Smith 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.19	22	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.22	46	0.06	34	0.11
Ax 1995		57	0.33	56	0.00	47	0.05	58	0.05	59	0.04	57	0.04
Bacha 1998		39	0.47	23	0.00	43	0.06	45	0.06	33	0.12	36	0.08
Barbosa 1983		61	0.27	50	0.00	48	0.05	54	0.05	57	0.05	52	0.05
BenOr 1989		50	0.44	52	0.00	39	0.06	44	0.06	59	0.03	58	0.04
Biret 1990		34	0.49	20	0.00	37	0.09	34	0.09	53	0.04	47	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		40	0.47	31	0.00	35	0.07	41	0.07	26	0.29	28	0.14
Chiu 1999		21	0.55	10	0.01	17	0.13	20	0.42	32	0.21	16	0.30
Clidat 1994		33	0.50	16	0.01	14	0.13	17	0.43	18	0.38	10	0.40
Cohen 1997		62	0.25	48	0.00	61	0.03	61	0.03	45	0.04	61	0.03
Cortot 1951		38	0.48	47	0.00	54	0.06	42	0.06	56	0.04	55	0.05
Csalog 1996		2	0.66	1	0.32	1	0.31	3	0.72	4	0.58	3	0.65
Czerny 1989		53	0.42	54	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	57	0.04	50	0.05
Ezaki 2006		43	0.46	62	0.00	42	0.08	36	0.08	60	0.04	42	0.06
Falvay 1989		11	0.59	40	0.00	10	0.13	11	0.53	39	0.06	22	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		52	0.44	49	0.00	55	0.06	51	0.06	62	0.03	56	0.04
Fliere 1977		44	0.46	57	0.00	52	0.06	52	0.06	53	0.05	48	0.05
Fou 1978		51	0.44	53	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	62	0.03	60	0.03
Francois 1956		27	0.53	15	0.01	30	0.06	29	0.19	11	0.59	15	0.33
Goldenweiser 1946		6	0.63	9	0.01	5	0.30	4	0.70	7	0.60	2	0.65
Gornostaeva 1994		63	0.23	65	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	64	0.02	66	0.02
Groot 1988		17	0.56	13	0.01	9	0.18	10	0.53	27	0.28	12	0.39
Hatto 1993		24	0.54	35	0.00	33	0.07	32	0.14	52	0.05	38	0.08
Hatto 1997		13	0.56	28	0.00	24	0.11	23	0.32	50	0.05	29	0.13
Horszowski 1983		54	0.41	14	0.01	34	0.07	39	0.07	52	0.05	43	0.06
Indjic 2001		18	0.56	26	0.00	32	0.07	30	0.16	34	0.07	33	0.11
Katin 1996		9	0.61	34	0.00	16	0.14	14	0.48	35	0.09	18	0.21
Kiepura 1999		59	0.32	66	0.00	63	0.02	65	0.02	62	0.03	62	0.02
Korecka 1992		55	0.37	67	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	66	0.02	67	0.01
Kushner 1990		47	0.46	25	0.00	36	0.08	38	0.08	36	0.07	40	0.07
Lilamand 2001		42	0.47	17	0.01	38	0.08	35	0.08	34	0.09	37	0.08
Luisada 1990		30	0.51	43	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.19	40	0.07	32	0.12
Luisada 2008		46	0.46	55	0.00	31	0.06	33	0.12	32	0.12	31	0.12
Lushtak 2004		48	0.45	61	0.00	45	0.06	49	0.06	57	0.04	53	0.05
Malcuzynski 1951		12	0.57	4	0.04	7	0.19	7	0.58	5	0.62	5	0.60
Malcuzynski 1961		22	0.55	58	0.00	20	0.15	18	0.42	34	0.09	21	0.19
Magaloff 1977		19	0.55	33	0.00	18	0.13	16	0.44	16	0.35	11	0.39
Magin 1975		37	0.48	39	0.00	41	0.06	46	0.06	51	0.05	49	0.05
Meguri 1997		31	0.51	18	0.01	53	0.06	48	0.06	49	0.05	51	0.05
Milkina 1970		23	0.54	59	0.00	25	0.07	31	0.16	48	0.06	35	0.10
Mohovich 1999		45	0.46	63	0.00	51	0.07	40	0.07	55	0.04	54	0.05
Nezu 2005		5	0.63	7	0.02	13	0.16	8	0.56	14	0.48	7	0.52
Ohlsson 1999		4	0.64	3	0.14	3	0.36	1	0.76	2	0.71	1	0.73
Olejniczak 1990		49	0.45	32	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	58	0.04	59	0.04
Osinska 1989		15	0.56	42	0.00	21	0.11	21	0.34	38	0.07	26	0.15
Perlemuter 1992		35	0.49	11	0.01	46	0.05	56	0.05	14	0.47	25	0.15
Poblocka 1999		7	0.62	6	0.03	6	0.21	6	0.61	12	0.54	6	0.57
Rangell 2001		32	0.50	24	0.00	40	0.06	43	0.06	38	0.06	46	0.06
Richter 1960		14	0.56	21	0.00	19	0.13	13	0.50	30	0.23	14	0.34
Richter 1961		58	0.32	46	0.00	65	0.02	63	0.02	66	0.02	63	0.02
Rosen 1989		29	0.52	38	0.00	44	0.06	50	0.06	37	0.08	41	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		28	0.52	27	0.00	26	0.07	25	0.27	31	0.15	20	0.20
Rubinstein 1952		20	0.55	37	0.00	8	0.16	9	0.54	12	0.47	8	0.50
Rubinstein 1966		25	0.53	64	0.00	15	0.16	15	0.45	40	0.07	23	0.18
Rudanovskaya 2007		8	0.61	30	0.00	22	0.10	24	0.28	33	0.12	24	0.18
Shebanova 2002		16	0.56	41	0.00	11	0.15	12	0.51	25	0.27	13	0.37
Smith 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Sztompka 1959		36	0.48	51	0.00	50	0.08	37	0.08	46	0.06	39	0.07
Tanyel 1992		56	0.34	60	0.00	59	0.06	53	0.06	48	0.06	44	0.06
Tsujii 2005		10	0.60	8	0.02	12	0.13	19	0.42	27	0.20	17	0.29
Uninsky 1959		3	0.65	5	0.04	4	0.23	5	0.69	5	0.60	4	0.64
Vardi 1988		41	0.47	19	0.00	28	0.09	26	0.23	46	0.06	30	0.12
Wasowski 1980		26	0.53	12	0.01	23	0.09	22	0.32	9	0.59	9	0.43
Zimerman 1975		60	0.29	44	0.00	62	0.02	64	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02
Average		1	0.70	2	0.25	2	0.38	2	0.75	46	0.06	19	0.21
Random 1		67	0.02	36	0.00	60	0.03	60	0.03	28	0.11	45	0.06
Random 2		65	0.04	45	0.00	64	0.02	62	0.02	53	0.03	64	0.02
Random 3		66	0.03	29	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	12	0.43	27	0.15

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).