Olejniczak 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		66	0.06	66	0.00	48	0.08	34	0.08	54	0.05	43	0.06
Ax 1995		61	0.37	65	0.00	46	0.05	45	0.05	42	0.06	53	0.05
Bacha 1998		44	0.49	13	0.01	32	0.07	32	0.13	27	0.22	21	0.17
Barbosa 1983		60	0.37	17	0.00	12	0.12	15	0.40	30	0.19	14	0.28
BenOr 1989		2	0.69	2	0.22	2	0.28	2	0.77	4	0.67	1	0.72
Biret 1990		27	0.56	59	0.00	25	0.05	25	0.24	40	0.06	31	0.12
Brailowsky 1960		63	0.28	22	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	66	0.02	66	0.01
Chiu 1999		33	0.54	55	0.00	42	0.06	37	0.06	44	0.07	40	0.06
Clidat 1994		47	0.47	12	0.01	39	0.05	50	0.05	55	0.05	51	0.05
Cohen 1997		48	0.45	16	0.00	22	0.08	19	0.31	6	0.68	7	0.46
Cortot 1951		20	0.59	36	0.00	38	0.05	43	0.05	42	0.05	54	0.05
Csalog 1996		23	0.57	64	0.00	24	0.06	20	0.29	47	0.05	27	0.12
Czerny 1989		45	0.48	57	0.00	28	0.06	29	0.18	46	0.05	36	0.09
Ezaki 2006		41	0.50	60	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	59	0.04	55	0.04
Falvay 1989		11	0.61	29	0.00	34	0.05	44	0.05	63	0.04	57	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		3	0.69	4	0.10	4	0.32	3	0.75	4	0.65	2	0.70
Fliere 1977		13	0.61	28	0.00	14	0.12	13	0.42	18	0.35	10	0.38
Fou 1978		5	0.66	1	0.24	1	0.24	4	0.71	4	0.65	3	0.68
Francois 1956		56	0.41	40	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	64	0.02	67	0.01
Goldenweiser 1946		30	0.54	35	0.00	50	0.04	57	0.04	42	0.06	45	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		51	0.44	44	0.00	27	0.05	24	0.25	15	0.49	11	0.35
Groot 1988		17	0.59	9	0.02	7	0.13	8	0.51	25	0.30	9	0.39
Hatto 1993		16	0.60	32	0.00	13	0.14	11	0.44	27	0.23	13	0.32
Hatto 1997		19	0.59	56	0.00	20	0.10	18	0.31	44	0.05	30	0.12
Horszowski 1983		15	0.61	5	0.05	5	0.34	5	0.61	4	0.65	4	0.63
Indjic 2001		6	0.66	7	0.03	9	0.13	7	0.53	24	0.34	8	0.42
Katin 1996		7	0.64	30	0.00	15	0.14	12	0.44	36	0.09	19	0.20
Kiepura 1999		32	0.54	24	0.00	29	0.07	26	0.21	21	0.34	15	0.27
Korecka 1992		29	0.54	26	0.00	54	0.04	55	0.04	40	0.06	46	0.05
Kushner 1990		54	0.44	18	0.00	52	0.04	53	0.04	46	0.06	50	0.05
Lilamand 2001		35	0.53	27	0.00	23	0.06	23	0.26	45	0.06	28	0.12
Luisada 1990		38	0.52	6	0.03	11	0.13	14	0.40	33	0.14	17	0.24
Luisada 2008		43	0.49	21	0.00	31	0.09	27	0.19	47	0.05	33	0.10
Lushtak 2004		25	0.57	20	0.00	21	0.08	21	0.28	39	0.07	24	0.14
Malcuzynski 1951		62	0.34	34	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	57	0.04	65	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		21	0.58	8	0.02	10	0.16	10	0.45	31	0.16	16	0.27
Magaloff 1977		28	0.55	38	0.00	18	0.11	16	0.38	21	0.28	12	0.33
Magin 1975		50	0.45	49	0.00	51	0.04	54	0.04	58	0.04	59	0.04
Meguri 1997		14	0.61	41	0.00	26	0.05	31	0.14	23	0.33	18	0.21
Milkina 1970		10	0.62	33	0.00	35	0.06	40	0.06	49	0.06	41	0.06
Mohovich 1999		9	0.63	23	0.00	8	0.13	6	0.55	24	0.39	6	0.46
Nezu 2005		12	0.61	15	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.11	40	0.07	37	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		59	0.38	67	0.00	65	0.03	63	0.03	64	0.03	63	0.03
Olejniczak 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Osinska 1989		8	0.64	61	0.00	36	0.06	36	0.06	45	0.06	38	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		36	0.52	14	0.00	55	0.05	41	0.05	30	0.15	35	0.09
Poblocka 1999		26	0.57	46	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.06	37	0.07	39	0.06
Rangell 2001		37	0.52	10	0.01	37	0.06	38	0.06	44	0.06	44	0.06
Richter 1960		31	0.54	42	0.00	17	0.08	22	0.27	45	0.05	29	0.12
Richter 1961		18	0.59	19	0.00	6	0.19	9	0.49	15	0.51	5	0.50
Rosen 1989		24	0.57	31	0.00	47	0.08	35	0.08	31	0.21	25	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		58	0.41	54	0.00	62	0.04	56	0.04	64	0.03	62	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		55	0.43	63	0.00	58	0.04	59	0.04	58	0.04	61	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.51	50	0.00	19	0.11	17	0.36	44	0.06	23	0.15
Rudanovskaya 2007		4	0.67	11	0.01	16	0.11	30	0.17	35	0.06	34	0.10
Shebanova 2002		42	0.50	37	0.00	56	0.05	46	0.05	58	0.04	60	0.04
Smith 1975		49	0.45	47	0.00	60	0.04	58	0.04	55	0.05	58	0.04
Sztompka 1959		40	0.51	62	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	43	0.06	49	0.05
Tanyel 1992		52	0.44	39	0.00	43	0.05	49	0.05	40	0.08	42	0.06
Tsujii 2005		22	0.58	53	0.00	44	0.05	42	0.05	57	0.05	52	0.05
Uninsky 1959		34	0.53	51	0.00	49	0.05	52	0.05	45	0.05	47	0.05
Vardi 1988		53	0.44	58	0.00	40	0.05	51	0.05	44	0.06	48	0.05
Wasowski 1980		57	0.41	48	0.00	59	0.03	61	0.03	55	0.05	56	0.04
Zimerman 1975		46	0.47	43	0.00	30	0.08	28	0.18	34	0.10	26	0.13
Average		1	0.75	3	0.21	3	0.32	1	0.78	53	0.05	20	0.20
Random 1		65	0.09	25	0.00	61	0.03	62	0.03	6	0.42	32	0.11
Random 2		64	0.10	45	0.00	57	0.05	47	0.05	4	0.51	22	0.16
Random 3		67	-0.04	52	0.00	63	0.02	65	0.02	35	0.05	64	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).