Rangell 2001		22	0.71	37	0.00	29	0.06	38	0.06	28	0.08	42	0.07
Richter 1976		46	0.58	31	0.00	48	0.06	32	0.06	32	0.08	41	0.07
Rubinstein 1938		28	0.70	50	0.00	30	0.06	33	0.06	13	0.42	27	0.16
Rubinstein 1952		24	0.71	11	0.02	35	0.07	28	0.07	17	0.31	30	0.15
Rubinstein 1961		10	0.76	5	0.04	17	0.13	16	0.32	7	0.52	12	0.41
Rubinstein 1966		12	0.75	27	0.01	19	0.10	19	0.28	7	0.53	15	0.39
Shebanova 2002		23	0.71	17	0.01	21	0.08	21	0.19	14	0.34	19	0.25
Smidowicz 1948		5	0.78	38	0.00	14	0.10	14	0.36	10	0.45	14	0.40
Smidowicz 1948b		2	0.79	25	0.01	10	0.12	8	0.44	7	0.49	7	0.46
Smith 1975		33	0.69	15	0.01	11	0.12	13	0.36	13	0.45	13	0.40
Sofronitsky 1949		44	0.61	43	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	30	0.07	46	0.06
Sztompka 1959		35	0.68	19	0.01	42	0.06	35	0.06	11	0.50	25	0.17
Tomsic 1995		41	0.65	33	0.00	39	0.05	46	0.05	25	0.12	39	0.08
Uninsky 1971		34	0.69	51	0.00	26	0.05	43	0.05	24	0.15	35	0.09
Wasowski 1980		31	0.69	29	0.00	38	0.05	40	0.05	31	0.08	43	0.06
Random 1		50	0.08	44	0.00	50	0.03	50	0.03	9	0.38	33	0.11
Random 2		51	0.01	45	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	28	0.06	52	0.03
Random 3		52	-0.03	48	0.00	51	0.02	51	0.02	18	0.18	47	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).