Magaloff 1977

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		63	0.23	17	0.01	15	0.09	19	0.29	33	0.09	23	0.16
Ax 1995		61	0.35	38	0.00	54	0.04	51	0.04	38	0.06	52	0.05
Bacha 1998		54	0.41	58	0.00	56	0.05	49	0.05	51	0.05	48	0.05
Barbosa 1983		62	0.29	66	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	53	0.06	50	0.05
BenOr 1989		3	0.62	5	0.05	4	0.27	3	0.67	5	0.59	2	0.63
Biret 1990		24	0.55	15	0.01	24	0.07	26	0.21	33	0.09	27	0.14
Brailowsky 1960		49	0.45	34	0.00	40	0.05	46	0.05	20	0.34	30	0.13
Chiu 1999		35	0.51	55	0.00	26	0.06	22	0.23	35	0.08	24	0.14
Clidat 1994		53	0.41	51	0.00	53	0.04	53	0.04	52	0.05	61	0.04
Cohen 1997		58	0.39	56	0.00	52	0.04	52	0.04	20	0.47	25	0.14
Cortot 1951		12	0.58	18	0.01	20	0.07	27	0.19	31	0.10	28	0.14
Csalog 1996		11	0.59	13	0.01	11	0.11	10	0.47	44	0.06	18	0.17
Czerny 1989		45	0.47	57	0.00	44	0.04	50	0.04	49	0.05	57	0.04
Ezaki 2006		37	0.50	40	0.00	34	0.06	39	0.06	46	0.05	45	0.05
Falvay 1989		7	0.61	12	0.01	10	0.12	9	0.52	46	0.05	19	0.16
Fiorentino 1962		27	0.54	47	0.00	27	0.08	23	0.23	34	0.09	26	0.14
Fliere 1977		41	0.48	21	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.06	35	0.08	40	0.07
Fou 1978		22	0.55	44	0.00	19	0.08	21	0.28	34	0.09	20	0.16
Francois 1956		32	0.53	7	0.02	30	0.08	28	0.18	6	0.62	14	0.33
Goldenweiser 1946		23	0.55	28	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.14	30	0.12	29	0.13
Gornostaeva 1994		52	0.43	14	0.01	51	0.04	58	0.04	32	0.15	39	0.08
Groot 1988		10	0.59	16	0.01	5	0.27	6	0.61	13	0.48	7	0.54
Hatto 1993		20	0.55	27	0.00	38	0.05	48	0.05	40	0.06	53	0.05
Hatto 1997		29	0.54	52	0.00	43	0.04	54	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.04
Horszowski 1983		57	0.40	45	0.00	37	0.06	37	0.06	52	0.05	46	0.05
Indjic 2001		16	0.56	63	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.06	41	0.06	44	0.06
Katin 1996		9	0.59	46	0.00	14	0.09	14	0.39	43	0.07	17	0.17
Kiepura 1999		60	0.36	60	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.04
Korecka 1992		47	0.47	53	0.00	61	0.03	62	0.03	47	0.05	56	0.04
Kushner 1990		38	0.50	41	0.00	36	0.06	38	0.06	33	0.12	38	0.08
Lilamand 2001		43	0.48	33	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.16	45	0.06	35	0.10
Luisada 1990		2	0.63	1	0.29	1	0.29	1	0.71	7	0.64	1	0.67
Luisada 2008		48	0.47	36	0.00	29	0.06	30	0.16	29	0.17	22	0.16
Lushtak 2004		42	0.48	62	0.00	48	0.06	36	0.06	49	0.05	51	0.05
Malcuzynski 1951		14	0.56	22	0.00	13	0.11	11	0.46	2	0.64	8	0.54
Malcuzynski 1961		8	0.60	23	0.00	6	0.24	5	0.63	18	0.46	6	0.54
Magaloff 1977		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magin 1975		33	0.53	8	0.02	23	0.06	24	0.23	48	0.05	32	0.11
Meguri 1997		40	0.50	48	0.00	57	0.04	56	0.04	42	0.06	49	0.05
Milkina 1970		17	0.56	37	0.00	39	0.05	44	0.05	42	0.07	42	0.06
Mohovich 1999		34	0.51	65	0.00	35	0.05	47	0.05	52	0.04	62	0.04
Nezu 2005		25	0.54	42	0.00	46	0.06	42	0.06	41	0.07	43	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		44	0.47	35	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.05	57	0.04	59	0.04
Olejniczak 1990		19	0.55	50	0.00	22	0.07	20	0.28	15	0.38	13	0.33
Osinska 1989		26	0.54	43	0.00	47	0.07	35	0.07	56	0.05	41	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		50	0.45	59	0.00	62	0.04	55	0.04	47	0.05	55	0.04
Poblocka 1999		21	0.55	30	0.00	33	0.09	33	0.09	40	0.07	37	0.08
Rangell 2001		6	0.61	4	0.11	7	0.27	7	0.60	12	0.63	4	0.61
Richter 1960		4	0.62	2	0.21	2	0.39	4	0.66	12	0.59	3	0.62
Richter 1961		56	0.40	29	0.00	59	0.03	60	0.03	58	0.04	63	0.03
Rosen 1989		13	0.57	19	0.00	8	0.21	8	0.53	15	0.58	5	0.55
Rubinstein 1939		39	0.50	20	0.00	50	0.07	34	0.07	53	0.04	47	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		46	0.47	49	0.00	31	0.06	32	0.14	46	0.06	36	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		28	0.54	24	0.00	12	0.11	12	0.41	42	0.06	21	0.16
Rudanovskaya 2007		5	0.61	6	0.02	9	0.09	13	0.41	17	0.38	12	0.39
Shebanova 2002		31	0.53	9	0.02	25	0.06	25	0.23	37	0.07	31	0.13
Smith 1975		18	0.55	26	0.00	17	0.08	15	0.35	15	0.44	11	0.39
Sztompka 1959		55	0.40	25	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	47	0.06	58	0.04
Tanyel 1992		51	0.44	54	0.00	49	0.06	41	0.06	29	0.19	33	0.11
Tsujii 2005		1	0.65	3	0.12	3	0.23	2	0.68	17	0.37	9	0.50
Uninsky 1959		15	0.56	10	0.02	21	0.08	16	0.33	28	0.18	16	0.24
Vardi 1988		36	0.51	11	0.02	16	0.07	17	0.33	27	0.19	15	0.25
Wasowski 1980		30	0.53	39	0.00	18	0.08	18	0.30	7	0.59	10	0.42
Zimerman 1975		59	0.38	31	0.00	58	0.03	61	0.03	59	0.04	65	0.03
Random 1		65	0.05	64	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	9	0.38	34	0.11
Random 2		64	0.09	32	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	40	0.06	64	0.03
Random 3		66	0.00	61	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	42	0.04	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).