Sztompka 1959

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.09	26	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.15	57	0.05	36	0.09
Ax 1995		46	0.43	4	0.11	9	0.15	17	0.46	21	0.37	11	0.41
Bacha 1998		21	0.51	37	0.00	30	0.07	29	0.18	20	0.30	18	0.23
Barbosa 1983		45	0.44	3	0.12	3	0.19	8	0.59	16	0.55	4	0.57
BenOr 1989		52	0.40	53	0.00	55	0.05	57	0.05	56	0.04	57	0.04
Biret 1990		41	0.45	46	0.00	29	0.07	30	0.18	54	0.04	37	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		8	0.59	5	0.10	4	0.20	3	0.71	2	0.78	1	0.74
Chiu 1999		12	0.54	30	0.00	10	0.13	9	0.57	17	0.37	8	0.46
Clidat 1994		39	0.46	56	0.00	25	0.13	21	0.37	27	0.25	15	0.30
Cohen 1997		63	0.22	55	0.00	66	0.02	65	0.02	67	0.01	67	0.01
Cortot 1951		19	0.52	47	0.00	49	0.09	35	0.09	59	0.04	45	0.06
Csalog 1996		9	0.59	39	0.00	15	0.14	13	0.52	39	0.07	20	0.19
Czerny 1989		32	0.48	14	0.01	20	0.12	20	0.37	41	0.06	25	0.15
Ezaki 2006		17	0.52	15	0.01	22	0.09	24	0.35	46	0.05	29	0.13
Falvay 1989		6	0.60	8	0.03	13	0.12	12	0.53	51	0.05	23	0.16
Fiorentino 1962		16	0.52	67	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.17	42	0.07	34	0.11
Fliere 1977		23	0.51	25	0.00	21	0.10	25	0.34	29	0.17	17	0.24
Fou 1978		5	0.60	11	0.02	14	0.13	11	0.54	24	0.24	14	0.36
Francois 1956		43	0.44	43	0.00	41	0.06	50	0.06	22	0.44	24	0.16
Goldenweiser 1946		3	0.63	2	0.13	2	0.16	2	0.74	6	0.63	2	0.68
Gornostaeva 1994		53	0.39	33	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.06	39	0.07	44	0.06
Groot 1988		42	0.45	62	0.00	51	0.05	59	0.05	63	0.03	59	0.04
Hatto 1993		34	0.48	54	0.00	44	0.07	37	0.07	36	0.08	39	0.07
Hatto 1997		36	0.48	28	0.00	38	0.06	52	0.06	40	0.06	40	0.06
Horszowski 1983		47	0.43	12	0.01	24	0.09	23	0.35	36	0.07	22	0.16
Indjic 2001		28	0.49	38	0.00	47	0.06	44	0.06	38	0.07	42	0.06
Katin 1996		18	0.52	58	0.00	39	0.06	49	0.06	55	0.05	48	0.05
Kiepura 1999		50	0.41	60	0.00	33	0.07	33	0.15	47	0.06	35	0.09
Korecka 1992		30	0.49	22	0.00	36	0.10	34	0.10	21	0.44	19	0.21
Kushner 1990		11	0.56	23	0.00	17	0.10	15	0.48	12	0.45	9	0.46
Lilamand 2001		57	0.37	44	0.00	43	0.07	36	0.07	53	0.04	49	0.05
Luisada 1990		49	0.41	52	0.00	50	0.07	39	0.07	58	0.05	41	0.06
Luisada 2008		55	0.38	16	0.01	46	0.06	42	0.06	48	0.05	50	0.05
Lushtak 2004		26	0.50	41	0.00	23	0.09	26	0.27	44	0.06	30	0.13
Malcuzynski 1951		40	0.45	18	0.00	35	0.06	47	0.06	48	0.05	52	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		15	0.53	10	0.02	11	0.15	14	0.48	30	0.17	16	0.29
Magaloff 1977		51	0.40	31	0.00	58	0.06	48	0.06	64	0.03	54	0.04
Magin 1975		13	0.53	7	0.05	7	0.16	10	0.57	29	0.29	10	0.41
Meguri 1997		58	0.37	40	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	67	0.01	65	0.01
Milkina 1970		4	0.61	13	0.01	6	0.17	5	0.65	13	0.49	5	0.56
Mohovich 1999		10	0.58	9	0.02	8	0.24	7	0.61	21	0.46	6	0.53
Nezu 2005		33	0.48	57	0.00	52	0.05	56	0.05	58	0.04	56	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.51	32	0.00	19	0.13	16	0.47	22	0.30	13	0.38
Olejniczak 1990		24	0.51	19	0.00	48	0.06	43	0.06	60	0.04	53	0.05
Osinska 1989		27	0.50	64	0.00	54	0.06	51	0.06	60	0.04	47	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		48	0.43	20	0.00	60	0.03	60	0.03	53	0.03	60	0.03
Poblocka 1999		7	0.59	17	0.00	12	0.15	6	0.62	22	0.35	7	0.47
Rangell 2001		54	0.39	59	0.00	59	0.05	58	0.05	62	0.03	58	0.04
Richter 1960		61	0.31	63	0.00	63	0.02	62	0.02	67	0.01	66	0.01
Richter 1961		25	0.51	34	0.00	16	0.12	18	0.43	24	0.36	12	0.39
Rosen 1989		56	0.38	61	0.00	62	0.03	61	0.03	61	0.03	61	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		20	0.51	48	0.00	27	0.09	27	0.26	39	0.06	31	0.12
Rubinstein 1952		44	0.44	49	0.00	42	0.07	40	0.07	54	0.05	46	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		29	0.49	24	0.00	18	0.11	19	0.42	46	0.05	26	0.14
Rudanovskaya 2007		2	0.63	6	0.07	5	0.19	4	0.70	11	0.55	3	0.62
Shebanova 2002		38	0.47	50	0.00	37	0.06	53	0.06	59	0.04	51	0.05
Smith 1975		35	0.48	27	0.00	45	0.06	46	0.06	37	0.08	38	0.07
Sztompka 1959		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Tanyel 1992		62	0.23	42	0.00	65	0.02	66	0.02	66	0.02	63	0.02
Tsujii 2005		37	0.47	66	0.00	53	0.06	45	0.06	63	0.03	55	0.04
Uninsky 1959		14	0.53	36	0.00	26	0.13	22	0.36	55	0.04	32	0.12
Vardi 1988		31	0.48	29	0.00	28	0.09	28	0.22	49	0.06	33	0.11
Wasowski 1980		60	0.34	65	0.00	64	0.02	63	0.02	62	0.03	62	0.02
Zimerman 1975		59	0.34	51	0.00	34	0.07	38	0.07	50	0.05	43	0.06
Average		1	0.67	1	0.22	1	0.21	1	0.74	54	0.05	21	0.19
Random 1		66	0.05	21	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	7	0.41	28	0.14
Random 2		65	0.05	45	0.00	56	0.05	54	0.05	16	0.38	27	0.14
Random 3		67	-0.03	35	0.00	61	0.02	64	0.02	61	0.03	64	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).