Richter 1960

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.26	19	0.00	23	0.15	24	0.39	27	0.36	22	0.37
Ax 1995		63	0.28	60	0.00	60	0.03	61	0.03	58	0.04	64	0.03
Bacha 1998		55	0.42	46	0.00	56	0.06	41	0.06	44	0.05	50	0.05
Barbosa 1983		58	0.36	59	0.00	34	0.05	44	0.05	52	0.06	53	0.05
BenOr 1989		12	0.63	13	0.00	12	0.15	11	0.64	7	0.58	9	0.61
Biret 1990		26	0.58	15	0.00	27	0.10	25	0.34	23	0.35	26	0.34
Brailowsky 1960		61	0.35	62	0.00	62	0.03	62	0.03	47	0.06	60	0.04
Chiu 1999		53	0.43	49	0.00	57	0.06	36	0.06	56	0.05	49	0.05
Clidat 1994		50	0.45	42	0.00	37	0.05	52	0.05	50	0.06	54	0.05
Cohen 1997		60	0.36	55	0.00	58	0.03	60	0.03	38	0.07	57	0.05
Cortot 1951		31	0.54	50	0.00	45	0.05	56	0.05	30	0.13	39	0.08
Csalog 1996		15	0.62	56	0.00	21	0.13	17	0.50	31	0.17	28	0.29
Czerny 1989		21	0.59	27	0.00	19	0.11	14	0.55	19	0.45	13	0.50
Ezaki 2006		37	0.53	41	0.00	24	0.19	22	0.40	22	0.36	20	0.38
Falvay 1989		9	0.64	44	0.00	14	0.12	12	0.62	28	0.22	21	0.37
Fiorentino 1962		43	0.50	65	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	46	0.06	58	0.05
Fliere 1977		41	0.51	47	0.00	51	0.05	49	0.05	40	0.07	42	0.06
Fou 1978		40	0.51	23	0.00	39	0.05	46	0.05	42	0.07	45	0.06
Francois 1956		57	0.41	53	0.00	61	0.03	63	0.03	50	0.04	65	0.03
Goldenweiser 1946		44	0.50	39	0.00	44	0.05	53	0.05	54	0.05	47	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		59	0.36	63	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	55	0.05	59	0.05
Groot 1988		10	0.64	6	0.03	6	0.18	3	0.71	6	0.60	7	0.65
Hatto 1993		24	0.59	45	0.00	30	0.06	29	0.24	31	0.15	29	0.19
Hatto 1997		23	0.59	58	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.21	41	0.06	36	0.11
Horszowski 1983		33	0.54	36	0.00	11	0.12	19	0.44	17	0.54	15	0.49
Indjic 2001		18	0.60	66	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.23	35	0.07	31	0.13
Katin 1996		6	0.65	28	0.00	16	0.10	23	0.39	27	0.32	24	0.35
Kiepura 1999		46	0.48	31	0.00	54	0.06	39	0.06	38	0.08	40	0.07
Korecka 1992		54	0.42	67	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	63	0.03	62	0.03
Kushner 1990		51	0.45	20	0.00	50	0.05	55	0.05	41	0.06	52	0.05
Lilamand 2001		7	0.64	17	0.00	9	0.15	6	0.68	5	0.73	4	0.70
Luisada 1990		8	0.64	18	0.00	4	0.15	5	0.69	5	0.69	6	0.69
Luisada 2008		56	0.41	11	0.01	55	0.07	35	0.07	51	0.05	46	0.06
Lushtak 2004		32	0.54	10	0.01	29	0.08	28	0.25	46	0.06	34	0.12
Malcuzynski 1951		47	0.48	30	0.00	41	0.06	38	0.06	12	0.51	30	0.17
Malcuzynski 1961		11	0.63	25	0.00	10	0.24	9	0.64	7	0.56	10	0.60
Magaloff 1977		16	0.62	3	0.06	5	0.17	13	0.59	5	0.66	8	0.62
Magin 1975		30	0.55	9	0.01	22	0.12	21	0.42	30	0.25	27	0.32
Meguri 1997		17	0.61	16	0.00	26	0.09	26	0.27	15	0.49	23	0.36
Milkina 1970		29	0.55	35	0.00	48	0.05	51	0.05	46	0.06	51	0.05
Mohovich 1999		36	0.53	26	0.00	42	0.06	37	0.06	44	0.05	56	0.05
Nezu 2005		19	0.60	61	0.00	43	0.05	47	0.05	47	0.06	55	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		38	0.53	22	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.08	35	0.08	38	0.08
Olejniczak 1990		34	0.54	37	0.00	40	0.05	45	0.05	22	0.27	35	0.12
Osinska 1989		3	0.68	12	0.01	7	0.19	2	0.72	3	0.69	3	0.70
Perlemuter 1992		27	0.56	5	0.03	25	0.11	27	0.25	3	0.70	19	0.42
Poblocka 1999		39	0.51	38	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	35	0.08	43	0.06
Rangell 2001		4	0.68	4	0.05	3	0.14	4	0.69	5	0.77	1	0.73
Richter 1960		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Richter 1961		45	0.50	33	0.00	46	0.05	54	0.05	47	0.06	48	0.05
Rosen 1989		5	0.67	24	0.00	15	0.16	8	0.64	5	0.76	5	0.70
Rubinstein 1939		42	0.50	40	0.00	35	0.06	40	0.06	40	0.06	44	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		35	0.54	54	0.00	18	0.10	20	0.42	13	0.45	18	0.43
Rubinstein 1966		25	0.58	32	0.00	17	0.09	18	0.49	20	0.39	16	0.44
Rudanovskaya 2007		20	0.60	48	0.00	47	0.04	58	0.04	51	0.04	61	0.04
Shebanova 2002		22	0.59	7	0.02	13	0.14	15	0.53	18	0.48	14	0.50
Smith 1975		28	0.56	21	0.00	28	0.08	30	0.23	13	0.50	25	0.34
Sztompka 1959		62	0.31	57	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	62	0.02	67	0.01
Tanyel 1992		13	0.62	2	0.15	2	0.22	10	0.64	2	0.80	2	0.72
Tsujii 2005		2	0.69	8	0.01	8	0.17	7	0.67	11	0.49	11	0.57
Uninsky 1959		14	0.62	34	0.00	20	0.12	16	0.52	10	0.53	12	0.52
Vardi 1988		49	0.45	14	0.00	33	0.07	33	0.13	47	0.06	37	0.09
Wasowski 1980		48	0.46	43	0.00	53	0.06	42	0.06	27	0.24	32	0.12
Zimerman 1975		52	0.44	29	0.00	38	0.06	43	0.06	36	0.09	41	0.07
Average		1	0.76	1	0.53	1	0.52	1	0.86	28	0.22	17	0.43
Random 1		66	0.04	64	0.00	65	0.02	66	0.02	41	0.04	63	0.03
Random 2		65	0.09	51	0.00	63	0.03	59	0.03	10	0.46	33	0.12
Random 3		67	-0.04	52	0.00	66	0.02	65	0.02	54	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).