Average

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		42	0.82	16	0.01	9	0.13	13	0.51	1	0.84	15	0.65
Ax 1995		53	0.77	32	0.00	47	0.07	40	0.07	1	0.74	42	0.23
Bacha 1998		39	0.82	62	0.00	39	0.07	39	0.07	1	0.80	37	0.24
Barbosa 1983		60	0.72	45	0.00	40	0.08	35	0.08	1	0.80	35	0.25
BenOr 1989		26	0.85	51	0.00	38	0.07	36	0.07	1	0.87	36	0.25
Biret 1990		6	0.90	23	0.00	10	0.16	6	0.63	1	0.88	6	0.74
Brailowsky 1960		52	0.78	56	0.00	49	0.05	52	0.05	1	0.78	48	0.20
Chiu 1999		40	0.82	41	0.00	50	0.05	54	0.05	1	0.78	49	0.20
Clidat 1994		48	0.79	18	0.01	37	0.07	38	0.07	1	0.85	39	0.24
Cohen 1997		64	0.65	35	0.00	64	0.05	49	0.05	4	0.60	58	0.17
Cortot 1951		58	0.75	57	0.00	59	0.03	63	0.03	1	0.71	63	0.15
Csalog 1996		22	0.87	7	0.03	23	0.08	26	0.22	1	0.87	26	0.44
Czerny 1989		44	0.81	39	0.00	31	0.08	30	0.17	1	0.85	30	0.38
Ezaki 2006		46	0.81	37	0.00	55	0.05	50	0.05	1	0.71	52	0.19
Falvay 1989		1	0.91	3	0.14	3	0.17	1	0.76	1	0.92	1	0.84
Fiorentino 1962		20	0.88	52	0.00	36	0.06	44	0.06	1	0.84	45	0.22
Fliere 1977		14	0.88	30	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.16	1	0.83	31	0.36
Fou 1978		38	0.83	8	0.03	11	0.10	22	0.36	1	0.79	23	0.53
Francois 1956		59	0.75	63	0.00	63	0.05	51	0.05	1	0.57	59	0.17
Goldenweiser 1946		57	0.76	44	0.00	44	0.06	46	0.06	1	0.80	43	0.22
Gornostaeva 1994		41	0.82	49	0.00	45	0.07	37	0.07	1	0.81	40	0.24
Groot 1988		2	0.91	4	0.05	4	0.13	5	0.64	1	0.87	5	0.75
Hatto 1993		9	0.89	19	0.00	18	0.14	9	0.56	3	0.90	10	0.71
Hatto 1997		13	0.88	9	0.02	14	0.12	7	0.60	3	0.90	7	0.73
Horszowski 1983		49	0.79	31	0.00	29	0.09	28	0.20	1	0.80	28	0.40
Indjic 2001		10	0.89	28	0.00	20	0.13	11	0.54	3	0.90	11	0.70
Katin 1996		11	0.89	27	0.00	25	0.09	21	0.38	1	0.89	21	0.58
Kiepura 1999		63	0.70	60	0.00	60	0.03	61	0.03	2	0.67	64	0.14
Korecka 1992		37	0.83	50	0.00	46	0.05	48	0.05	1	0.77	50	0.20
Kushner 1990		55	0.76	58	0.00	34	0.06	45	0.06	1	0.80	44	0.22
Lilamand 2001		62	0.72	36	0.00	56	0.03	62	0.03	2	0.71	62	0.15
Luisada 1990		8	0.89	1	0.24	1	0.23	3	0.72	1	0.91	3	0.81
Luisada 2008		23	0.86	61	0.00	17	0.10	23	0.35	1	0.87	22	0.55
Lushtak 2004		15	0.88	10	0.02	24	0.08	20	0.39	1	0.89	20	0.59
Malcuzynski 1951		61	0.72	53	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.07	1	0.71	46	0.22
Malcuzynski 1961		34	0.84	24	0.00	6	0.13	10	0.56	1	0.89	9	0.71
Magaloff 1977		24	0.86	46	0.00	41	0.10	34	0.10	1	0.84	34	0.29
Magin 1975		17	0.88	13	0.01	12	0.11	15	0.49	1	0.86	14	0.65
Meguri 1997		43	0.82	59	0.00	54	0.04	59	0.04	1	0.71	56	0.17
Milkina 1970		32	0.84	40	0.00	35	0.07	43	0.07	1	0.84	38	0.24
Mohovich 1999		25	0.86	25	0.00	28	0.08	25	0.26	1	0.84	25	0.47
Nezu 2005		21	0.87	43	0.00	27	0.08	24	0.29	1	0.83	24	0.49
Ohlsson 1999		12	0.89	17	0.01	21	0.13	16	0.47	1	0.82	16	0.62
Olejniczak 1990		16	0.88	47	0.00	26	0.08	29	0.18	1	0.84	29	0.39
Osinska 1989		4	0.91	11	0.02	7	0.15	4	0.66	1	0.86	4	0.75
Perlemuter 1992		50	0.78	64	0.00	58	0.03	65	0.03	1	0.71	60	0.15
Poblocka 1999		7	0.90	33	0.00	15	0.10	12	0.52	1	0.86	12	0.67
Rangell 2001		51	0.78	34	0.00	61	0.04	58	0.04	2	0.80	55	0.18
Richter 1960		33	0.84	20	0.00	43	0.07	41	0.07	1	0.73	41	0.23
Richter 1961		54	0.77	29	0.00	57	0.03	64	0.03	2	0.71	61	0.15
Rosen 1989		30	0.85	54	0.00	33	0.07	33	0.14	1	0.75	33	0.32
Rubinstein 1939		27	0.85	21	0.00	16	0.10	18	0.45	1	0.84	18	0.61
Rubinstein 1952		28	0.85	14	0.01	5	0.12	17	0.46	1	0.83	17	0.62
Rubinstein 1966		5	0.91	2	0.23	2	0.37	2	0.74	1	0.90	2	0.82
Rudanovskaya 2007		45	0.81	38	0.00	62	0.04	57	0.04	1	0.73	57	0.17
Shebanova 2002		19	0.88	15	0.01	19	0.12	14	0.51	1	0.85	13	0.66
Smith 1975		35	0.84	26	0.00	48	0.05	56	0.05	2	0.74	53	0.19
Sztompka 1959		36	0.83	55	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	2	0.72	47	0.21
Tanyel 1992		47	0.80	42	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	2	0.81	51	0.20
Tsujii 2005		3	0.91	12	0.02	8	0.14	8	0.60	1	0.89	8	0.73
Uninsky 1959		18	0.88	5	0.04	13	0.10	19	0.44	1	0.83	19	0.60
Vardi 1988		56	0.76	22	0.00	52	0.05	53	0.05	1	0.76	54	0.19
Wasowski 1980		31	0.84	48	0.00	30	0.07	27	0.20	1	0.86	27	0.41
Zimerman 1975		29	0.85	6	0.03	22	0.08	32	0.14	1	0.82	32	0.34
Average		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 1		67	-0.01	65	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	34	0.06	66	0.03
Random 2		66	0.02	67	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	40	0.06	67	0.02
Random 3		65	0.07	66	0.00	65	0.03	60	0.03	17	0.37	65	0.11

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).