Hatto 1993

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		63	0.32	18	0.00	11	0.09	12	0.51	7	0.61	10	0.56
Ax 1995		57	0.45	21	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.06	24	0.34	34	0.14
Bacha 1998		40	0.55	45	0.00	17	0.09	16	0.48	4	0.62	11	0.55
Barbosa 1983		55	0.46	22	0.00	14	0.13	15	0.48	6	0.61	13	0.54
BenOr 1989		13	0.62	46	0.00	22	0.11	25	0.37	24	0.40	25	0.38
Biret 1990		37	0.56	10	0.00	43	0.06	38	0.06	38	0.06	53	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		62	0.39	39	0.00	60	0.04	58	0.04	53	0.05	60	0.04
Chiu 1999		31	0.58	47	0.00	26	0.13	26	0.34	12	0.43	23	0.38
Clidat 1994		50	0.49	48	0.00	39	0.06	44	0.06	30	0.19	38	0.11
Cohen 1997		64	0.29	32	0.00	62	0.03	62	0.03	43	0.05	63	0.04
Cortot 1951		18	0.60	33	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	22	0.20	39	0.11
Csalog 1996		9	0.66	7	0.00	7	0.17	8	0.59	24	0.36	19	0.46
Czerny 1989		22	0.60	27	0.00	20	0.09	22	0.40	18	0.46	20	0.43
Ezaki 2006		46	0.53	49	0.00	42	0.05	47	0.05	43	0.06	54	0.05
Falvay 1989		4	0.69	3	0.00	8	0.19	6	0.63	19	0.36	16	0.48
Fiorentino 1962		32	0.58	20	0.00	18	0.12	17	0.46	11	0.49	18	0.47
Fliere 1977		7	0.67	40	0.00	5	0.34	5	0.64	4	0.72	4	0.68
Fou 1978		10	0.65	41	0.00	6	0.35	7	0.61	8	0.60	8	0.60
Francois 1956		59	0.43	50	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	46	0.05	65	0.03
Goldenweiser 1946		25	0.59	36	0.00	36	0.06	42	0.06	26	0.24	36	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		54	0.47	51	0.00	48	0.05	55	0.05	22	0.41	35	0.14
Groot 1988		17	0.61	12	0.00	13	0.09	13	0.50	15	0.47	17	0.48
Hatto 1993		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1997		2	0.94	2	0.04	2	0.95	2	0.99	2	0.99	1	0.99
Horszowski 1983		36	0.56	54	0.00	12	0.09	18	0.46	14	0.57	14	0.51
Indjic 2001		1	0.96	1	0.95	1	0.94	1	0.99	1	0.99	2	0.99
Katin 1996		30	0.58	23	0.00	46	0.05	54	0.05	43	0.07	51	0.06
Kiepura 1999		60	0.43	60	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.06	28	0.21	37	0.11
Korecka 1992		12	0.63	52	0.00	27	0.08	29	0.22	6	0.69	22	0.39
Kushner 1990		58	0.44	42	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	58	0.03	64	0.03
Lilamand 2001		35	0.56	17	0.00	29	0.10	28	0.23	22	0.47	28	0.33
Luisada 1990		5	0.68	11	0.00	4	0.29	4	0.65	3	0.71	5	0.68
Luisada 2008		41	0.55	55	0.00	33	0.07	33	0.13	15	0.41	31	0.23
Lushtak 2004		23	0.59	28	0.00	23	0.11	24	0.38	18	0.36	26	0.37
Malcuzynski 1951		49	0.50	43	0.00	55	0.05	57	0.05	47	0.05	59	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		14	0.61	29	0.00	21	0.10	20	0.43	20	0.44	21	0.43
Magaloff 1977		38	0.55	13	0.00	47	0.06	41	0.06	49	0.05	57	0.05
Magin 1975		29	0.58	37	0.00	24	0.12	23	0.40	27	0.30	27	0.35
Meguri 1997		33	0.57	56	0.00	53	0.05	48	0.05	30	0.21	41	0.10
Milkina 1970		42	0.54	61	0.00	57	0.07	37	0.07	59	0.04	55	0.05
Mohovich 1999		28	0.58	19	0.00	37	0.08	35	0.08	37	0.07	49	0.07
Nezu 2005		11	0.63	14	0.00	44	0.05	50	0.05	28	0.19	42	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		51	0.48	62	0.00	54	0.05	53	0.05	47	0.05	56	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		19	0.60	30	0.00	28	0.08	27	0.23	11	0.44	29	0.32
Osinska 1989		21	0.60	34	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	36	0.07	50	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		61	0.43	35	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	59	0.03	66	0.02
Poblocka 1999		6	0.67	5	0.00	9	0.13	9	0.59	7	0.65	6	0.62
Rangell 2001		47	0.52	24	0.00	50	0.05	46	0.05	49	0.05	58	0.05
Richter 1960		27	0.59	16	0.00	30	0.07	31	0.15	29	0.24	32	0.19
Richter 1961		26	0.59	57	0.00	25	0.14	21	0.41	7	0.59	15	0.49
Rosen 1989		53	0.47	44	0.00	61	0.03	61	0.03	50	0.05	62	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		15	0.61	25	0.00	19	0.16	11	0.52	7	0.61	9	0.56
Rubinstein 1952		43	0.54	53	0.00	35	0.05	49	0.05	24	0.26	40	0.11
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.55	58	0.00	38	0.09	34	0.09	49	0.05	47	0.07
Rudanovskaya 2007		16	0.61	15	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	53	0.04	61	0.04
Shebanova 2002		44	0.54	63	0.00	34	0.06	39	0.06	40	0.06	52	0.06
Smith 1975		45	0.54	64	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	32	0.14	44	0.08
Sztompka 1959		52	0.48	59	0.00	58	0.08	36	0.08	37	0.07	46	0.07
Tanyel 1992		56	0.45	38	0.00	51	0.04	59	0.04	27	0.20	43	0.09
Tsujii 2005		8	0.67	9	0.00	15	0.11	14	0.49	22	0.29	24	0.38
Uninsky 1959		34	0.56	26	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.14	31	0.16	33	0.15
Vardi 1988		20	0.60	31	0.00	16	0.10	19	0.46	8	0.64	12	0.54
Wasowski 1980		48	0.52	4	0.00	31	0.06	30	0.15	14	0.52	30	0.28
Zimerman 1975		24	0.59	8	0.00	10	0.11	10	0.54	5	0.68	7	0.61
Average		3	0.81	6	0.00	3	0.71	3	0.91	6	0.53	3	0.69
Random 1		66	0.06	65	0.00	64	0.02	63	0.02	14	0.28	48	0.07
Random 2		65	0.10	66	0.00	63	0.02	64	0.02	21	0.32	45	0.08
Random 3		67	-0.02	67	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	48	0.03	67	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).