Malcuzynski 1961

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.28	34	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.14	25	0.37	32	0.23
Ax 1995		63	0.37	37	0.00	59	0.04	58	0.04	52	0.04	67	0.04
Bacha 1998		50	0.48	60	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.07	11	0.43	37	0.17
Barbosa 1983		47	0.50	4	0.01	3	0.27	14	0.50	12	0.59	11	0.54
BenOr 1989		16	0.60	25	0.00	8	0.17	8	0.55	13	0.54	13	0.54
Biret 1990		43	0.53	67	0.00	46	0.06	44	0.06	35	0.08	51	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		62	0.41	27	0.00	58	0.04	59	0.04	37	0.08	54	0.06
Chiu 1999		15	0.60	14	0.00	16	0.16	15	0.50	7	0.58	10	0.54
Clidat 1994		55	0.46	56	0.00	55	0.05	51	0.05	35	0.08	58	0.06
Cohen 1997		61	0.42	39	0.00	52	0.05	53	0.05	9	0.60	38	0.17
Cortot 1951		34	0.55	48	0.00	48	0.07	40	0.07	16	0.27	42	0.14
Csalog 1996		2	0.66	50	0.00	2	0.21	4	0.58	7	0.55	8	0.56
Czerny 1989		24	0.59	9	0.01	12	0.21	11	0.52	15	0.51	15	0.51
Ezaki 2006		39	0.53	36	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.12	30	0.21	39	0.16
Falvay 1989		7	0.62	15	0.00	18	0.10	21	0.44	31	0.17	29	0.27
Fiorentino 1962		32	0.58	24	0.00	37	0.06	42	0.06	45	0.06	60	0.06
Fliere 1977		38	0.53	63	0.00	47	0.07	38	0.07	38	0.07	48	0.07
Fou 1978		8	0.62	11	0.00	4	0.15	6	0.58	6	0.62	4	0.60
Francois 1956		58	0.44	43	0.00	62	0.03	61	0.03	36	0.08	63	0.05
Goldenweiser 1946		22	0.60	21	0.00	22	0.10	17	0.47	11	0.48	19	0.47
Gornostaeva 1994		57	0.44	33	0.00	38	0.06	45	0.06	12	0.53	36	0.18
Groot 1988		3	0.64	2	0.02	11	0.17	2	0.59	8	0.57	6	0.58
Hatto 1993		10	0.61	42	0.00	23	0.11	20	0.44	20	0.43	22	0.43
Hatto 1997		17	0.60	30	0.00	24	0.16	18	0.46	17	0.43	20	0.44
Horszowski 1983		25	0.59	51	0.00	7	0.18	9	0.54	3	0.67	3	0.60
Indjic 2001		18	0.60	40	0.00	28	0.07	26	0.30	22	0.38	25	0.34
Katin 1996		9	0.61	59	0.00	21	0.09	23	0.43	24	0.36	24	0.39
Kiepura 1999		51	0.48	47	0.00	51	0.07	41	0.07	33	0.11	45	0.09
Korecka 1992		53	0.47	61	0.00	63	0.03	64	0.03	50	0.05	64	0.04
Kushner 1990		44	0.53	16	0.00	36	0.07	39	0.07	13	0.45	34	0.18
Lilamand 2001		4	0.63	12	0.00	5	0.23	3	0.59	4	0.73	1	0.66
Luisada 1990		31	0.58	46	0.00	9	0.13	12	0.51	15	0.51	16	0.51
Luisada 2008		49	0.49	6	0.01	41	0.09	35	0.09	18	0.37	35	0.18
Lushtak 2004		28	0.58	8	0.01	26	0.11	27	0.24	24	0.28	31	0.26
Malcuzynski 1951		20	0.60	10	0.01	13	0.19	13	0.51	4	0.64	7	0.57
Malcuzynski 1961		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magaloff 1977		21	0.60	41	0.00	19	0.10	19	0.46	6	0.63	12	0.54
Magin 1975		13	0.61	7	0.01	14	0.20	10	0.53	8	0.51	14	0.52
Meguri 1997		41	0.53	18	0.00	56	0.04	55	0.04	36	0.08	57	0.06
Milkina 1970		11	0.61	29	0.00	29	0.08	28	0.21	18	0.38	28	0.28
Mohovich 1999		27	0.58	38	0.00	15	0.16	16	0.49	19	0.49	18	0.49
Nezu 2005		42	0.53	65	0.00	57	0.04	56	0.04	50	0.05	66	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		45	0.50	53	0.00	43	0.08	36	0.08	38	0.07	50	0.07
Olejniczak 1990		26	0.58	22	0.00	27	0.06	31	0.16	10	0.45	30	0.27
Osinska 1989		6	0.62	19	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.19	23	0.40	27	0.28
Perlemuter 1992		54	0.46	44	0.00	64	0.03	62	0.03	33	0.12	53	0.06
Poblocka 1999		33	0.57	23	0.00	42	0.06	46	0.06	38	0.07	55	0.06
Rangell 2001		46	0.50	58	0.00	54	0.04	54	0.04	33	0.16	47	0.08
Richter 1960		5	0.63	5	0.01	10	0.15	7	0.56	9	0.64	5	0.60
Richter 1961		48	0.50	17	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	41	0.07	56	0.06
Rosen 1989		36	0.54	62	0.00	50	0.06	43	0.06	27	0.41	41	0.16
Rubinstein 1939		37	0.54	35	0.00	35	0.05	52	0.05	23	0.35	43	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		30	0.58	20	0.00	17	0.10	22	0.43	5	0.61	17	0.51
Rubinstein 1966		14	0.60	3	0.01	6	0.17	5	0.58	12	0.54	9	0.56
Rudanovskaya 2007		23	0.59	26	0.00	34	0.06	49	0.06	16	0.41	40	0.16
Shebanova 2002		19	0.60	13	0.00	20	0.09	25	0.37	20	0.43	23	0.40
Smith 1975		35	0.55	57	0.00	40	0.09	34	0.09	18	0.42	33	0.19
Sztompka 1959		40	0.53	54	0.00	31	0.09	30	0.17	14	0.48	26	0.29
Tanyel 1992		60	0.43	55	0.00	60	0.03	63	0.03	45	0.07	62	0.05
Tsujii 2005		29	0.58	28	0.00	44	0.06	50	0.06	47	0.06	59	0.06
Uninsky 1959		12	0.61	31	0.00	25	0.15	24	0.41	12	0.46	21	0.43
Vardi 1988		52	0.48	32	0.00	45	0.06	48	0.06	39	0.08	49	0.07
Wasowski 1980		59	0.44	49	0.00	61	0.03	60	0.03	33	0.13	52	0.06
Zimerman 1975		56	0.46	45	0.00	53	0.04	57	0.04	37	0.08	61	0.06
Average		1	0.77	1	0.82	1	0.81	1	0.90	13	0.46	2	0.64
Random 1		65	0.08	52	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	12	0.29	46	0.08
Random 2		66	0.05	66	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	28	0.17	65	0.04
Random 3		67	0.04	64	0.00	65	0.03	65	0.03	3	0.54	44	0.13

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).