Lushtak 2004

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.27	23	0.00	38	0.06	45	0.06	42	0.06	55	0.06
Ax 1995		61	0.37	42	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	53	0.04	63	0.04
Bacha 1998		56	0.45	34	0.00	52	0.04	59	0.04	39	0.05	62	0.04
Barbosa 1983		60	0.40	59	0.00	34	0.06	43	0.06	35	0.09	51	0.07
BenOr 1989		12	0.60	7	0.01	12	0.12	10	0.49	17	0.50	12	0.49
Biret 1990		26	0.58	53	0.00	28	0.10	22	0.28	19	0.40	22	0.33
Brailowsky 1960		62	0.36	54	0.00	61	0.03	61	0.03	54	0.04	65	0.03
Chiu 1999		48	0.49	64	0.00	50	0.06	47	0.06	34	0.09	50	0.07
Clidat 1994		34	0.55	4	0.02	11	0.16	15	0.44	10	0.56	10	0.50
Cohen 1997		59	0.40	29	0.00	54	0.03	60	0.03	11	0.58	41	0.13
Cortot 1951		31	0.56	48	0.00	47	0.07	37	0.07	23	0.20	45	0.12
Csalog 1996		14	0.60	32	0.00	19	0.09	17	0.41	33	0.14	30	0.24
Czerny 1989		21	0.58	30	0.00	13	0.14	12	0.46	14	0.52	11	0.49
Ezaki 2006		41	0.52	20	0.00	37	0.05	48	0.05	36	0.07	53	0.06
Falvay 1989		4	0.65	28	0.00	7	0.19	5	0.61	17	0.36	13	0.47
Fiorentino 1962		3	0.67	5	0.01	6	0.21	3	0.66	3	0.67	1	0.66
Fliere 1977		32	0.56	55	0.00	30	0.07	29	0.17	16	0.38	27	0.25
Fou 1978		27	0.57	41	0.00	29	0.10	27	0.25	19	0.31	24	0.28
Francois 1956		63	0.36	67	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	48	0.05	66	0.03
Goldenweiser 1946		40	0.53	47	0.00	48	0.07	35	0.07	50	0.05	54	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		52	0.46	11	0.01	31	0.06	31	0.13	19	0.48	28	0.25
Groot 1988		5	0.63	25	0.00	9	0.19	6	0.59	13	0.50	8	0.54
Hatto 1993		18	0.59	18	0.00	20	0.08	18	0.36	24	0.38	20	0.37
Hatto 1997		11	0.61	36	0.00	27	0.08	25	0.28	20	0.40	21	0.33
Horszowski 1983		15	0.60	6	0.01	3	0.15	9	0.53	2	0.68	4	0.60
Indjic 2001		7	0.62	46	0.00	15	0.10	13	0.45	15	0.47	14	0.46
Katin 1996		9	0.61	12	0.01	14	0.09	14	0.44	25	0.34	19	0.39
Kiepura 1999		35	0.55	52	0.00	44	0.08	34	0.08	14	0.48	31	0.20
Korecka 1992		39	0.53	65	0.00	57	0.04	55	0.04	22	0.43	39	0.13
Kushner 1990		53	0.46	22	0.00	23	0.08	30	0.16	19	0.36	29	0.24
Lilamand 2001		28	0.57	17	0.00	21	0.09	20	0.34	18	0.55	17	0.43
Luisada 1990		13	0.60	31	0.00	10	0.16	8	0.55	11	0.57	6	0.56
Luisada 2008		42	0.51	35	0.00	35	0.07	38	0.07	23	0.31	35	0.15
Lushtak 2004		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Malcuzynski 1951		58	0.41	63	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	53	0.05	64	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		23	0.58	37	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.28	27	0.24	25	0.26
Magaloff 1977		49	0.48	60	0.00	56	0.05	50	0.05	37	0.06	60	0.05
Magin 1975		8	0.62	13	0.00	8	0.17	7	0.57	7	0.54	7	0.55
Meguri 1997		19	0.59	10	0.01	42	0.06	41	0.06	17	0.47	34	0.17
Milkina 1970		33	0.56	38	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.12	35	0.08	47	0.10
Mohovich 1999		24	0.58	62	0.00	25	0.08	26	0.28	25	0.31	23	0.29
Nezu 2005		25	0.58	14	0.00	46	0.07	40	0.07	27	0.21	43	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		47	0.49	27	0.00	51	0.05	52	0.05	53	0.05	59	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		29	0.57	49	0.00	45	0.07	39	0.07	21	0.28	37	0.14
Osinska 1989		2	0.67	15	0.00	4	0.18	4	0.65	5	0.66	2	0.65
Perlemuter 1992		46	0.49	39	0.00	59	0.04	54	0.04	17	0.44	38	0.13
Poblocka 1999		10	0.61	24	0.00	17	0.08	16	0.42	17	0.47	16	0.44
Rangell 2001		37	0.54	44	0.00	39	0.07	36	0.07	24	0.44	33	0.18
Richter 1960		36	0.54	16	0.00	43	0.06	46	0.06	28	0.25	42	0.12
Richter 1961		16	0.60	3	0.03	5	0.19	11	0.48	9	0.58	9	0.53
Rosen 1989		43	0.51	50	0.00	60	0.05	51	0.05	35	0.09	52	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		54	0.45	26	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	46	0.05	57	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		50	0.48	33	0.00	22	0.09	28	0.23	22	0.29	26	0.26
Rubinstein 1966		6	0.63	2	0.04	2	0.29	2	0.66	4	0.63	3	0.64
Rudanovskaya 2007		20	0.59	45	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.06	26	0.21	46	0.11
Shebanova 2002		22	0.58	19	0.00	33	0.05	33	0.11	29	0.19	36	0.14
Smith 1975		55	0.45	43	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	49	0.06	56	0.05
Sztompka 1959		45	0.50	57	0.00	36	0.06	44	0.06	26	0.27	40	0.13
Tanyel 1992		51	0.47	40	0.00	40	0.05	49	0.05	29	0.19	48	0.10
Tsujii 2005		17	0.59	51	0.00	24	0.06	23	0.28	32	0.13	32	0.19
Uninsky 1959		44	0.51	61	0.00	49	0.04	58	0.04	37	0.07	58	0.05
Vardi 1988		38	0.53	21	0.00	18	0.09	19	0.35	18	0.46	18	0.40
Wasowski 1980		57	0.42	9	0.01	62	0.03	62	0.03	48	0.06	61	0.04
Zimerman 1975		30	0.57	8	0.01	16	0.09	21	0.33	9	0.61	15	0.45
Average		1	0.76	1	0.77	1	0.76	1	0.89	15	0.39	5	0.59
Random 1		65	0.12	56	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	3	0.49	44	0.12
Random 2		66	0.05	58	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	17	0.38	49	0.09
Random 3		67	-0.03	66	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	55	0.03	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).