Hatto 1997

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		63	0.32	17	0.00	10	0.14	9	0.54	6	0.62	9	0.58
Ax 1995		58	0.44	8	0.00	45	0.05	47	0.05	28	0.28	39	0.12
Bacha 1998		51	0.51	24	0.00	29	0.09	31	0.15	10	0.52	29	0.28
Barbosa 1983		57	0.45	18	0.00	12	0.15	14	0.47	8	0.61	11	0.54
BenOr 1989		14	0.61	51	0.00	21	0.09	18	0.43	23	0.41	19	0.42
Biret 1990		43	0.54	9	0.00	52	0.06	38	0.06	43	0.06	50	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		62	0.37	38	0.00	61	0.05	53	0.05	42	0.07	46	0.06
Chiu 1999		30	0.57	3	0.00	27	0.09	27	0.25	21	0.36	27	0.30
Clidat 1994		52	0.51	39	0.00	34	0.05	43	0.05	20	0.37	33	0.14
Cohen 1997		64	0.26	6	0.00	64	0.03	65	0.03	49	0.04	65	0.03
Cortot 1951		15	0.61	11	0.00	39	0.05	46	0.05	37	0.06	56	0.05
Csalog 1996		4	0.70	23	0.00	4	0.31	4	0.71	10	0.53	7	0.61
Czerny 1989		28	0.58	21	0.00	16	0.09	15	0.47	17	0.47	16	0.47
Ezaki 2006		34	0.56	58	0.00	26	0.08	24	0.28	23	0.35	26	0.31
Falvay 1989		5	0.70	12	0.00	7	0.19	5	0.68	14	0.42	13	0.53
Fiorentino 1962		37	0.55	32	0.00	44	0.06	37	0.06	47	0.06	49	0.06
Fliere 1977		9	0.66	14	0.00	5	0.17	7	0.66	6	0.66	4	0.66
Fou 1978		12	0.62	52	0.00	11	0.12	11	0.53	12	0.50	14	0.51
Francois 1956		54	0.46	20	0.00	62	0.03	62	0.03	56	0.04	66	0.03
Goldenweiser 1946		16	0.61	25	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.37	13	0.45	20	0.41
Gornostaeva 1994		56	0.45	33	0.00	48	0.04	57	0.04	21	0.43	36	0.13
Groot 1988		32	0.57	59	0.00	28	0.10	28	0.24	36	0.08	34	0.14
Hatto 1993		2	0.94	2	0.07	2	0.95	2	0.99	2	0.99	2	0.99
Hatto 1997		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Horszowski 1983		27	0.59	29	0.00	9	0.12	13	0.50	8	0.62	10	0.56
Indjic 2001		1	0.96	1	0.92	1	0.90	1	0.99	2	0.99	1	0.99
Katin 1996		23	0.59	60	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.06	41	0.07	47	0.06
Kiepura 1999		60	0.43	16	0.00	56	0.04	56	0.04	49	0.06	51	0.05
Korecka 1992		11	0.62	26	0.00	38	0.05	48	0.05	9	0.66	31	0.18
Kushner 1990		59	0.43	61	0.00	59	0.05	51	0.05	55	0.04	58	0.04
Lilamand 2001		20	0.60	5	0.00	15	0.09	16	0.46	13	0.63	12	0.54
Luisada 1990		10	0.66	40	0.00	6	0.19	6	0.67	6	0.67	3	0.67
Luisada 2008		38	0.55	30	0.00	25	0.09	25	0.28	14	0.41	23	0.34
Lushtak 2004		18	0.61	10	0.00	22	0.12	20	0.40	25	0.28	24	0.33
Malcuzynski 1951		39	0.54	53	0.00	32	0.05	32	0.10	11	0.52	30	0.23
Malcuzynski 1961		21	0.60	4	0.00	17	0.11	17	0.43	18	0.46	18	0.44
Magaloff 1977		44	0.54	22	0.00	50	0.04	60	0.04	55	0.04	60	0.04
Magin 1975		36	0.55	62	0.00	36	0.05	42	0.05	43	0.06	52	0.05
Meguri 1997		24	0.59	54	0.00	46	0.04	59	0.04	29	0.28	41	0.11
Milkina 1970		46	0.53	63	0.00	57	0.04	54	0.04	57	0.04	57	0.04
Mohovich 1999		41	0.54	36	0.00	54	0.07	34	0.07	63	0.03	54	0.05
Nezu 2005		7	0.67	34	0.00	18	0.09	26	0.27	20	0.37	25	0.32
Ohlsson 1999		48	0.52	55	0.00	49	0.04	58	0.04	37	0.07	53	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		25	0.59	41	0.00	42	0.05	44	0.05	18	0.31	40	0.12
Osinska 1989		13	0.62	64	0.00	47	0.06	36	0.06	47	0.06	45	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		61	0.42	56	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	54	0.03	63	0.03
Poblocka 1999		6	0.69	13	0.00	8	0.22	8	0.61	4	0.67	6	0.64
Rangell 2001		47	0.52	44	0.00	51	0.05	49	0.05	46	0.06	55	0.05
Richter 1960		26	0.59	42	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.06	32	0.21	42	0.11
Richter 1961		45	0.53	45	0.00	43	0.05	52	0.05	28	0.28	37	0.12
Rosen 1989		49	0.52	35	0.00	58	0.03	61	0.03	48	0.06	62	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		17	0.61	31	0.00	13	0.14	10	0.53	6	0.63	8	0.58
Rubinstein 1952		35	0.56	46	0.00	33	0.05	33	0.09	23	0.27	32	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		40	0.54	47	0.00	40	0.04	55	0.04	48	0.05	59	0.04
Rudanovskaya 2007		22	0.60	65	0.00	60	0.05	45	0.05	60	0.03	61	0.04
Shebanova 2002		42	0.54	43	0.00	31	0.08	29	0.17	41	0.06	43	0.10
Smith 1975		33	0.56	66	0.00	41	0.05	50	0.05	23	0.32	35	0.13
Sztompka 1959		53	0.48	19	0.00	55	0.06	40	0.06	52	0.06	48	0.06
Tanyel 1992		55	0.46	27	0.00	53	0.06	35	0.06	23	0.25	38	0.12
Tsujii 2005		8	0.67	28	0.00	14	0.10	12	0.51	23	0.27	22	0.37
Uninsky 1959		19	0.60	48	0.00	24	0.10	23	0.34	14	0.44	21	0.39
Vardi 1988		29	0.58	15	0.00	20	0.11	19	0.42	12	0.57	15	0.49
Wasowski 1980		50	0.52	57	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.17	16	0.51	28	0.29
Zimerman 1975		31	0.57	37	0.00	19	0.09	21	0.37	12	0.57	17	0.46
Average		3	0.81	7	0.00	3	0.69	3	0.89	12	0.47	5	0.65
Random 1		66	0.05	49	0.00	65	0.03	64	0.03	11	0.29	44	0.09
Random 2		65	0.06	67	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	38	0.06	64	0.03
Random 3		67	-0.05	50	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	64	0.02	67	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).