Random 1

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		50	0.00	65	0.00	61	0.04	58	0.04	88	0.02	55	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		66	-0.03	64	0.00	67	0.03	72	0.03	91	0.01	73	0.02
Ashkenazy 1981		15	0.05	79	0.00	29	0.06	30	0.26	85	0.03	20	0.09
Bacha 2000		72	-0.04	20	0.01	55	0.04	49	0.04	89	0.01	65	0.02
Badura 1965		57	-0.01	34	0.00	53	0.04	52	0.04	89	0.02	57	0.03
Barbosa 1983		13	0.06	8	0.04	9	0.11	10	0.44	86	0.02	19	0.09
Biret 1990		24	0.03	13	0.01	20	0.06	20	0.33	80	0.03	14	0.10
Blet 2003		11	0.06	18	0.01	35	0.06	33	0.23	88	0.01	42	0.05
Block 1995		56	-0.01	52	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.10	89	0.01	58	0.03
Blumental 1952		83	-0.07	39	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	89	0.02	60	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		78	-0.06	58	0.00	85	0.02	88	0.02	89	0.01	87	0.01
Brailowsky 1960		91	-0.16	89	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	91	0.01	81	0.01
Bunin 1987		62	-0.02	54	0.00	74	0.04	56	0.04	89	0.02	61	0.03
Bunin 1987b		63	-0.02	86	0.00	73	0.03	71	0.03	89	0.02	70	0.02
Chiu 1999		47	0.00	37	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	90	0.02	46	0.03
Cohen 1997		48	0.00	36	0.00	27	0.07	34	0.23	76	0.02	36	0.07
Cortot 1951		6	0.07	41	0.00	15	0.08	23	0.30	84	0.02	26	0.08
Csalog 1996		34	0.01	29	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.13	82	0.03	38	0.06
Czerny 1949		33	0.01	45	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.11	65	0.05	34	0.07
Czerny 1990		77	-0.05	56	0.00	76	0.03	75	0.03	89	0.02	79	0.02
Duchoud 2007		71	-0.04	80	0.00	69	0.03	67	0.03	89	0.02	78	0.02
Ezaki 2006		27	0.02	4	0.08	8	0.12	15	0.36	67	0.04	8	0.12
Falvay 1989		26	0.02	33	0.00	12	0.09	13	0.37	87	0.02	17	0.09
Farrell 1958		84	-0.07	53	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	90	0.01	67	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		76	-0.05	31	0.00	70	0.03	76	0.03	79	0.03	54	0.03
Fliere 1977		25	0.02	87	0.00	40	0.05	37	0.18	84	0.03	29	0.07
Fou 1978		60	-0.01	51	0.00	80	0.03	73	0.03	90	0.01	68	0.02
Francois 1956		68	-0.03	70	0.00	71	0.03	74	0.03	91	0.01	80	0.02
Friedman 1923		64	-0.02	76	0.00	65	0.04	51	0.04	85	0.03	64	0.03
Friedman 1923b		67	-0.03	81	0.00	64	0.03	68	0.03	85	0.03	62	0.03
Friedman 1930		61	-0.01	71	0.00	66	0.04	55	0.04	85	0.03	52	0.03
Garcia 2007		74	-0.04	62	0.00	39	0.06	40	0.14	88	0.02	43	0.05
Garcia 2007b		20	0.03	28	0.00	38	0.08	32	0.24	78	0.03	28	0.08
Gierzod 1998		38	0.00	35	0.00	62	0.04	64	0.04	90	0.02	56	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		39	0.00	43	0.00	34	0.07	25	0.29	71	0.03	21	0.09
Groot 1988		35	0.01	23	0.01	21	0.06	14	0.37	88	0.02	22	0.09
Harasiewicz 1955		70	-0.04	27	0.00	78	0.02	79	0.02	90	0.01	90	0.01
Hatto 1993		28	0.02	77	0.00	46	0.04	50	0.04	86	0.02	63	0.03
Hatto 1997		37	0.00	48	0.00	51	0.04	54	0.04	87	0.02	53	0.03
Horowitz 1949		89	-0.11	73	0.00	88	0.02	85	0.02	90	0.01	86	0.01
Indjic 1988		18	0.04	57	0.00	37	0.07	27	0.27	88	0.02	33	0.07
Kapell 1951		87	-0.10	59	0.00	86	0.02	89	0.02	90	0.01	85	0.01
Kissin 1993		1	0.11	5	0.06	4	0.19	2	0.56	76	0.05	4	0.17
Kushner 1989		51	0.00	63	0.00	24	0.05	36	0.20	89	0.02	37	0.06
Luisada 1991		9	0.07	24	0.01	31	0.07	22	0.32	87	0.02	24	0.08
Lushtak 2004		59	-0.01	25	0.00	25	0.06	41	0.14	90	0.01	44	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		41	0.00	72	0.00	52	0.04	60	0.04	89	0.02	48	0.03
