Random 3

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   25  0.0732  0.0052  0.0356  0.0365  0.0355  0.03
Ax 1995   10  0.097  0.0412  0.1114  0.3965  0.0317  0.11
Bacha 1998   14  0.0816  0.0135  0.0535  0.0565  0.0338  0.04
Barbosa 1983   15  0.0851  0.0026  0.0822  0.2765  0.0322  0.09
BenOr 1989   48  0.0556  0.0025  0.0727  0.1966  0.0234  0.06
Biret 1990   34  0.0623  0.0146  0.0537  0.0564  0.0341  0.04
Brailowsky 1960   33  0.0654  0.0038  0.0447  0.0465  0.0344  0.03
Chiu 1999   65  0.0150  0.0062  0.0353  0.0365  0.0260  0.02
Clidat 1994   32  0.069  0.0329  0.0732  0.1560  0.0331  0.07
Cohen 1997   52  0.0325  0.0163  0.0357  0.0364  0.0356  0.03
Cortot 1951   62  0.0127  0.0161  0.0358  0.0366  0.0264  0.02
Csalog 1996   26  0.0755  0.0040  0.0540  0.0565  0.0339  0.04
Czerny 1989   9  0.0953  0.0018  0.0713  0.4065  0.0313  0.11
Ezaki 2006   40  0.0519  0.0137  0.0445  0.0465  0.0343  0.03
Falvay 1989   55  0.0260  0.0056  0.0363  0.0365  0.0345  0.03
Fiorentino 1962   50  0.0335  0.0055  0.0354  0.0366  0.0263  0.02
Fliere 1977   27  0.0747  0.0014  0.0715  0.3862  0.0311  0.11
Fou 1978   17  0.0831  0.0121  0.0820  0.3065  0.0321  0.09
Francois 1956   29  0.0739  0.0039  0.0538  0.0558  0.0342  0.04
Goldenweiser 1946   43  0.0537  0.0028  0.0728  0.1865  0.0328  0.07
Gornostaeva 1994   11  0.0836  0.0022  0.0823  0.2664  0.0324  0.09
Groot 1988   37  0.0548  0.0024  0.0625  0.2562  0.0325  0.09
Hatto 1993   56  0.0265  0.0050  0.0446  0.0465  0.0257  0.03
Hatto 1997   60  0.0161  0.0057  0.0361  0.0365  0.0261  0.02
Horszowski 1983   3  0.104  0.084  0.132  0.5263  0.041  0.14
Indjic 2001   59  0.0263  0.0048  0.0448  0.0465  0.0253  0.03
Katin 1996   22  0.0713  0.029  0.1110  0.4461  0.045  0.13
Kiepura 1999   44  0.0541  0.0054  0.0359  0.0366  0.0258  0.02
Korecka 1992   21  0.0712  0.0215  0.0712  0.4065  0.0312  0.11
Kushner 1990   2  0.113  0.103  0.1111  0.4365  0.0315  0.11
Lilamand 2001   19  0.0711  0.0313  0.0821  0.2763  0.0323  0.09
Luisada 1990   20  0.0742  0.0030  0.0729  0.1865  0.0332  0.07
Luisada 2008   1  0.115  0.0610  0.117  0.4760  0.044  0.14
Lushtak 2004   38  0.0559  0.0045  0.0449  0.0465  0.0250  0.03
Malcuzynski 1951   8  0.0917  0.0123  0.0924  0.2665  0.0326  0.09
Malcuzynski 1961   12  0.0820  0.018  0.109  0.4565  0.0310  0.12
Magaloff 1977   30  0.0762  0.0032  0.0730  0.1565  0.0330  0.07
Magin 1975   7  0.096  0.065  0.115  0.4964  0.038  0.12
Meguri 1997   53  0.0322  0.0151  0.0444  0.0464  0.0347  0.03
Milkina 1970   23  0.0710  0.036  0.106  0.4765  0.039  0.12
Mohovich 1999   46  0.0557  0.0044  0.0450  0.0465  0.0354  0.03
Nezu 2005   45  0.0544  0.0033  0.0633  0.1160  0.0433  0.07
Ohlsson 1999   4  0.108  0.047  0.113  0.5261  0.043  0.14
Olejniczak 1990   64  0.0129  0.0149  0.0352  0.0365  0.0265  0.02
Osinska 1989   24  0.0745  0.0027  0.0626  0.2165  0.0327  0.08
Perlemuter 1992   42  0.0533  0.0042  0.0536  0.0563  0.0336  0.04
Poblocka 1999   31  0.0726  0.0120  0.0818  0.3663  0.0318  0.10
Rangell 2001   66  -0.0364  0.0066  0.0266  0.0267  0.0167  0.01
Richter 1960   47  0.0534  0.0047  0.0542  0.0565  0.0248  0.03
Richter 1961   61  0.0166  0.0065  0.0265  0.0266  0.0259  0.02
Rosen 1989   58  0.0243  0.0058  0.0364  0.0363  0.0352  0.03
Rubinstein 1939   6  0.1028  0.0111  0.128  0.4665  0.037  0.12
Rubinstein 1952   18  0.0838  0.0016  0.0719  0.3465  0.0320  0.10
Rubinstein 1966   13  0.081  0.151  0.151  0.5463  0.036  0.13
Rudanovskaya 2007   57  0.0215  0.0153  0.0355  0.0365  0.0349  0.03
Shebanova 2002   49  0.0549  0.0031  0.0631  0.1565  0.0329  0.07
Smith 1975   41  0.0514  0.0141  0.0541  0.0565  0.0337  0.04
Sztompka 1959   35  0.0540  0.0043  0.0539  0.0565  0.0246  0.03
Tanyel 1992   51  0.0352  0.0060  0.0360  0.0366  0.0262  0.02
Tsujii 2005   54  0.0346  0.0059  0.0351  0.0365  0.0351  0.03
Uninsky 1959   16  0.082  0.132  0.174  0.5162  0.042  0.14
Vardi 1988   5  0.1030  0.0117  0.0616  0.3764  0.0314  0.11
Wasowski 1980   36  0.0558  0.0036  0.0543  0.0565  0.0335  0.04
Zimerman 1975   39  0.0524  0.0134  0.0534  0.0565  0.0340  0.04
Average   28  0.0767  0.0019  0.0817  0.3760  0.0316  0.11
Random 1   67  -0.0618  0.0167  0.0167  0.0167  0.0166  0.01
Random 2   63  0.0121  0.0164  0.0362  0.0316  0.3219  0.10
Random 3   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).