Tsujii 2005

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		40	0.74	14	0.01	3	0.11	10	0.49	10	0.51	10	0.50
Ax 1995		58	0.68	29	0.00	45	0.04	63	0.04	15	0.35	45	0.12
Bacha 1998		49	0.71	27	0.00	49	0.05	47	0.05	36	0.10	58	0.07
Barbosa 1983		62	0.63	46	0.00	54	0.06	37	0.06	28	0.22	49	0.11
BenOr 1989		17	0.81	12	0.01	20	0.08	14	0.44	7	0.63	8	0.53
Biret 1990		2	0.83	8	0.01	6	0.16	3	0.61	6	0.59	4	0.60
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.69	50	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	33	0.14	57	0.07
Chiu 1999		45	0.73	7	0.01	46	0.04	59	0.04	26	0.16	55	0.08
Clidat 1994		51	0.70	43	0.00	39	0.05	44	0.05	22	0.42	37	0.14
Cohen 1997		64	0.61	47	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	12	0.51	39	0.14
Cortot 1951		50	0.71	31	0.00	55	0.06	39	0.06	2	0.54	34	0.18
Csalog 1996		22	0.80	37	0.00	29	0.06	26	0.25	20	0.39	24	0.31
Czerny 1989		47	0.72	64	0.00	47	0.04	61	0.04	25	0.34	44	0.12
Ezaki 2006		38	0.75	59	0.00	57	0.04	49	0.04	11	0.39	42	0.12
Falvay 1989		3	0.83	17	0.00	14	0.11	5	0.59	18	0.39	14	0.48
Fiorentino 1962		4	0.83	21	0.00	9	0.11	11	0.46	4	0.61	7	0.53
Fliere 1977		23	0.79	55	0.00	41	0.04	62	0.04	26	0.20	52	0.09
Fou 1978		43	0.73	32	0.00	21	0.09	25	0.27	21	0.24	32	0.25
Francois 1956		55	0.69	39	0.00	63	0.04	53	0.04	28	0.18	56	0.08
Goldenweiser 1946		52	0.70	25	0.00	50	0.04	48	0.04	17	0.30	47	0.11
Gornostaeva 1994		44	0.73	35	0.00	51	0.05	42	0.05	19	0.41	40	0.14
Groot 1988		5	0.82	22	0.00	15	0.08	18	0.39	28	0.18	31	0.26
Hatto 1993		30	0.78	30	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.05	39	0.08	61	0.06
Hatto 1997		32	0.78	16	0.01	37	0.06	36	0.06	32	0.13	53	0.09
Horszowski 1983		60	0.67	67	0.00	48	0.04	57	0.04	53	0.05	64	0.04
Indjic 2001		27	0.78	56	0.00	42	0.04	54	0.04	45	0.07	63	0.05
Katin 1996		7	0.82	11	0.01	30	0.08	23	0.28	21	0.32	26	0.30
Kiepura 1999		63	0.63	62	0.00	60	0.04	52	0.04	24	0.21	51	0.09
Korecka 1992		41	0.74	48	0.00	53	0.04	50	0.04	23	0.29	48	0.11
Kushner 1990		48	0.71	20	0.00	18	0.08	21	0.31	10	0.55	18	0.41
Lilamand 2001		59	0.67	65	0.00	59	0.04	64	0.04	19	0.30	50	0.11
Luisada 1990		6	0.82	5	0.01	2	0.36	2	0.66	5	0.60	3	0.63
Luisada 2008		35	0.76	41	0.00	25	0.07	22	0.29	24	0.23	29	0.26
Lushtak 2004		18	0.81	60	0.00	16	0.08	15	0.42	7	0.57	13	0.49
Malcuzynski 1951		61	0.65	19	0.00	36	0.06	38	0.06	19	0.25	46	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		53	0.70	49	0.00	38	0.07	35	0.07	49	0.06	60	0.06
Magaloff 1977		11	0.81	24	0.00	22	0.08	19	0.35	5	0.57	16	0.45
Magin 1975		33	0.78	44	0.00	23	0.08	28	0.25	18	0.32	28	0.28
Meguri 1997		25	0.79	53	0.00	33	0.11	31	0.21	5	0.62	21	0.36
Milkina 1970		39	0.75	52	0.00	52	0.04	51	0.04	32	0.10	59	0.06
Mohovich 1999		29	0.78	9	0.01	28	0.06	27	0.25	21	0.28	30	0.26
Nezu 2005		20	0.80	2	0.03	7	0.12	8	0.52	4	0.60	6	0.56
Ohlsson 1999		21	0.80	6	0.01	19	0.08	24	0.28	23	0.32	27	0.30
Olejniczak 1990		14	0.81	36	0.00	32	0.09	30	0.23	16	0.43	25	0.31
Osinska 1989		9	0.82	28	0.00	11	0.12	9	0.50	15	0.32	19	0.40
Perlemuter 1992		42	0.73	54	0.00	61	0.05	45	0.05	15	0.28	43	0.12
Poblocka 1999		10	0.82	63	0.00	24	0.07	16	0.42	20	0.33	20	0.37
Rangell 2001		19	0.80	13	0.01	31	0.09	29	0.24	1	0.80	17	0.44
Richter 1960		26	0.79	4	0.01	34	0.07	34	0.07	16	0.36	36	0.16
Richter 1961		57	0.68	57	0.00	62	0.05	46	0.05	32	0.14	54	0.08
Rosen 1989		13	0.81	38	0.00	17	0.08	17	0.42	6	0.60	9	0.50
Rubinstein 1939		24	0.79	51	0.00	10	0.10	13	0.46	10	0.53	11	0.49
Rubinstein 1952		37	0.76	34	0.00	13	0.10	20	0.35	18	0.30	23	0.32
Rubinstein 1966		8	0.82	33	0.00	5	0.14	6	0.58	12	0.41	12	0.49
Rudanovskaya 2007		31	0.78	40	0.00	40	0.04	56	0.04	10	0.51	38	0.14
Shebanova 2002		12	0.81	3	0.01	8	0.11	4	0.60	8	0.58	5	0.59
Smith 1975		28	0.78	26	0.00	44	0.04	55	0.04	13	0.45	41	0.13
Sztompka 1959		54	0.70	61	0.00	64	0.05	41	0.05	50	0.05	62	0.05
Tanyel 1992		15	0.81	15	0.01	4	0.12	7	0.56	1	0.83	2	0.68
Tsujii 2005		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Uninsky 1959		16	0.81	23	0.00	12	0.09	12	0.46	11	0.47	15	0.46
Vardi 1988		46	0.72	10	0.01	27	0.07	33	0.17	2	0.66	22	0.33
Wasowski 1980		36	0.76	18	0.00	26	0.08	32	0.18	22	0.33	33	0.24
Zimerman 1975		34	0.77	42	0.00	35	0.05	40	0.05	11	0.56	35	0.17
Average		1	0.91	1	0.80	1	0.79	1	0.89	8	0.60	1	0.73
Random 1		67	-0.04	58	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	55	0.03	67	0.02
Random 2		66	0.02	66	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	37	0.06	65	0.03
Random 3		65	0.03	45	0.00	65	0.03	65	0.03	51	0.03	66	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).