Zimerman 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		51	0.38	14	0.01	6	0.16	12	0.53	10	0.58	8	0.55
Ax 1995		29	0.48	7	0.02	7	0.16	15	0.50	9	0.59	9	0.54
Bacha 1998		55	0.35	53	0.00	44	0.06	45	0.06	41	0.05	49	0.05
Barbosa 1983		41	0.43	24	0.00	15	0.10	20	0.44	22	0.37	15	0.40
BenOr 1989		28	0.48	50	0.00	29	0.10	29	0.24	37	0.08	33	0.14
Biret 1990		15	0.52	27	0.00	18	0.10	17	0.46	25	0.29	16	0.37
Brailowsky 1960		60	0.29	39	0.00	58	0.05	47	0.05	50	0.05	48	0.05
Chiu 1999		48	0.40	47	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	53	0.05	57	0.04
Clidat 1994		53	0.37	40	0.00	49	0.04	54	0.04	55	0.05	58	0.04
Cohen 1997		57	0.34	21	0.01	50	0.05	50	0.05	27	0.30	35	0.12
Cortot 1951		18	0.50	44	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.13	24	0.19	27	0.16
Csalog 1996		27	0.48	19	0.01	33	0.07	39	0.07	57	0.04	52	0.05
Czerny 1989		21	0.50	9	0.01	23	0.09	25	0.33	32	0.17	24	0.24
Ezaki 2006		24	0.49	16	0.01	20	0.11	21	0.40	31	0.20	22	0.28
Falvay 1989		1	0.61	2	0.18	2	0.29	2	0.75	12	0.45	6	0.58
Fiorentino 1962		11	0.57	18	0.01	11	0.21	9	0.60	19	0.42	10	0.50
Fliere 1977		25	0.49	12	0.01	22	0.12	19	0.45	21	0.27	18	0.35
Fou 1978		17	0.51	28	0.00	14	0.10	14	0.52	25	0.23	19	0.35
Francois 1956		62	0.28	48	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	62	0.02	66	0.02
Goldenweiser 1946		46	0.41	58	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	50	0.05	47	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		47	0.40	35	0.00	42	0.07	38	0.07	25	0.29	32	0.14
Groot 1988		26	0.48	34	0.00	37	0.09	34	0.09	42	0.06	40	0.07
Hatto 1993		4	0.59	4	0.09	4	0.22	4	0.68	9	0.54	5	0.61
Hatto 1997		8	0.57	15	0.01	12	0.14	11	0.57	20	0.37	13	0.46
Horszowski 1983		19	0.50	6	0.04	24	0.09	24	0.33	25	0.38	17	0.35
Indjic 2001		6	0.58	32	0.00	8	0.17	5	0.64	9	0.51	7	0.57
Katin 1996		22	0.50	41	0.00	28	0.10	26	0.30	39	0.08	28	0.15
Kiepura 1999		31	0.47	46	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.26	23	0.32	21	0.29
Korecka 1992		3	0.59	11	0.01	10	0.18	6	0.63	2	0.75	3	0.69
Kushner 1990		63	0.28	63	0.00	60	0.03	61	0.03	63	0.02	64	0.02
Lilamand 2001		12	0.54	13	0.01	16	0.12	13	0.53	22	0.46	12	0.49
Luisada 1990		23	0.49	59	0.00	21	0.10	18	0.46	53	0.05	29	0.15
Luisada 2008		33	0.47	29	0.00	30	0.10	30	0.21	32	0.10	31	0.14
Lushtak 2004		10	0.57	20	0.01	13	0.15	8	0.61	20	0.33	14	0.45
Malcuzynski 1951		58	0.34	62	0.00	59	0.03	60	0.03	57	0.04	62	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		35	0.46	42	0.00	40	0.09	36	0.09	56	0.04	41	0.06
Magaloff 1977		52	0.38	45	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.03	61	0.03
Magin 1975		5	0.58	17	0.01	9	0.21	10	0.59	17	0.41	11	0.49
Meguri 1997		20	0.50	33	0.00	26	0.09	28	0.25	25	0.30	23	0.27
Milkina 1970		44	0.41	54	0.00	51	0.04	55	0.04	59	0.03	60	0.03
Mohovich 1999		30	0.47	60	0.00	34	0.07	41	0.07	47	0.05	44	0.06
Nezu 2005		16	0.52	10	0.01	31	0.08	31	0.17	31	0.13	30	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		50	0.38	25	0.00	53	0.05	52	0.05	54	0.05	51	0.05
Olejniczak 1990		32	0.47	65	0.00	38	0.10	33	0.10	27	0.18	34	0.13
Osinska 1989		13	0.53	23	0.00	25	0.13	23	0.35	26	0.28	20	0.31
Perlemuter 1992		45	0.41	37	0.00	48	0.04	57	0.04	28	0.15	37	0.08
Poblocka 1999		42	0.42	55	0.00	52	0.05	51	0.05	57	0.04	56	0.04
Rangell 2001		43	0.42	52	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.06	41	0.06	45	0.06
Richter 1960		38	0.44	22	0.01	39	0.09	35	0.09	42	0.06	39	0.07
Richter 1961		2	0.61	1	0.31	1	0.30	1	0.75	1	0.71	2	0.73
Rosen 1989		39	0.43	26	0.00	43	0.07	40	0.07	33	0.09	38	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		40	0.43	5	0.04	19	0.11	22	0.36	29	0.15	25	0.23
Rubinstein 1952		54	0.37	64	0.00	54	0.04	56	0.04	52	0.05	59	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		37	0.45	56	0.00	36	0.07	37	0.07	52	0.05	43	0.06
Rudanovskaya 2007		36	0.45	51	0.00	45	0.06	46	0.06	51	0.04	54	0.05
Shebanova 2002		34	0.47	31	0.00	35	0.06	44	0.06	51	0.05	53	0.05
Smith 1975		61	0.29	49	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	63	0.02	63	0.02
Sztompka 1959		56	0.34	30	0.00	57	0.05	49	0.05	37	0.07	42	0.06
Tanyel 1992		7	0.58	3	0.14	3	0.28	3	0.69	1	0.82	1	0.75
Tsujii 2005		14	0.53	43	0.00	17	0.14	16	0.49	47	0.06	26	0.17
Uninsky 1959		49	0.39	36	0.00	46	0.06	43	0.06	47	0.05	50	0.05
Vardi 1988		9	0.57	8	0.02	5	0.16	7	0.63	8	0.63	4	0.63
Wasowski 1980		59	0.30	38	0.00	61	0.04	53	0.04	42	0.07	46	0.05
Zimerman 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 1		64	0.07	61	0.00	62	0.03	62	0.03	10	0.30	36	0.09
Random 2		66	0.00	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	54	0.03	65	0.02
Random 3		65	0.00	57	0.00	63	0.02	63	0.02	24	0.15	55	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).