Groot 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.20	59	0.00	43	0.05	51	0.05	43	0.06	59	0.05
Ax 1995		63	0.32	22	0.00	64	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.03	65	0.03
Bacha 1998		60	0.44	19	0.00	60	0.04	58	0.04	53	0.04	63	0.04
Barbosa 1983		62	0.38	56	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.07	40	0.08	51	0.07
BenOr 1989		17	0.61	31	0.00	14	0.15	12	0.50	10	0.57	14	0.53
Biret 1990		10	0.63	43	0.00	10	0.17	10	0.56	9	0.62	8	0.59
Brailowsky 1960		55	0.46	44	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	30	0.22	47	0.09
Chiu 1999		39	0.55	30	0.00	39	0.08	35	0.08	23	0.29	35	0.15
Clidat 1994		38	0.55	34	0.00	28	0.08	30	0.19	13	0.48	29	0.30
Cohen 1997		57	0.45	37	0.00	59	0.05	46	0.05	14	0.58	34	0.17
Cortot 1951		40	0.54	52	0.00	55	0.05	53	0.05	33	0.10	54	0.07
Csalog 1996		4	0.66	13	0.01	7	0.18	9	0.56	18	0.48	15	0.52
Czerny 1989		16	0.61	16	0.00	5	0.21	7	0.59	7	0.59	7	0.59
Ezaki 2006		48	0.48	66	0.00	49	0.04	59	0.04	48	0.05	61	0.04
Falvay 1989		3	0.66	7	0.01	3	0.14	2	0.67	5	0.57	6	0.62
Fiorentino 1962		12	0.62	35	0.00	16	0.07	21	0.39	18	0.43	21	0.41
Fliere 1977		37	0.55	50	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.05	26	0.19	45	0.10
Fou 1978		36	0.55	12	0.01	37	0.07	38	0.07	31	0.18	42	0.11
Francois 1956		56	0.46	63	0.00	61	0.03	62	0.03	41	0.07	60	0.05
Goldenweiser 1946		24	0.60	20	0.00	23	0.10	16	0.46	9	0.53	18	0.49
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.40	64	0.00	57	0.05	54	0.05	25	0.32	41	0.13
Groot 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1993		18	0.61	39	0.00	18	0.09	15	0.47	13	0.50	19	0.48
Hatto 1997		30	0.57	67	0.00	34	0.08	36	0.08	28	0.24	39	0.14
Horszowski 1983		44	0.53	38	0.00	27	0.13	26	0.29	22	0.44	27	0.36
Indjic 2001		20	0.60	41	0.00	24	0.09	20	0.40	21	0.43	20	0.41
Katin 1996		2	0.68	24	0.00	2	0.16	3	0.65	2	0.67	2	0.66
Kiepura 1999		35	0.55	11	0.01	47	0.06	41	0.06	23	0.34	37	0.14
Korecka 1992		52	0.47	58	0.00	63	0.03	64	0.03	34	0.09	56	0.05
Kushner 1990		59	0.44	60	0.00	58	0.05	49	0.05	50	0.05	58	0.05
Lilamand 2001		25	0.60	33	0.00	12	0.13	11	0.51	15	0.60	10	0.55
Luisada 1990		42	0.54	36	0.00	21	0.08	22	0.39	23	0.36	26	0.37
Luisada 2008		53	0.46	45	0.00	48	0.05	47	0.05	31	0.12	50	0.08
Lushtak 2004		9	0.63	14	0.01	13	0.12	13	0.50	6	0.59	12	0.54
Malcuzynski 1951		49	0.48	25	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	17	0.45	36	0.15
Malcuzynski 1961		8	0.64	10	0.01	9	0.11	8	0.57	2	0.59	9	0.58
Magaloff 1977		27	0.59	23	0.00	19	0.11	14	0.48	7	0.61	11	0.54
Magin 1975		23	0.60	9	0.01	20	0.08	24	0.32	22	0.36	28	0.34
Meguri 1997		19	0.61	5	0.01	32	0.08	32	0.17	14	0.49	31	0.29
Milkina 1970		28	0.59	29	0.00	35	0.07	40	0.07	24	0.18	43	0.11
Mohovich 1999		5	0.65	17	0.00	8	0.25	5	0.62	5	0.67	5	0.64
Nezu 2005		33	0.56	49	0.00	46	0.06	42	0.06	34	0.08	52	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		45	0.49	27	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	49	0.05	57	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		26	0.59	40	0.00	25	0.09	25	0.30	8	0.51	25	0.39
Osinska 1989		15	0.61	53	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.17	26	0.30	32	0.23
Perlemuter 1992		13	0.62	6	0.01	30	0.07	29	0.19	1	0.79	23	0.39
Poblocka 1999		32	0.56	47	0.00	36	0.07	39	0.07	32	0.15	46	0.10
Rangell 2001		43	0.54	61	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.05	30	0.37	40	0.14
Richter 1960		7	0.64	3	0.02	6	0.19	6	0.60	3	0.71	4	0.65
Richter 1961		41	0.54	8	0.01	38	0.09	34	0.09	20	0.45	33	0.20
Rosen 1989		22	0.60	15	0.01	33	0.07	33	0.14	14	0.63	30	0.30
Rubinstein 1939		54	0.46	57	0.00	53	0.04	55	0.04	52	0.04	62	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		31	0.56	32	0.00	15	0.09	17	0.46	8	0.56	16	0.51
Rubinstein 1966		6	0.64	18	0.00	4	0.16	4	0.64	3	0.66	3	0.65
Rudanovskaya 2007		11	0.63	51	0.00	17	0.08	18	0.45	5	0.63	13	0.53
Shebanova 2002		14	0.61	2	0.02	11	0.12	19	0.45	11	0.55	17	0.50
Smith 1975		34	0.56	4	0.02	26	0.10	27	0.28	10	0.53	24	0.39
Sztompka 1959		58	0.45	65	0.00	62	0.03	63	0.03	59	0.05	64	0.04
Tanyel 1992		51	0.47	28	0.00	50	0.04	56	0.04	24	0.22	49	0.09
Tsujii 2005		21	0.60	54	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.20	41	0.06	44	0.11
Uninsky 1959		29	0.57	42	0.00	42	0.05	50	0.05	30	0.16	48	0.09
Vardi 1988		46	0.49	21	0.00	22	0.08	23	0.34	19	0.46	22	0.40
Wasowski 1980		50	0.48	26	0.00	51	0.04	57	0.04	19	0.48	38	0.14
Zimerman 1975		47	0.48	48	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.06	35	0.09	53	0.07
Average		1	0.78	1	0.78	1	0.76	1	0.87	7	0.53	1	0.68
Random 1		65	0.03	62	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	50	0.03	67	0.02
Random 2		66	0.00	46	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	43	0.04	66	0.02
Random 3		67	-0.01	55	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	24	0.17	55	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).