Tsujii 2005

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		63	0.31	3	0.12	4	0.24	5	0.56	3	0.70	5	0.63
Ax 1995		49	0.54	13	0.01	8	0.24	8	0.53	2	0.73	7	0.62
Bacha 1998		56	0.50	31	0.00	58	0.03	63	0.03	31	0.13	58	0.06
Barbosa 1983		62	0.40	37	0.00	34	0.07	41	0.07	30	0.18	52	0.11
BenOr 1989		23	0.64	28	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.11	20	0.42	32	0.21
Biret 1990		18	0.65	35	0.00	16	0.13	14	0.42	7	0.62	11	0.51
Brailowsky 1960		59	0.47	47	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	32	0.18	56	0.08
Chiu 1999		45	0.56	36	0.00	49	0.05	49	0.05	45	0.06	62	0.05
Clidat 1994		48	0.54	38	0.00	35	0.06	45	0.06	14	0.47	36	0.17
Cohen 1997		61	0.43	46	0.00	53	0.04	61	0.04	11	0.58	40	0.15
Cortot 1951		20	0.65	27	0.00	43	0.07	36	0.07	7	0.47	35	0.18
Csalog 1996		8	0.68	9	0.01	11	0.10	7	0.53	22	0.44	15	0.48
Czerny 1989		41	0.58	58	0.00	33	0.07	38	0.07	23	0.31	39	0.15
Ezaki 2006		25	0.63	26	0.00	9	0.11	13	0.43	5	0.57	12	0.50
Falvay 1989		14	0.67	12	0.01	17	0.13	12	0.44	35	0.10	31	0.21
Fiorentino 1962		28	0.62	48	0.00	28	0.06	30	0.15	16	0.44	29	0.26
Fliere 1977		37	0.59	54	0.00	45	0.06	43	0.06	19	0.30	46	0.13
Fou 1978		30	0.61	17	0.01	38	0.07	35	0.07	20	0.30	43	0.14
Francois 1956		44	0.57	60	0.00	60	0.05	54	0.05	20	0.48	41	0.15
Goldenweiser 1946		34	0.60	34	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	35	0.07	57	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		60	0.45	41	0.00	61	0.04	58	0.04	28	0.25	54	0.10
Groot 1988		33	0.60	59	0.00	37	0.07	40	0.07	27	0.20	49	0.12
Hatto 1993		13	0.67	44	0.00	26	0.07	21	0.29	13	0.49	21	0.38
Hatto 1997		12	0.67	23	0.00	27	0.08	22	0.27	11	0.51	23	0.37
Horszowski 1983		57	0.50	66	0.00	55	0.05	51	0.05	37	0.06	61	0.05
Indjic 2001		7	0.69	61	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.16	12	0.47	27	0.27
Katin 1996		3	0.70	18	0.01	19	0.08	20	0.32	18	0.42	22	0.37
Kiepura 1999		54	0.53	62	0.00	50	0.05	57	0.05	24	0.27	47	0.12
Korecka 1992		40	0.58	50	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	18	0.49	44	0.14
Kushner 1990		51	0.53	51	0.00	54	0.05	55	0.05	34	0.08	60	0.06
Lilamand 2001		43	0.57	63	0.00	46	0.06	44	0.06	26	0.35	45	0.14
Luisada 1990		10	0.67	4	0.10	3	0.24	3	0.69	1	0.73	3	0.71
Luisada 2008		55	0.52	64	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.07	10	0.44	34	0.18
Lushtak 2004		36	0.59	56	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.13	22	0.28	33	0.19
Malcuzynski 1951		46	0.56	29	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	8	0.54	38	0.16
Malcuzynski 1961		38	0.58	19	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	49	0.06	59	0.06
Magaloff 1977		17	0.65	20	0.00	18	0.09	17	0.37	2	0.68	14	0.50
Magin 1975		19	0.65	5	0.06	5	0.16	4	0.59	2	0.64	8	0.61
Meguri 1997		11	0.67	52	0.00	23	0.07	24	0.24	3	0.69	19	0.41
Milkina 1970		22	0.64	42	0.00	44	0.08	33	0.08	29	0.12	53	0.10
Mohovich 1999		31	0.61	7	0.02	42	0.07	39	0.07	26	0.22	48	0.12
Nezu 2005		1	0.75	1	0.30	1	0.30	1	0.72	1	0.84	1	0.78
Ohlsson 1999		24	0.64	16	0.01	13	0.13	11	0.47	3	0.69	9	0.57
Olejniczak 1990		42	0.58	57	0.00	57	0.05	56	0.05	41	0.06	64	0.05
Osinska 1989		5	0.70	32	0.00	25	0.08	23	0.24	16	0.47	24	0.34
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.56	43	0.00	62	0.05	50	0.05	20	0.41	42	0.14
Poblocka 1999		16	0.65	30	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.16	20	0.42	28	0.26
Rangell 2001		2	0.71	2	0.20	2	0.26	2	0.70	3	0.78	2	0.74
Richter 1960		6	0.69	6	0.03	10	0.11	10	0.49	6	0.67	10	0.57
Richter 1961		50	0.53	53	0.00	51	0.06	48	0.06	32	0.19	51	0.11
Rosen 1989		9	0.67	11	0.01	24	0.07	25	0.22	9	0.68	20	0.39
Rubinstein 1939		21	0.64	24	0.00	12	0.10	16	0.38	3	0.65	13	0.50
Rubinstein 1952		53	0.53	40	0.00	41	0.07	42	0.07	31	0.19	50	0.12
Rubinstein 1966		26	0.63	39	0.00	14	0.13	15	0.41	12	0.48	17	0.44
Rudanovskaya 2007		4	0.70	22	0.00	22	0.08	27	0.18	13	0.42	26	0.27
Shebanova 2002		27	0.63	8	0.02	15	0.13	18	0.35	14	0.52	18	0.43
Smith 1975		32	0.60	10	0.01	21	0.07	26	0.20	18	0.42	25	0.29
Sztompka 1959		58	0.47	65	0.00	63	0.03	62	0.03	44	0.06	65	0.04
Tanyel 1992		29	0.62	15	0.01	6	0.16	6	0.55	3	0.80	4	0.66
Tsujii 2005		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Uninsky 1959		15	0.66	21	0.00	20	0.07	19	0.34	8	0.57	16	0.44
Vardi 1988		35	0.60	14	0.01	7	0.19	9	0.53	2	0.72	6	0.62
Wasowski 1980		39	0.58	25	0.00	40	0.07	34	0.07	3	0.69	30	0.22
Zimerman 1975		52	0.53	33	0.00	36	0.06	47	0.06	16	0.49	37	0.17
Random 1		65	0.02	49	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	21	0.14	63	0.05
Random 2		64	0.07	55	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	23	0.25	55	0.09
Random 3		66	-0.04	45	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	56	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).