Clidat 1994

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		61	0.30	63	0.00	36	0.07	40	0.07	31	0.27	31	0.14
Ax 1995		52	0.41	30	0.00	46	0.06	43	0.06	34	0.07	50	0.06
Bacha 1998		58	0.38	36	0.00	59	0.05	54	0.05	50	0.05	52	0.05
Barbosa 1983		26	0.49	3	0.05	9	0.16	7	0.59	18	0.54	4	0.56
BenOr 1989		53	0.40	55	0.00	57	0.04	60	0.04	50	0.04	64	0.04
Biret 1990		15	0.53	18	0.00	12	0.15	12	0.52	22	0.38	12	0.44
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.40	39	0.00	42	0.07	37	0.07	28	0.27	28	0.14
Chiu 1999		23	0.50	20	0.00	33	0.08	31	0.16	51	0.05	39	0.09
Clidat 1994		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cohen 1997		63	0.27	66	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	55	0.04	65	0.03
Cortot 1951		44	0.44	21	0.00	53	0.06	47	0.06	41	0.05	57	0.05
Csalog 1996		11	0.54	34	0.00	14	0.12	14	0.48	38	0.07	23	0.18
Czerny 1989		35	0.47	42	0.00	25	0.08	21	0.36	38	0.07	27	0.16
Ezaki 2006		27	0.48	9	0.01	30	0.08	32	0.15	38	0.07	37	0.10
Falvay 1989		3	0.58	2	0.10	2	0.26	4	0.65	15	0.37	7	0.49
Fiorentino 1962		12	0.54	4	0.03	16	0.10	24	0.31	34	0.10	24	0.18
Fliere 1977		42	0.45	44	0.00	49	0.06	48	0.06	42	0.07	45	0.06
Fou 1978		46	0.43	28	0.00	54	0.04	57	0.04	53	0.05	60	0.04
Francois 1956		30	0.48	22	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.06	20	0.50	26	0.17
Goldenweiser 1946		17	0.51	25	0.00	20	0.11	17	0.39	18	0.34	15	0.36
Gornostaeva 1994		64	0.26	51	0.00	62	0.03	62	0.03	50	0.06	63	0.04
Groot 1988		8	0.55	46	0.00	13	0.09	13	0.48	30	0.19	19	0.30
Hatto 1993		25	0.49	40	0.00	31	0.06	30	0.19	44	0.06	36	0.11
Hatto 1997		20	0.51	56	0.00	21	0.10	20	0.37	43	0.05	29	0.14
Horszowski 1983		45	0.44	59	0.00	26	0.10	25	0.28	30	0.19	21	0.23
Indjic 2001		22	0.50	62	0.00	28	0.08	28	0.25	45	0.06	35	0.12
Katin 1996		10	0.54	19	0.00	10	0.16	9	0.57	23	0.37	11	0.46
Kiepura 1999		33	0.47	37	0.00	38	0.06	51	0.06	30	0.16	38	0.10
Korecka 1992		50	0.41	23	0.00	60	0.04	58	0.04	35	0.07	53	0.05
Kushner 1990		43	0.44	48	0.00	37	0.06	45	0.06	33	0.14	40	0.09
Lilamand 2001		51	0.41	54	0.00	32	0.07	33	0.13	44	0.06	41	0.09
Luisada 1990		55	0.40	47	0.00	50	0.06	44	0.06	57	0.05	56	0.05
Luisada 2008		48	0.42	52	0.00	48	0.05	52	0.05	43	0.06	55	0.05
Lushtak 2004		9	0.55	5	0.03	6	0.20	10	0.56	15	0.44	6	0.50
Malcuzynski 1951		62	0.29	64	0.00	65	0.02	66	0.02	59	0.04	66	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		40	0.46	14	0.01	51	0.08	35	0.08	51	0.05	46	0.06
Magaloff 1977		49	0.41	53	0.00	55	0.05	53	0.05	54	0.04	61	0.04
Magin 1975		37	0.47	67	0.00	39	0.06	42	0.06	53	0.05	51	0.05
Meguri 1997		16	0.52	16	0.00	17	0.11	16	0.45	12	0.51	10	0.48
Milkina 1970		2	0.60	6	0.02	3	0.27	3	0.66	10	0.62	1	0.64
Mohovich 1999		31	0.48	50	0.00	41	0.07	38	0.07	46	0.05	49	0.06
Nezu 2005		18	0.51	49	0.00	35	0.10	34	0.10	31	0.15	34	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		6	0.56	11	0.01	4	0.20	5	0.63	14	0.55	2	0.59
Olejniczak 1990		36	0.47	10	0.01	52	0.05	55	0.05	50	0.05	58	0.05
Osinska 1989		19	0.51	13	0.01	24	0.08	23	0.31	29	0.22	20	0.26
Perlemuter 1992		57	0.39	31	0.00	61	0.03	61	0.03	43	0.05	59	0.04
Poblocka 1999		5	0.56	26	0.00	7	0.24	8	0.58	19	0.45	5	0.51
Rangell 2001		32	0.47	60	0.00	27	0.09	22	0.33	25	0.42	14	0.37
Richter 1960		41	0.45	45	0.00	45	0.06	50	0.06	52	0.05	54	0.05
Richter 1961		28	0.48	32	0.00	34	0.08	36	0.08	39	0.07	43	0.07
Rosen 1989		29	0.48	41	0.00	43	0.06	46	0.06	30	0.35	30	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		39	0.46	58	0.00	29	0.08	29	0.21	34	0.07	33	0.12
Rubinstein 1952		34	0.47	12	0.01	18	0.10	19	0.38	26	0.26	17	0.31
Rubinstein 1966		4	0.58	7	0.02	5	0.25	2	0.72	16	0.46	3	0.58
Rudanovskaya 2007		21	0.51	24	0.00	22	0.08	26	0.28	15	0.41	16	0.34
Shebanova 2002		7	0.56	17	0.00	8	0.16	6	0.59	21	0.40	8	0.49
Smith 1975		24	0.50	29	0.00	19	0.10	18	0.38	17	0.43	13	0.40
Sztompka 1959		38	0.46	15	0.01	23	0.07	27	0.25	21	0.37	18	0.30
Tanyel 1992		60	0.35	61	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	42	0.08	48	0.06
Tsujii 2005		13	0.54	27	0.00	15	0.13	15	0.47	46	0.06	25	0.17
Uninsky 1959		14	0.54	8	0.02	11	0.13	11	0.53	15	0.43	9	0.48
Vardi 1988		47	0.43	33	0.00	44	0.07	39	0.07	45	0.06	47	0.06
Wasowski 1980		54	0.40	38	0.00	47	0.06	49	0.06	26	0.26	32	0.12
Zimerman 1975		59	0.37	43	0.00	58	0.05	56	0.05	55	0.04	62	0.04
Average		1	0.66	1	0.62	1	0.61	1	0.85	45	0.06	22	0.23
Random 1		66	0.02	35	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	38	0.05	67	0.02
Random 2		65	0.06	65	0.00	66	0.02	64	0.02	23	0.26	44	0.07
Random 3		67	0.01	57	0.00	64	0.02	65	0.02	15	0.38	42	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).