Tsujii 2005

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.31	3	0.01	5	0.24	6	0.56	4	0.70	6	0.63
Ax 1995		50	0.54	21	0.00	9	0.23	9	0.53	3	0.73	8	0.62
Bacha 1998		57	0.50	22	0.00	59	0.03	64	0.03	32	0.13	59	0.06
Barbosa 1983		63	0.40	33	0.00	35	0.06	42	0.06	31	0.18	54	0.10
BenOr 1989		24	0.64	18	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.11	21	0.42	33	0.21
Biret 1990		19	0.65	31	0.00	17	0.12	15	0.42	8	0.62	12	0.51
Brailowsky 1960		60	0.47	38	0.00	60	0.04	61	0.04	33	0.18	57	0.08
Chiu 1999		46	0.56	23	0.00	50	0.05	50	0.05	46	0.06	63	0.05
Clidat 1994		49	0.54	41	0.00	36	0.06	46	0.06	15	0.47	37	0.17
Cohen 1997		62	0.43	39	0.00	54	0.04	62	0.04	12	0.58	41	0.15
Cortot 1951		21	0.65	27	0.00	44	0.07	37	0.07	8	0.47	36	0.18
Csalog 1996		9	0.68	49	0.00	12	0.10	8	0.53	23	0.44	16	0.48
Czerny 1989		42	0.58	61	0.00	34	0.07	39	0.07	24	0.31	40	0.15
Ezaki 2006		26	0.63	60	0.00	10	0.11	14	0.43	6	0.57	13	0.50
Falvay 1989		15	0.67	16	0.00	18	0.13	13	0.44	36	0.10	32	0.21
Fiorentino 1962		29	0.62	43	0.00	29	0.06	31	0.15	17	0.44	30	0.26
Fliere 1977		38	0.59	53	0.00	46	0.06	44	0.06	20	0.30	47	0.13
Fou 1978		31	0.61	19	0.00	39	0.07	36	0.07	21	0.30	44	0.14
Francois 1956		45	0.57	56	0.00	61	0.05	55	0.05	21	0.48	42	0.15
Goldenweiser 1946		35	0.60	26	0.00	49	0.05	54	0.05	36	0.07	58	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.45	42	0.00	62	0.04	59	0.04	29	0.25	55	0.10
Groot 1988		34	0.60	57	0.00	38	0.06	41	0.06	28	0.20	50	0.11
Hatto 1993		14	0.67	40	0.00	27	0.07	22	0.29	14	0.49	22	0.38
Hatto 1997		13	0.67	14	0.00	28	0.08	23	0.27	12	0.51	24	0.37
Horszowski 1983		58	0.50	67	0.00	56	0.05	52	0.05	38	0.06	62	0.05
Indjic 2001		8	0.69	58	0.00	30	0.07	29	0.16	13	0.47	28	0.27
Katin 1996		4	0.70	11	0.00	20	0.08	21	0.32	19	0.42	23	0.37
Kiepura 1999		55	0.53	63	0.00	51	0.05	58	0.05	25	0.27	48	0.12
Korecka 1992		41	0.58	45	0.00	57	0.04	60	0.04	19	0.49	45	0.14
Kushner 1990		52	0.53	47	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	35	0.08	61	0.06
Lilamand 2001		44	0.57	64	0.00	47	0.06	45	0.06	27	0.35	46	0.14
Luisada 1990		11	0.67	13	0.00	4	0.24	4	0.69	2	0.73	4	0.71
Luisada 2008		56	0.52	65	0.00	40	0.07	38	0.07	11	0.44	35	0.18
Lushtak 2004		37	0.59	54	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.13	23	0.28	34	0.19
Malcuzynski 1951		47	0.56	20	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	9	0.54	39	0.16
Malcuzynski 1961		39	0.58	30	0.00	48	0.06	47	0.06	50	0.06	60	0.06
Magaloff 1977		18	0.65	36	0.00	19	0.08	18	0.37	3	0.68	15	0.50
Magin 1975		20	0.65	8	0.01	6	0.16	5	0.59	3	0.64	9	0.61
Meguri 1997		12	0.67	62	0.00	24	0.07	25	0.24	4	0.69	20	0.41
Milkina 1970		23	0.64	59	0.00	45	0.08	34	0.08	30	0.12	53	0.10
Mohovich 1999		32	0.61	9	0.01	43	0.07	40	0.07	27	0.22	49	0.12
Nezu 2005		2	0.75	2	0.06	2	0.29	2	0.72	2	0.84	1	0.78
Ohlsson 1999		25	0.64	25	0.00	14	0.12	12	0.47	4	0.69	10	0.57
Olejniczak 1990		43	0.58	52	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	42	0.05	65	0.05
Osinska 1989		6	0.70	24	0.00	26	0.08	24	0.24	17	0.47	25	0.34
Perlemuter 1992		48	0.56	34	0.00	63	0.05	51	0.05	21	0.41	43	0.14
Poblocka 1999		17	0.65	29	0.00	31	0.08	30	0.16	21	0.42	29	0.26
Rangell 2001		3	0.71	5	0.01	3	0.26	3	0.70	4	0.78	3	0.74
Richter 1960		7	0.69	6	0.01	11	0.11	11	0.49	7	0.67	11	0.57
Richter 1961		51	0.53	50	0.00	52	0.05	49	0.05	33	0.19	52	0.10
Rosen 1989		10	0.67	48	0.00	25	0.07	26	0.22	10	0.68	21	0.39
Rubinstein 1939		22	0.64	55	0.00	13	0.10	17	0.38	4	0.65	14	0.50
Rubinstein 1952		54	0.53	32	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.06	32	0.19	51	0.11
Rubinstein 1966		27	0.63	28	0.00	15	0.13	16	0.41	13	0.48	18	0.44
Rudanovskaya 2007		5	0.70	35	0.00	23	0.08	28	0.18	14	0.42	27	0.27
Shebanova 2002		28	0.63	4	0.01	16	0.13	19	0.35	15	0.52	19	0.43
Smith 1975		33	0.60	7	0.01	22	0.07	27	0.20	19	0.42	26	0.29
Sztompka 1959		59	0.47	66	0.00	64	0.03	63	0.03	45	0.06	66	0.04
Tanyel 1992		30	0.62	10	0.01	7	0.16	7	0.55	3	0.80	5	0.66
Tsujii 2005		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Uninsky 1959		16	0.66	17	0.00	21	0.07	20	0.34	9	0.57	17	0.44
Vardi 1988		36	0.60	12	0.00	8	0.19	10	0.53	3	0.72	7	0.62
Wasowski 1980		40	0.58	15	0.00	41	0.07	35	0.07	4	0.69	31	0.22
Zimerman 1975		53	0.53	46	0.00	37	0.06	48	0.06	17	0.49	38	0.17
Average		1	0.85	1	0.81	1	0.80	1	0.91	3	0.65	2	0.77
Random 1		66	0.02	44	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	21	0.14	64	0.05
Random 2		65	0.07	51	0.00	65	0.03	65	0.03	24	0.25	56	0.09
Random 3		67	-0.04	37	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	57	0.03	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).