Fiorentino 1962

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.28	13	0.01	9	0.12	21	0.41	14	0.53	13	0.47
Ax 1995		52	0.46	28	0.00	37	0.08	39	0.08	19	0.44	35	0.19
Bacha 1998		50	0.47	14	0.01	40	0.07	41	0.07	18	0.31	37	0.15
Barbosa 1983		54	0.45	12	0.01	16	0.10	19	0.43	14	0.59	9	0.50
BenOr 1989		14	0.62	25	0.00	22	0.08	9	0.51	20	0.45	12	0.48
Biret 1990		19	0.59	21	0.00	23	0.09	23	0.40	14	0.49	19	0.44
Brailowsky 1960		60	0.39	44	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	35	0.09	46	0.07
Chiu 1999		44	0.52	50	0.00	52	0.06	50	0.06	40	0.07	47	0.06
Clidat 1994		39	0.54	7	0.02	38	0.10	34	0.10	24	0.31	36	0.18
Cohen 1997		46	0.51	30	0.00	36	0.08	40	0.08	1	0.79	31	0.25
Cortot 1951		41	0.53	56	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	54	0.04	64	0.04
Csalog 1996		27	0.57	45	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.14	51	0.05	44	0.08
Czerny 1989		49	0.49	42	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.06	52	0.05	54	0.05
Ezaki 2006		26	0.57	16	0.00	24	0.09	25	0.35	18	0.40	25	0.37
Falvay 1989		7	0.65	17	0.00	14	0.10	8	0.52	26	0.24	26	0.35
Fiorentino 1962		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fliere 1977		23	0.58	52	0.00	28	0.08	28	0.20	11	0.46	29	0.30
Fou 1978		13	0.62	9	0.02	6	0.17	5	0.56	10	0.56	5	0.56
Francois 1956		62	0.36	65	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	60	0.03	67	0.02
Goldenweiser 1946		31	0.56	37	0.00	43	0.06	44	0.06	34	0.09	45	0.07
Gornostaeva 1994		55	0.44	35	0.00	42	0.08	38	0.08	17	0.48	34	0.20
Groot 1988		11	0.62	10	0.01	11	0.10	18	0.43	21	0.39	23	0.41
Hatto 1993		21	0.58	6	0.03	8	0.12	11	0.49	17	0.46	14	0.47
Hatto 1997		32	0.55	40	0.00	39	0.06	47	0.06	37	0.06	50	0.06
Horszowski 1983		30	0.56	41	0.00	19	0.10	26	0.34	16	0.54	20	0.43
Indjic 2001		18	0.60	26	0.00	10	0.12	15	0.46	20	0.43	18	0.44
Katin 1996		6	0.65	8	0.02	13	0.09	6	0.55	15	0.50	8	0.52
Kiepura 1999		2	0.69	3	0.06	2	0.37	2	0.73	1	0.85	1	0.79
Korecka 1992		20	0.59	47	0.00	31	0.08	31	0.17	12	0.61	28	0.32
Kushner 1990		58	0.42	62	0.00	58	0.05	55	0.05	43	0.06	56	0.05
Lilamand 2001		42	0.53	43	0.00	45	0.09	36	0.09	33	0.19	39	0.13
Luisada 1990		36	0.54	5	0.05	7	0.15	12	0.48	19	0.42	16	0.45
Luisada 2008		59	0.41	61	0.00	59	0.05	52	0.05	41	0.06	58	0.05
Lushtak 2004		4	0.67	11	0.01	5	0.19	3	0.67	3	0.66	3	0.66
Malcuzynski 1951		63	0.33	59	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	63	0.02	66	0.02
Malcuzynski 1961		22	0.58	24	0.00	34	0.06	45	0.06	42	0.06	49	0.06
Magaloff 1977		40	0.54	57	0.00	41	0.09	35	0.09	24	0.23	38	0.14
Magin 1975		17	0.61	19	0.00	15	0.09	7	0.54	11	0.50	7	0.52
Meguri 1997		10	0.63	18	0.00	29	0.08	29	0.19	9	0.60	27	0.34
Milkina 1970		8	0.63	20	0.00	25	0.13	22	0.40	16	0.44	22	0.42
Mohovich 1999		15	0.62	32	0.00	18	0.08	13	0.48	20	0.48	11	0.48
Nezu 2005		25	0.57	46	0.00	47	0.05	51	0.05	44	0.06	59	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		48	0.50	31	0.00	51	0.05	57	0.05	45	0.05	55	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		3	0.69	4	0.06	4	0.18	4	0.65	3	0.75	2	0.70
Osinska 1989		5	0.66	36	0.00	26	0.13	24	0.40	18	0.47	21	0.43
Perlemuter 1992		51	0.46	27	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	50	0.04	65	0.03
Poblocka 1999		24	0.58	48	0.00	35	0.08	37	0.08	30	0.18	41	0.12
Rangell 2001		33	0.55	60	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.12	28	0.41	32	0.22
Richter 1960		47	0.50	66	0.00	53	0.06	46	0.06	48	0.05	57	0.05
Richter 1961		9	0.63	2	0.07	3	0.24	14	0.48	5	0.61	6	0.54
Rosen 1989		35	0.55	38	0.00	50	0.04	59	0.04	40	0.08	51	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		53	0.45	34	0.00	54	0.06	48	0.06	47	0.05	53	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		57	0.43	22	0.00	57	0.05	56	0.05	48	0.06	60	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		28	0.57	23	0.00	20	0.13	16	0.44	23	0.34	24	0.39
Rudanovskaya 2007		16	0.61	39	0.00	30	0.08	30	0.17	25	0.24	33	0.20
Shebanova 2002		45	0.52	15	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	60	0.04	63	0.04
Smith 1975		56	0.44	58	0.00	62	0.03	62	0.03	51	0.06	62	0.04
Sztompka 1959		43	0.52	67	0.00	48	0.07	42	0.07	31	0.17	43	0.11
Tanyel 1992		37	0.54	29	0.00	27	0.14	27	0.33	13	0.65	15	0.46
Tsujii 2005		12	0.62	49	0.00	21	0.09	17	0.44	31	0.15	30	0.26
Uninsky 1959		34	0.55	54	0.00	46	0.06	49	0.06	38	0.07	48	0.06
Vardi 1988		38	0.54	63	0.00	12	0.10	10	0.51	7	0.65	4	0.58
Wasowski 1980		61	0.39	55	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	51	0.05	61	0.04
Zimerman 1975		29	0.57	33	0.00	17	0.08	20	0.42	10	0.60	10	0.50
Average		1	0.77	1	0.57	1	0.56	1	0.82	23	0.24	17	0.44
Random 1		65	0.12	64	0.00	60	0.03	61	0.03	1	0.56	40	0.13
Random 2		66	0.08	51	0.00	61	0.03	63	0.03	3	0.52	42	0.12
Random 3		67	0.00	53	0.00	65	0.03	65	0.03	29	0.13	52	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).