Magaloff 1978		65	-0.02	90	0.00	48	0.05	46	0.05	90	0.02	47	0.03
Magin 1975		44	0.00	44	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.12	82	0.02	41	0.05
Michalowski 1933		49	0.00	66	0.00	57	0.03	66	0.03	86	0.03	50	0.03
Milkina 1970		46	0.00	7	0.04	22	0.06	35	0.22	83	0.02	31	0.07
Mohovich 1999		81	-0.06	67	0.00	82	0.02	84	0.02	91	0.01	88	0.01
Moravec 1969		52	0.00	50	0.00	30	0.06	21	0.32	89	0.02	23	0.08
Morozova 2008		53	-0.01	46	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	89	0.01	76	0.02
Neighaus 1950		7	0.07	14	0.01	10	0.09	8	0.46	86	0.02	15	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		82	-0.07	88	0.00	81	0.02	82	0.02	91	0.01	83	0.01
Ohlsson 1999		12	0.06	75	0.00	36	0.06	29	0.26	89	0.02	32	0.07
Osinska 1989		73	-0.04	82	0.00	50	0.04	57	0.04	90	0.01	66	0.02
Pachmann 1927		80	-0.06	26	0.00	68	0.03	77	0.03	90	0.01	72	0.02
Paderewski 1930		2	0.11	3	0.10	3	0.14	5	0.54	74	0.04	5	0.15
Perlemuter 1992		31	0.01	40	0.00	33	0.05	28	0.27	87	0.02	30	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008		30	0.01	17	0.01	16	0.08	18	0.35	84	0.02	25	0.08
Poblocka 1999		86	-0.09	83	0.00	89	0.02	86	0.02	91	0.01	82	0.01
Rabcewiczowa 1932		85	-0.09	49	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	91	0.01	84	0.01
Rachmaninoff 1923		40	0.00	78	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.14	90	0.02	40	0.05
Rangell 2001		90	-0.13	61	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	91	0.01	89	0.01
Richter 1976		79	-0.06	74	0.00	84	0.02	81	0.02	87	0.02	71	0.02
Rosen 1989		36	0.00	68	0.00	47	0.04	53	0.04	89	0.02	59	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		32	0.01	9	0.03	19	0.07	26	0.27	86	0.02	35	0.07
Rosenthal 1931		21	0.03	19	0.01	13	0.09	17	0.36	61	0.04	9	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b		17	0.04	15	0.01	14	0.11	16	0.36	72	0.03	16	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		23	0.03	30	0.00	26	0.06	19	0.33	87	0.02	27	0.08
Rosenthal 1931d		10	0.07	10	0.02	6	0.11	6	0.52	67	0.03	11	0.12
Rossi 2007		5	0.09	2	0.14	2	0.17	1	0.58	28	0.25	2	0.38
Rubinstein 1939		16	0.04	21	0.01	17	0.08	11	0.39	78	0.03	12	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		88	-0.10	42	0.00	83	0.02	83	0.02	91	0.01	91	0.01
Rubinstein 1966		75	-0.05	60	0.00	79	0.02	80	0.02	90	0.02	74	0.02
Schilhawsky 1960		69	-0.04	32	0.00	75	0.03	70	0.03	89	0.01	75	0.02
Shebanova 2002		8	0.07	38	0.00	11	0.08	9	0.45	86	0.03	10	0.12
Smith 1975		55	-0.01	22	0.01	28	0.08	31	0.25	72	0.04	13	0.10
Sokolov 2002		4	0.09	16	0.01	5	0.13	3	0.55	79	0.03	6	0.13
Sztompka 1959		22	0.03	84	0.00	23	0.05	12	0.37	86	0.02	18	0.09
Tomsic 1995		14	0.05	1	0.21	1	0.21	4	0.54	81	0.03	7	0.13
Uninsky 1932		43	0.00	12	0.02	32	0.06	38	0.17	89	0.02	39	0.06
Uninsky 1971		29	0.02	85	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	90	0.02	51	0.03
Wasowski 1980		58	-0.01	55	0.00	49	0.05	47	0.05	86	0.02	45	0.03
Zak 1937		42	0.00	69	0.00	59	0.03	65	0.03	88	0.02	69	0.02
Zak 1951		45	0.00	47	0.00	60	0.04	48	0.04	89	0.02	49	0.03
Average		54	-0.01	91	0.00	72	0.03	69	0.03	90	0.02	77	0.02
Random 1		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 2		19	0.03	11	0.02	18	0.06	24	0.29	33	0.22	3	0.25
Random 3		3	0.09	6	0.06	7	0.14	7	0.48	3	0.64	1	0.55

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).