Mohovich 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.08	67	0.00	60	0.04	52	0.04	50	0.06	57	0.05
Ax 1995		63	0.35	16	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	35	0.07	58	0.05
Bacha 1998		48	0.50	40	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.06	14	0.37	36	0.15
Barbosa 1983		57	0.46	36	0.00	16	0.17	17	0.52	9	0.60	16	0.56
BenOr 1989		14	0.63	13	0.01	18	0.14	14	0.59	8	0.58	13	0.58
Biret 1990		4	0.68	4	0.03	2	0.25	3	0.68	5	0.66	2	0.67
Brailowsky 1960		41	0.53	24	0.00	25	0.12	23	0.40	6	0.69	19	0.53
Chiu 1999		19	0.61	25	0.00	12	0.16	13	0.59	6	0.62	11	0.60
Clidat 1994		53	0.48	56	0.00	43	0.05	46	0.05	38	0.07	49	0.06
Cohen 1997		62	0.40	51	0.00	57	0.05	50	0.05	17	0.53	34	0.16
Cortot 1951		31	0.58	29	0.00	46	0.06	38	0.06	26	0.19	42	0.11
Csalog 1996		6	0.66	38	0.00	10	0.22	7	0.62	13	0.51	17	0.56
Czerny 1989		15	0.63	32	0.00	4	0.18	6	0.65	3	0.66	5	0.65
Ezaki 2006		40	0.53	18	0.00	28	0.07	26	0.25	24	0.33	25	0.29
Falvay 1989		9	0.65	19	0.00	14	0.18	16	0.54	20	0.35	24	0.43
Fiorentino 1962		16	0.62	26	0.00	20	0.16	20	0.48	13	0.48	22	0.48
Fliere 1977		26	0.58	57	0.00	27	0.08	28	0.19	17	0.36	27	0.26
Fou 1978		12	0.64	2	0.05	7	0.17	4	0.67	2	0.67	1	0.67
Francois 1956		42	0.53	30	0.00	55	0.06	40	0.06	19	0.51	33	0.17
Goldenweiser 1946		34	0.57	20	0.00	36	0.06	39	0.06	27	0.22	41	0.11
Gornostaeva 1994		52	0.48	27	0.00	34	0.08	34	0.08	9	0.57	30	0.21
Groot 1988		8	0.65	14	0.01	8	0.17	5	0.67	5	0.62	9	0.64
Hatto 1993		27	0.58	47	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.07	35	0.08	46	0.07
Hatto 1997		37	0.54	64	0.00	52	0.03	63	0.03	34	0.07	56	0.05
Horszowski 1983		22	0.59	34	0.00	17	0.12	18	0.50	6	0.64	14	0.57
Indjic 2001		20	0.60	49	0.00	48	0.04	51	0.04	50	0.05	64	0.04
Katin 1996		3	0.69	28	0.00	9	0.19	2	0.69	4	0.63	3	0.66
Kiepura 1999		23	0.59	8	0.01	21	0.14	22	0.44	5	0.69	18	0.55
Korecka 1992		32	0.58	9	0.01	40	0.04	57	0.04	13	0.58	37	0.15
Kushner 1990		49	0.50	35	0.00	33	0.08	32	0.15	15	0.40	28	0.24
Lilamand 2001		47	0.51	61	0.00	30	0.06	29	0.18	31	0.24	29	0.21
Luisada 1990		45	0.52	54	0.00	31	0.06	33	0.14	38	0.07	44	0.10
Luisada 2008		58	0.45	23	0.00	51	0.04	54	0.04	59	0.04	62	0.04
Lushtak 2004		28	0.58	39	0.00	24	0.11	25	0.31	26	0.28	26	0.29
Malcuzynski 1951		61	0.41	55	0.00	64	0.04	56	0.04	51	0.05	65	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		25	0.58	41	0.00	19	0.18	19	0.49	16	0.49	21	0.49
Magaloff 1977		46	0.51	65	0.00	50	0.04	53	0.04	48	0.05	63	0.04
Magin 1975		24	0.58	17	0.00	13	0.17	8	0.61	5	0.61	10	0.61
Meguri 1997		43	0.52	58	0.00	61	0.03	64	0.03	41	0.06	61	0.04
Milkina 1970		5	0.68	5	0.02	11	0.14	10	0.60	4	0.70	6	0.65
Mohovich 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Nezu 2005		21	0.59	59	0.00	47	0.05	49	0.05	36	0.08	50	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		39	0.53	60	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.07	25	0.28	38	0.14
Olejniczak 1990		13	0.63	11	0.01	22	0.13	24	0.39	6	0.55	23	0.46
Osinska 1989		17	0.61	52	0.00	29	0.06	31	0.16	28	0.22	31	0.19
Perlemuter 1992		36	0.54	7	0.01	42	0.05	45	0.05	15	0.47	35	0.15
Poblocka 1999		30	0.58	37	0.00	45	0.06	42	0.06	55	0.05	53	0.05
Rangell 2001		44	0.52	62	0.00	58	0.04	61	0.04	37	0.07	59	0.05
Richter 1960		38	0.53	22	0.00	54	0.05	44	0.05	37	0.06	55	0.05
Richter 1961		7	0.65	6	0.02	3	0.19	9	0.61	3	0.69	4	0.65
Rosen 1989		33	0.58	45	0.00	49	0.04	60	0.04	26	0.43	39	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		51	0.48	53	0.00	39	0.07	36	0.07	32	0.14	43	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		50	0.50	42	0.00	53	0.04	58	0.04	43	0.06	60	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		10	0.64	46	0.00	5	0.18	15	0.58	11	0.56	15	0.57
Rudanovskaya 2007		2	0.72	3	0.04	6	0.17	12	0.59	4	0.69	8	0.64
Shebanova 2002		11	0.64	12	0.01	15	0.15	11	0.59	5	0.60	12	0.59
Smith 1975		56	0.46	63	0.00	63	0.04	55	0.04	40	0.07	54	0.05
Sztompka 1959		29	0.58	33	0.00	23	0.12	21	0.46	7	0.61	20	0.53
Tanyel 1992		60	0.42	15	0.00	59	0.05	47	0.05	33	0.13	45	0.08
Tsujii 2005		18	0.61	10	0.01	26	0.08	27	0.22	40	0.07	40	0.12
Uninsky 1959		35	0.56	50	0.00	37	0.06	41	0.06	35	0.07	47	0.06
Vardi 1988		55	0.47	21	0.00	32	0.06	30	0.17	30	0.17	32	0.17
Wasowski 1980		59	0.43	31	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	49	0.06	52	0.05
Zimerman 1975		54	0.47	48	0.00	41	0.05	48	0.05	42	0.07	51	0.06
Average		1	0.78	1	0.72	1	0.71	1	0.87	9	0.49	7	0.65
Random 1		66	0.02	43	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	37	0.05	66	0.02
Random 2		65	0.04	66	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	26	0.18	48	0.06
Random 3		67	-0.03	44	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	53	0.03	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).