Richter 1961

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		32	0.65	39	0.00	28	0.07	30	0.19	63	0.04	32	0.09
Ax 1995		34	0.64	30	0.00	20	0.08	24	0.36	36	0.06	20	0.15
Bacha 1998		15	0.71	4	0.03	2	0.16	10	0.50	17	0.37	6	0.43
Barbosa 1983		59	0.53	33	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	58	0.05	46	0.05
BenOr 1989		47	0.59	47	0.00	54	0.03	61	0.03	52	0.05	58	0.04
Biret 1990		3	0.77	11	0.01	7	0.12	3	0.70	32	0.16	11	0.33
Brailowsky 1960		26	0.67	15	0.01	24	0.12	23	0.38	25	0.22	13	0.29
Chiu 1999		35	0.62	23	0.00	50	0.04	53	0.04	60	0.04	49	0.04
Clidat 1994		24	0.68	13	0.01	15	0.10	9	0.51	28	0.35	7	0.42
Cohen 1997		42	0.60	50	0.00	39	0.08	37	0.08	20	0.32	18	0.16
Cortot 1951		49	0.58	36	0.00	48	0.09	35	0.09	58	0.04	40	0.06
Csalog 1996		41	0.61	10	0.01	35	0.06	43	0.06	64	0.03	53	0.04
Czerny 1989		40	0.61	24	0.00	37	0.08	38	0.08	51	0.05	35	0.06
Ezaki 2006		45	0.59	66	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.03	61	0.03
Falvay 1989		5	0.75	25	0.00	10	0.23	13	0.49	60	0.04	22	0.14
Fiorentino 1962		8	0.74	2	0.09	4	0.12	14	0.49	28	0.21	12	0.32
Fliere 1977		7	0.75	12	0.01	12	0.17	6	0.57	23	0.25	8	0.38
Fou 1978		46	0.59	38	0.00	38	0.07	42	0.07	64	0.03	43	0.05
Francois 1956		36	0.62	42	0.00	32	0.06	33	0.12	42	0.06	34	0.08
Goldenweiser 1946		62	0.41	41	0.00	63	0.05	52	0.05	56	0.04	48	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		38	0.61	43	0.00	44	0.09	34	0.09	54	0.04	39	0.06
Groot 1988		12	0.72	9	0.01	26	0.10	26	0.34	49	0.06	27	0.14
Hatto 1993		17	0.69	31	0.00	25	0.10	25	0.35	48	0.06	28	0.14
Hatto 1997		30	0.66	27	0.00	30	0.11	29	0.25	38	0.08	24	0.14
Horszowski 1983		56	0.55	7	0.01	41	0.07	41	0.07	64	0.03	41	0.05
Indjic 2001		25	0.68	28	0.00	29	0.10	28	0.27	52	0.05	30	0.12
Katin 1996		10	0.73	40	0.00	18	0.11	18	0.44	39	0.07	17	0.18
Kiepura 1999		43	0.60	14	0.01	16	0.10	20	0.41	5	0.56	5	0.48
Korecka 1992		20	0.69	21	0.00	13	0.13	11	0.50	22	0.29	9	0.38
Kushner 1990		61	0.46	64	0.00	58	0.04	54	0.04	45	0.05	51	0.04
Lilamand 2001		64	0.35	46	0.00	64	0.04	59	0.04	64	0.02	64	0.03
Luisada 1990		18	0.69	52	0.00	21	0.10	15	0.46	53	0.04	26	0.14
Luisada 2008		16	0.70	22	0.00	19	0.09	21	0.39	53	0.05	25	0.14
Lushtak 2004		11	0.72	5	0.03	5	0.13	12	0.50	27	0.22	10	0.33
Malcuzynski 1951		63	0.39	56	0.00	62	0.03	62	0.03	58	0.04	65	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		53	0.57	35	0.00	46	0.07	40	0.07	63	0.04	45	0.05
Magaloff 1977		51	0.58	51	0.00	59	0.06	46	0.06	62	0.04	47	0.05
Magin 1975		29	0.66	17	0.00	22	0.10	22	0.39	51	0.05	23	0.14
Meguri 1997		58	0.55	55	0.00	60	0.04	55	0.04	63	0.04	52	0.04
Milkina 1970		37	0.62	32	0.00	43	0.06	44	0.06	61	0.04	44	0.05
Mohovich 1999		6	0.75	3	0.07	3	0.14	4	0.67	17	0.41	3	0.52
Nezu 2005		31	0.65	54	0.00	36	0.06	45	0.06	63	0.03	56	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		14	0.71	18	0.00	27	0.13	27	0.31	50	0.05	29	0.12
Olejniczak 1990		22	0.68	19	0.00	31	0.08	31	0.19	46	0.05	31	0.10
Osinska 1989		19	0.69	65	0.00	14	0.11	19	0.42	52	0.05	21	0.14
Perlemuter 1992		60	0.53	26	0.00	52	0.04	56	0.04	61	0.03	62	0.03
Poblocka 1999		13	0.71	29	0.00	17	0.11	16	0.45	38	0.07	15	0.18
Rangell 2001		50	0.58	44	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	61	0.04	59	0.04
Richter 1960		1	0.81	1	0.60	1	0.59	1	0.78	2	0.65	1	0.71
Richter 1961		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosen 1989		44	0.60	49	0.00	51	0.05	51	0.05	62	0.03	57	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		28	0.67	20	0.00	23	0.12	17	0.45	34	0.07	16	0.18
Rubinstein 1952		57	0.55	48	0.00	55	0.03	64	0.03	53	0.05	60	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		9	0.74	45	0.00	11	0.17	7	0.56	37	0.07	14	0.20
Rudanovskaya 2007		27	0.67	37	0.00	42	0.06	47	0.06	37	0.06	37	0.06
Shebanova 2002		52	0.57	59	0.00	57	0.04	57	0.04	62	0.04	54	0.04
Smith 1975		55	0.56	16	0.01	61	0.03	63	0.03	63	0.04	63	0.03
Sztompka 1959		39	0.61	60	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	61	0.03	50	0.04
Tanyel 1992		54	0.57	34	0.00	40	0.05	49	0.05	55	0.04	55	0.04
Tsujii 2005		21	0.68	57	0.00	33	0.07	32	0.14	46	0.05	33	0.08
Uninsky 1959		33	0.64	62	0.00	34	0.08	36	0.08	58	0.04	36	0.06
Vardi 1988		23	0.68	53	0.00	6	0.11	8	0.53	12	0.53	2	0.53
Wasowski 1980		48	0.58	63	0.00	47	0.07	39	0.07	60	0.04	42	0.05
Zimerman 1975		4	0.76	8	0.01	8	0.14	5	0.59	19	0.45	4	0.52
Average		2	0.77	6	0.03	9	0.20	2	0.71	64	0.03	19	0.15
Random 1		67	0.00	61	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	27	0.19	38	0.06
Random 2		66	0.01	58	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	50	0.03	66	0.02
Random 3		65	0.01	67	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	65	0.02	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).