BenOr 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		64	0.08	61	0.00	51	0.04	52	0.04	55	0.05	61	0.04
Ax 1995		61	0.30	50	0.00	57	0.03	59	0.03	53	0.04	64	0.03
Bacha 1998		59	0.39	43	0.00	61	0.03	60	0.03	40	0.05	57	0.04
Barbosa 1983		57	0.40	44	0.00	39	0.08	38	0.08	45	0.08	42	0.08
BenOr 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Biret 1990		11	0.62	30	0.00	17	0.16	14	0.53	10	0.58	13	0.55
Brailowsky 1960		62	0.27	58	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	63	0.02	66	0.01
Chiu 1999		51	0.43	37	0.00	44	0.07	39	0.07	42	0.07	44	0.07
Clidat 1994		54	0.40	65	0.00	48	0.04	49	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.04
Cohen 1997		49	0.44	40	0.00	42	0.09	36	0.09	6	0.66	30	0.24
Cortot 1951		31	0.56	28	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.05	48	0.04	62	0.04
Csalog 1996		4	0.67	1	0.36	1	0.35	1	0.70	5	0.57	2	0.63
Czerny 1989		27	0.57	27	0.00	15	0.12	18	0.48	11	0.52	17	0.50
Ezaki 2006		29	0.56	31	0.00	29	0.12	27	0.30	15	0.47	26	0.38
Falvay 1989		2	0.68	2	0.13	2	0.31	2	0.68	7	0.52	6	0.59
Fiorentino 1962		14	0.62	17	0.01	20	0.09	19	0.45	8	0.51	20	0.48
Fliere 1977		22	0.60	34	0.00	28	0.09	25	0.33	7	0.55	22	0.43
Fou 1978		8	0.64	18	0.01	8	0.08	8	0.57	6	0.61	7	0.59
Francois 1956		60	0.39	66	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	52	0.04	65	0.03
Goldenweiser 1946		46	0.48	52	0.00	53	0.04	57	0.04	57	0.05	56	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		32	0.55	26	0.00	22	0.09	21	0.41	2	0.69	15	0.53
Groot 1988		18	0.61	5	0.05	10	0.09	9	0.57	11	0.50	16	0.53
Hatto 1993		12	0.62	41	0.00	26	0.08	23	0.40	24	0.37	27	0.38
Hatto 1997		16	0.61	64	0.00	27	0.11	22	0.41	17	0.43	24	0.42
Horszowski 1983		25	0.59	22	0.00	16	0.11	17	0.49	9	0.61	11	0.55
Indjic 2001		6	0.65	53	0.00	21	0.12	15	0.51	18	0.43	21	0.47
Katin 1996		5	0.67	25	0.00	9	0.08	4	0.59	10	0.56	10	0.57
Kiepura 1999		42	0.49	35	0.00	43	0.12	33	0.12	18	0.39	33	0.22
Korecka 1992		47	0.47	54	0.00	59	0.04	53	0.04	40	0.06	52	0.05
Kushner 1990		40	0.50	12	0.01	19	0.09	31	0.16	21	0.33	32	0.23
Lilamand 2001		24	0.59	29	0.00	6	0.09	13	0.53	8	0.67	5	0.60
Luisada 1990		17	0.61	21	0.00	5	0.10	11	0.55	12	0.55	12	0.55
Luisada 2008		44	0.48	16	0.01	7	0.08	26	0.32	7	0.49	25	0.40
Lushtak 2004		19	0.60	6	0.04	18	0.17	16	0.50	9	0.49	18	0.49
Malcuzynski 1951		52	0.41	47	0.00	49	0.04	54	0.04	25	0.28	40	0.11
Malcuzynski 1961		20	0.60	4	0.06	4	0.22	12	0.54	7	0.55	14	0.54
Magaloff 1977		13	0.62	9	0.02	14	0.12	5	0.59	3	0.67	3	0.63
Magin 1975		33	0.53	38	0.00	38	0.07	40	0.07	40	0.06	47	0.06
Meguri 1997		15	0.61	8	0.02	25	0.09	28	0.30	6	0.63	23	0.43
Milkina 1970		26	0.58	24	0.00	34	0.06	44	0.06	25	0.17	41	0.10
Mohovich 1999		9	0.63	36	0.00	13	0.11	7	0.58	13	0.59	9	0.58
Nezu 2005		34	0.53	51	0.00	52	0.03	62	0.03	53	0.04	63	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		56	0.40	55	0.00	55	0.04	51	0.04	50	0.05	59	0.04
Olejniczak 1990		1	0.69	3	0.12	3	0.28	3	0.67	1	0.77	1	0.72
Osinska 1989		3	0.67	11	0.01	12	0.10	10	0.56	6	0.60	8	0.58
Perlemuter 1992		43	0.49	48	0.00	46	0.05	47	0.05	19	0.42	37	0.14
Poblocka 1999		39	0.51	56	0.00	50	0.03	61	0.03	38	0.07	49	0.05
Rangell 2001		21	0.60	13	0.01	23	0.08	24	0.39	14	0.62	19	0.49
Richter 1960		10	0.63	15	0.01	11	0.11	6	0.58	10	0.64	4	0.61
Richter 1961		35	0.52	19	0.01	32	0.08	32	0.15	24	0.34	31	0.23
Rosen 1989		30	0.56	23	0.00	36	0.06	43	0.06	19	0.54	35	0.18
Rubinstein 1939		48	0.45	45	0.00	56	0.04	48	0.04	35	0.07	51	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		53	0.41	39	0.00	47	0.05	46	0.05	40	0.06	55	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		38	0.52	59	0.00	40	0.10	35	0.10	46	0.06	43	0.08
Rudanovskaya 2007		23	0.59	10	0.02	35	0.06	41	0.06	45	0.05	53	0.05
Shebanova 2002		37	0.52	63	0.00	41	0.10	34	0.10	32	0.12	39	0.11
Smith 1975		50	0.44	60	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	43	0.07	50	0.05
Sztompka 1959		55	0.40	57	0.00	62	0.04	55	0.04	56	0.05	58	0.04
Tanyel 1992		36	0.52	33	0.00	31	0.07	29	0.20	14	0.60	28	0.35
Tsujii 2005		7	0.64	20	0.01	24	0.10	20	0.42	32	0.11	34	0.21
Uninsky 1959		28	0.57	42	0.00	30	0.10	30	0.18	21	0.35	29	0.25
Vardi 1988		41	0.50	32	0.00	37	0.06	42	0.06	40	0.07	48	0.06
Wasowski 1980		58	0.39	14	0.01	60	0.04	56	0.04	37	0.08	46	0.06
Zimerman 1975		45	0.48	7	0.03	33	0.08	37	0.08	29	0.24	38	0.14
Random 1		65	0.07	46	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	13	0.28	45	0.07
Random 2		63	0.12	49	0.00	58	0.04	50	0.04	2	0.55	36	0.15
Random 3		66	0.00	62	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	25	0.15	54	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).