Perlemuter 1992

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		66	-0.05	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	65	0.02	66	0.01
Ax 1995		60	0.26	43	0.00	50	0.03	50	0.03	63	0.02	63	0.02
Bacha 1998		28	0.48	41	0.00	28	0.09	26	0.21	37	0.06	23	0.11
Barbosa 1983		62	0.21	61	0.00	45	0.07	33	0.07	61	0.03	38	0.05
BenOr 1989		23	0.49	14	0.00	22	0.11	19	0.42	47	0.05	18	0.14
Biret 1990		18	0.51	42	0.00	8	0.13	7	0.52	44	0.06	6	0.18
Brailowsky 1960		58	0.34	33	0.00	62	0.03	54	0.03	60	0.03	51	0.03
Chiu 1999		22	0.49	31	0.00	30	0.07	27	0.19	51	0.05	26	0.10
Clidat 1994		54	0.39	35	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.05	60	0.03	47	0.04
Cohen 1997		59	0.34	37	0.00	52	0.02	60	0.02	53	0.04	56	0.03
Cortot 1951		12	0.54	34	0.00	24	0.11	23	0.31	50	0.04	24	0.11
Csalog 1996		16	0.53	30	0.00	15	0.11	10	0.50	62	0.03	22	0.12
Czerny 1989		55	0.39	62	0.00	36	0.05	44	0.05	59	0.04	42	0.04
Ezaki 2006		56	0.37	32	0.00	48	0.05	48	0.05	64	0.02	49	0.03
Falvay 1989		9	0.55	26	0.00	11	0.12	9	0.51	61	0.04	16	0.14
Fiorentino 1962		30	0.46	13	0.01	49	0.04	49	0.04	63	0.03	57	0.03
Fliere 1977		19	0.51	16	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.25	56	0.04	25	0.10
Fou 1978		35	0.46	10	0.01	41	0.07	35	0.07	59	0.03	37	0.05
Francois 1956		14	0.54	3	0.11	6	0.18	5	0.55	16	0.53	1	0.54
Goldenweiser 1946		34	0.46	49	0.00	39	0.06	36	0.06	63	0.03	40	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.24	44	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	64	0.02	64	0.02
Groot 1988		1	0.62	1	0.28	1	0.28	1	0.79	28	0.19	3	0.39
Hatto 1993		41	0.43	45	0.00	57	0.03	58	0.03	64	0.02	65	0.02
Hatto 1997		42	0.42	57	0.00	61	0.03	53	0.03	62	0.03	54	0.03
Horszowski 1983		26	0.49	47	0.00	9	0.14	11	0.49	47	0.05	7	0.16
Indjic 2001		32	0.46	51	0.00	58	0.03	51	0.03	63	0.02	62	0.02
Katin 1996		5	0.57	54	0.00	23	0.11	22	0.34	59	0.04	21	0.12
Kiepura 1999		43	0.42	29	0.00	54	0.03	59	0.03	57	0.04	50	0.03
Korecka 1992		39	0.43	23	0.00	60	0.03	57	0.03	59	0.04	52	0.03
Kushner 1990		50	0.40	59	0.00	38	0.06	40	0.06	56	0.03	44	0.04
Lilamand 2001		49	0.41	60	0.00	56	0.02	62	0.02	60	0.02	58	0.02
Luisada 1990		57	0.36	38	0.00	59	0.03	55	0.03	64	0.02	60	0.02
Luisada 2008		29	0.47	22	0.00	7	0.20	6	0.53	48	0.05	9	0.16
Lushtak 2004		21	0.49	17	0.00	16	0.12	16	0.44	53	0.04	20	0.13
Malcuzynski 1951		51	0.39	46	0.00	47	0.05	46	0.05	59	0.04	48	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		33	0.46	27	0.00	31	0.06	32	0.12	61	0.03	32	0.06
Magaloff 1977		38	0.45	65	0.00	33	0.05	47	0.05	55	0.04	46	0.04
Magin 1975		37	0.45	64	0.00	34	0.06	37	0.06	63	0.03	41	0.04
Meguri 1997		27	0.48	25	0.00	40	0.05	41	0.05	55	0.04	45	0.04
Milkina 1970		2	0.57	20	0.00	12	0.09	12	0.47	51	0.05	11	0.15
Mohovich 1999		11	0.54	18	0.00	17	0.13	14	0.47	44	0.05	15	0.15
Nezu 2005		10	0.55	21	0.00	13	0.08	15	0.45	50	0.05	14	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		44	0.41	63	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.05	62	0.03	43	0.04
Olejniczak 1990		17	0.52	9	0.01	26	0.07	29	0.15	40	0.06	28	0.09
Osinska 1989		3	0.57	12	0.01	21	0.09	21	0.35	50	0.05	19	0.13
Perlemuter 1992		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Poblocka 1999		36	0.45	56	0.00	44	0.07	34	0.07	62	0.03	35	0.05
Rangell 2001		31	0.46	24	0.00	29	0.07	31	0.13	53	0.05	30	0.08
Richter 1960		6	0.56	5	0.07	3	0.21	3	0.70	26	0.25	2	0.42
Richter 1961		45	0.41	19	0.00	46	0.06	38	0.06	59	0.04	36	0.05
Rosen 1989		20	0.50	39	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.06	45	0.06	34	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		46	0.41	11	0.01	32	0.08	30	0.15	62	0.03	31	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		15	0.53	4	0.10	4	0.30	4	0.61	26	0.25	4	0.39
Rubinstein 1966		24	0.49	6	0.05	5	0.21	8	0.51	55	0.05	8	0.16
Rudanovskaya 2007		4	0.57	8	0.02	20	0.08	24	0.31	63	0.03	27	0.10
Shebanova 2002		7	0.56	2	0.22	2	0.26	2	0.71	31	0.14	5	0.32
Smith 1975		25	0.49	7	0.03	14	0.10	13	0.47	55	0.05	10	0.15
Sztompka 1959		40	0.43	28	0.00	51	0.03	52	0.03	59	0.03	53	0.03
Tanyel 1992		47	0.41	58	0.00	35	0.05	45	0.05	43	0.07	33	0.06
Tsujii 2005		8	0.56	40	0.00	18	0.09	20	0.41	50	0.05	17	0.14
Uninsky 1959		13	0.54	48	0.00	19	0.12	17	0.44	49	0.05	12	0.15
Vardi 1988		52	0.39	55	0.00	10	0.12	18	0.43	50	0.05	13	0.15
Wasowski 1980		53	0.39	50	0.00	53	0.03	56	0.03	55	0.05	39	0.04
Zimerman 1975		48	0.41	15	0.00	27	0.07	28	0.15	57	0.04	29	0.08
Random 1		63	0.00	52	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	58	0.03	61	0.02
Random 2		65	-0.01	53	0.00	63	0.02	63	0.02	57	0.03	59	0.02
Random 3		64	-0.01	36	0.00	55	0.02	61	0.02	37	0.04	55	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).