Random 3

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		53	-0.04	15	0.01	67	0.01	67	0.01	67	0.01	66	0.01
Ax 1995		3	0.06	11	0.02	15	0.09	19	0.37	65	0.02	20	0.09
Bacha 1998		13	0.02	8	0.03	24	0.06	28	0.13	65	0.02	29	0.05
Barbosa 1983		9	0.03	45	0.00	23	0.06	23	0.21	66	0.02	26	0.06
BenOr 1989		22	0.00	47	0.00	26	0.06	26	0.15	66	0.02	32	0.05
Biret 1990		59	-0.04	27	0.00	63	0.03	58	0.03	67	0.01	62	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		35	-0.01	38	0.00	33	0.05	33	0.09	59	0.04	24	0.06
Chiu 1999		48	-0.03	50	0.00	52	0.03	52	0.03	66	0.02	52	0.02
Clidat 1994		17	0.01	3	0.07	8	0.11	15	0.38	65	0.02	19	0.09
Cohen 1997		33	-0.01	24	0.00	41	0.04	37	0.04	65	0.02	43	0.03
Cortot 1951		51	-0.03	42	0.00	40	0.04	41	0.04	66	0.02	45	0.03
Csalog 1996		15	0.01	43	0.00	14	0.09	10	0.44	66	0.02	15	0.09
Czerny 1989		11	0.03	30	0.00	16	0.12	16	0.37	66	0.02	14	0.09
Ezaki 2006		46	-0.03	67	0.00	53	0.03	46	0.03	67	0.01	48	0.02
Falvay 1989		60	-0.04	55	0.00	61	0.03	59	0.03	67	0.01	53	0.02
Fiorentino 1962		25	0.00	53	0.00	30	0.05	29	0.13	65	0.03	27	0.06
Fliere 1977		37	-0.02	60	0.00	43	0.04	42	0.04	64	0.02	35	0.03
Fou 1978		24	0.00	65	0.00	36	0.05	36	0.05	66	0.02	37	0.03
Francois 1956		54	-0.04	41	0.00	35	0.04	40	0.04	47	0.05	34	0.04
Goldenweiser 1946		57	-0.04	28	0.00	57	0.03	50	0.03	65	0.02	51	0.02
Gornostaeva 1994		23	0.00	46	0.00	51	0.04	44	0.04	61	0.03	44	0.03
Groot 1988		36	-0.01	54	0.00	27	0.06	24	0.17	65	0.02	28	0.06
Hatto 1993		43	-0.02	66	0.00	55	0.03	48	0.03	67	0.01	63	0.02
Hatto 1997		61	-0.05	63	0.00	59	0.02	64	0.02	67	0.01	65	0.01
Horszowski 1983		16	0.01	34	0.00	18	0.12	17	0.37	65	0.02	12	0.09
Indjic 2001		50	-0.03	58	0.00	54	0.04	45	0.04	66	0.02	42	0.03
Katin 1996		26	0.00	5	0.04	3	0.13	6	0.50	64	0.03	7	0.12
Kiepura 1999		65	-0.07	40	0.00	64	0.03	60	0.03	64	0.02	49	0.02
Korecka 1992		42	-0.02	21	0.00	50	0.03	51	0.03	61	0.03	38	0.03
Kushner 1990		6	0.05	9	0.03	7	0.10	5	0.51	63	0.03	8	0.12
Lilamand 2001		12	0.02	35	0.00	11	0.10	9	0.45	63	0.02	17	0.09
Luisada 1990		30	0.00	51	0.00	28	0.05	30	0.11	67	0.01	39	0.03
Luisada 2008		1	0.09	7	0.04	10	0.13	7	0.49	60	0.04	4	0.14
Lushtak 2004		52	-0.03	62	0.00	46	0.03	55	0.03	67	0.01	58	0.02
Malcuzynski 1951		19	0.00	6	0.04	20	0.12	20	0.30	56	0.04	10	0.11
Malcuzynski 1961		7	0.04	17	0.01	4	0.12	3	0.54	65	0.03	5	0.13
Magaloff 1977		18	0.00	59	0.00	39	0.04	43	0.04	67	0.01	56	0.02
Magin 1975		14	0.02	14	0.02	6	0.14	4	0.51	66	0.02	11	0.10
Meguri 1997		31	-0.01	39	0.00	29	0.05	27	0.14	61	0.03	25	0.06
Milkina 1970		41	-0.02	44	0.00	32	0.05	32	0.10	66	0.02	33	0.04
Mohovich 1999		49	-0.03	52	0.00	47	0.03	53	0.03	66	0.02	61	0.02
Nezu 2005		29	0.00	29	0.00	17	0.13	18	0.37	64	0.03	9	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		5	0.05	2	0.10	2	0.21	2	0.58	61	0.04	3	0.15
Olejniczak 1990		55	-0.04	16	0.01	37	0.05	35	0.05	65	0.02	46	0.03
Osinska 1989		39	-0.02	13	0.02	31	0.05	31	0.11	64	0.03	23	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		32	-0.01	20	0.01	42	0.04	38	0.04	62	0.02	36	0.03
Poblocka 1999		28	0.00	18	0.01	21	0.10	21	0.30	65	0.02	21	0.08
Rangell 2001		67	-0.10	64	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	67	0.01	67	0.01
Richter 1960		58	-0.04	37	0.00	45	0.03	54	0.03	65	0.02	55	0.02
Richter 1961		64	-0.06	56	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	67	0.01	64	0.01
Rosen 1989		62	-0.05	49	0.00	48	0.03	56	0.03	60	0.03	41	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		20	0.00	10	0.03	5	0.10	13	0.41	65	0.02	13	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		40	-0.02	48	0.00	34	0.05	34	0.05	66	0.02	47	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		27	0.00	31	0.00	12	0.08	11	0.44	66	0.02	16	0.09
Rudanovskaya 2007		63	-0.06	36	0.00	60	0.02	63	0.02	65	0.02	57	0.02
Shebanova 2002		34	-0.01	26	0.00	22	0.10	22	0.26	65	0.02	22	0.07
Smith 1975		8	0.03	4	0.06	9	0.13	12	0.43	57	0.05	2	0.15
Sztompka 1959		44	-0.03	22	0.00	62	0.03	61	0.03	64	0.02	54	0.02
Tanyel 1992		45	-0.03	32	0.00	49	0.03	49	0.03	62	0.04	40	0.03
Tsujii 2005		56	-0.04	33	0.00	56	0.03	57	0.03	67	0.01	59	0.02
Uninsky 1959		2	0.06	1	0.35	1	0.35	1	0.66	53	0.05	1	0.18
Vardi 1988		4	0.06	25	0.00	13	0.09	8	0.47	63	0.03	6	0.12
Wasowski 1980		47	-0.03	57	0.00	58	0.02	62	0.02	64	0.02	50	0.02
Zimerman 1975		21	0.00	19	0.01	25	0.06	25	0.15	64	0.02	31	0.05
Average		38	-0.02	61	0.00	19	0.14	14	0.39	66	0.02	18	0.09
Random 1		66	-0.07	12	0.02	44	0.03	47	0.03	67	0.01	60	0.02
Random 2		10	0.03	23	0.00	38	0.04	39	0.04	35	0.07	30	0.05
Random 3		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).